[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Woman Pleads Guilty in Sex Acts with Boy
posted by Matt on 11:18 AM November 5th, 2005
News Evil White Male Oppressor writes " "When this was first in the paper, it was almost a joke, because of the role reversal," prosecutor Cornelius Kelly said. "It conjures up thoughts of, 'Oh, that's a young man's dream.' But as we stand here today, we still don't know what damage this will have on the young boy's self-esteem, his interpersonal relationships. We don't know what damage the young girl suffered."

The article goes on to say... "Defense attorney Donald Papcsy said Imre had been raped and has a mental problem that made it hard for her to understand that what she did was wrong. "She's not a wicked person," he said."

AT LEAST SHE IS DOING TIME..."

Female Killer Jailed -- on Appeal | Women "excluded" from Senegal circumcision rites  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Can't Believe It! (Score:2)
by Luek on 10:19 PM November 5th, 2005 EST (#1)
I can't believe that the "abuse excuse" card was used to justify her raping an 8 year old little boy!

This misandric society is degenerate to the bone!

Thanks 30 years of rad-fem marxist-socialist doctrine!

I think I have to go puke!

... "Defense attorney Donald Papcsy said Imre had been raped and has a mental problem that made it hard for her to understand that what she did was wrong. "She's not a wicked person," he said."

Re:Can't Believe It! (Score:1)
by Kyo on 08:12 AM November 6th, 2005 EST (#2)
"We don't know what damage the young girl suffered."

What "young girl" is this? There's no young girl in the story at all. A Freudian slip by the prosecutor?
Re:Can't Believe It! (Score:2)
by Luek on 10:46 AM November 6th, 2005 EST (#3)
I think the young girl referred to is the predator's daughter whom I believe is about the same age as the victim. The daughter actually witnessed some of the sexual assaults on the little boy. So the pity party for the perpetrator isn't as full blown as that yet.
Re:Can't Believe It! (Score:1)
by Kyo on 12:11 PM November 6th, 2005 EST (#4)
OK; hadn't thought of that. I was thinking that the prosecutor was so used to girls being the victims that she said "girl" when she meant "boy".
Re:Can't Believe It! (Score:2)
by Luek on 01:13 PM November 6th, 2005 EST (#5)
You are right about the prosecutor being used to "girls only" being victims. This is the misandric mindset in most if not all local, state and Federal prosecutor's offices; men bad, women good...ALWAYS!

That is why this predator got a plea deal for a measly six years which means that she will be out in half that time and will probably be sent to a womens "camp cupcake" like Martha Stewart was. There she can complete or get her college degree, learn French cooking, do elaborate needlepoint, take up oil portrait painting etc.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]