"Animal" Comment Triggers Equality Debate in Sweden

	posted by Matt on 06:43 PM August 24th, 2005
	Anonymous User writes "This article from Women'sEnews is innocently entitled "Animal Comment Triggers Equality Debate in Sweden," but it does not relate the viciousness of the statements made about men by Ireen von Wachenfeldt, a government official who is one of Sweden's best-known feminists. From the article: "The Swedish TV reporter, Evin Rubar, asked von Wachenfeldt about the statement from the SCUM Manifesto: "To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking dildo." "Is that your standpoint?" Rubar asked. "Yes, it's my standpoint," the director said. "That man is an animal?" the reporter said. "Man is an animal," von Wachenfeldt said. "Don't you think so?""

<  RADAR ALERT: Exciting Progress in the House, Now We Need to Zero in on the Senate | Houston's Racist DV Perp Round-Up  >

  

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How von Wachenfeldt can be more attractive: (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 10:53 PM August 24th, 2005 EST (#1)         10. dress in full Islamic garb, covering everything except her eyes         9. feather removing electrolysis         8. wear a ski mask         7. sew up holes in ski mask         6. hire attractive woman to stand in front of her at all times         5. beak job         4. wear a paper bag over the ski mask         3. shave head, tattoo a picture of Cindy Crawford on the back, learn to walk backwards         2. poke out eyes of every man on earth         1. have the president declare every day to be Halloween Madcap Misogynist

Re:How von Wachenfeldt can be more attractive: (Score:1) by Uberganger on 07:29 AM August 25th, 2005 EST (#2) Or why not just smack the manhating piece of filth in the face with a shovel? Gee, I hope nobody accuses me of being a 'radical MRA'.

Re:How von Wachenfeldt can be more attractive: (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 10:34 AM August 25th, 2005 EST (#4) That wouldn't work. The shovel would shrivel up before it got to her face. However, I did here that she went into a haunted house and came out with a job application.   Thundercloud.   "Hoka hey!"

Re:How von Wachenfeldt can be more attractive: (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 10:37 AM August 25th, 2005 EST (#5) There'd have to be two of her to get any uglier...!

Re:How von Wachenfeldt can be more attractive: (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 11:00 AM August 25th, 2005 EST (#7) Wachenfeldt calls MEN animals?!? I guess she hasn't looked in the mirror lately...!   Jinx

Re:How von Wachenfeldt can be more attractive: (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 04:47 PM August 25th, 2005 EST (#9) It may be time for all MRA's and even female supporters of MRAs to read at least one book by Carl Jung. What feminists do, with their scam of The Evil Patriarchy, is called PROJECTION. This happens when a person needs to demonize others for all her/his own failed aspirations. (It's a gender-neutral destroyer of your soul...) What you most despise in yourself (unconsciously) you project onto others, usually those you profess to love. It's what ends most marriages, and kills most relationships. What feminists fear, above all, is having to ASSUME INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY for their anxieties. In fact, feminism is nothing more than an anxiety-reducing addiction, inflicted upon our culture. I could go on.... But it would all be redundant. (Roy)

...so it begins, as it always dose..., (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 10:30 AM August 25th, 2005 EST (#3) This is how all radical hate movements start. American Indians were considered sub-human animals. Thus it was acceptable to murder them in the millions, take their land and deny them constitutional and civil rights. African peoples were considered sub-human animals. Thus it was acceptable to kidnap them from their homeland and use them as slaves and deny them constitutional and civil rights. The Jewish people were considered to be sub-human animals. Thus it was acceptable to place them into concentration camps and murder them by the millions and deny them human rights. Men are considered sub-human animals... I think you can see where this always leads, without further illustration...,   Thundercloud.   "Hoka hey!"

Equal?? How so? (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 10:56 AM August 25th, 2005 EST (#6) I noticed in the article that "violence against women has been prohibited". Well, that's fine and all, but why is there no prohibition on violence against men? If there was REALLY "equality" in Sweden, and else where, BOTH would be prohibited, not just one or the other.   Jinx

Re:Equal?? How so? (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 12:58 PM August 25th, 2005 EST (#8) Jinx- It's simple. Feminists are NOT for equality. They are for supremacy, period.   Thundercloud.   "Hoka hey!

Re:Equal?? How so? (Score:1) by khankrumthebulgar on 12:32 PM August 26th, 2005 EST (#10) Gents this comes as a surprise? To whom at exactly? If you have been living in a cave or stepped forward in time from 1950 maybe. But today it is par for the course Yawn. With all of the other ways that Men are impugned, maligned, hated, villified, marginalized, mistreated, incarcerated, lied about this comes as no shock. That this Skank in Sweden is the head of a Domestic Abuse Shelter also should not come as a shock. Imagine what they say in private about us? Best solution tell em to pound sand. Don't Marry,don't date AW/Western Women. They need us like a Fish needs a bicycle right? Let em find another bicycle. I have given up on our Women. I no longer have any interest in trying to accomadate them in anyway. Their opinion of me is irrelvant. Who cares I no longer do. It makes my life alot saner without trying to meet the insane demands of AW/WW. That is emotional tampon,Protector,Sperm Donor, Cannon Fodder, ATM machine with a penis. Mind Reader,Entertainer, Household Handy Man all are part of the job title of Man today. Sorry no thanks.

[an error occurred while processing this directive]