|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:46 AM July 12th, 2005 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
In the article, she was schlepping the kids to her ex-husband for visitation. What odds will you give that someone tries to blame her ex? It won't be hard to predict:
Not enough child support (the car was rented, but she chose not to rent the next larger car)...
How dare he have the visitation order enforced--what kind of ogre even expects that?
Why didn't he take time off work to accompany the kids on a plane?
Why didn't he charter or arrange a flight for them?
He abuses the kids, so she has to drive them and watch.
Did I miss any?
The woman's mantra: Get in trouble, blame a man.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:31 PM July 12th, 2005 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
That's what I was thinking. They'll probably find some way of blameing Mr Shookmyer. (or however you spell it.)
After this little stunt I wonder how much of a chance there is that the kids will be taken from the mother and given to the father.
Sounds like she shouldn't have had custody in the first place.
But since when has that stopped the family courts from giving custody to the mother even when she is shown un-fit?
No. No bias in OUR court system, is there?
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 04:27 PM July 12th, 2005 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
After this little stunt I wonder how much of a chance there is that the kids will be taken from the mother and given to the father.
Don't bet the rent money on that...
He's more likely to win a lottery mega jackpot.
Sounds like she shouldn't have had custody in the first place.
Isn't that the truth. She demonstarted that she considers it appropriate to lock kids in the trunk because she didn't want to spend what $10-$30 per day for the next larger-sized car. Moreover, the article mentioned an infant who wasn't her ex's. Is this one being supported by the father or welfare?
But since when has that stopped the family courts from giving custody to the mother even when she is shown un-fit?
Never to my knowledge--even when the kids get mutilated or molested by her new stud.
?No. No bias in OUR court system, is there?No more than the media. Notice the tone of all articles is to invoke sympathy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Tirryb on 05:55 PM July 12th, 2005 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
And of course the fact that it was girls (and not boys) who got locked in the trunk has nothing to do with charges being brought...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 06:34 PM July 12th, 2005 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
I was just about to make that point, Tirryb.
Hotspur
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:04 PM July 13th, 2005 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I didn't even think about that.
If the kids had been boys, the mom probably would have gotten a WARNING ticket or something.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 02:55 PM July 15th, 2005 EST (#7)
|
|
|
|
|
She probably wouldn't even have gotten that. (A warning ticket)
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
So, they actually