|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:51 AM June 2nd, 2005 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
Man, this would be funny if they weren't ruining these boys' lives. Anyway, notice the irony here:
First: "It is illegal under state law to have sex with anyone under 16 years old."
Then: "On Jan. 22, two of the hockey players and a 15-year-old male student received oral sex from the girl in a dorm room"
So, is anyone going to prosecute the girl for giving oral sex to a 15-year-old-boy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Luek on 08:15 AM June 2nd, 2005 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
It seems the misandric and femitwit infected state of Messachusetts (the state of the infamous Salem Witch Trials btw) has a problem with oral sex among the 15-16 yo age group. Could kissing be considered underage oral sex and subject to life in prison in Messachusetts?
Of course we all are now educated about if the genders were reversed then there probably would not even be significant media coverage much less prosecution. There is a political agenda being kept by this nutty prosecution as we all know.
I just bet that the DA that is pushing for prosecution is a female with an axe to grind against 50% of the world's population or a little sniveling rat of a feminist keeping agenda testosterone deficient male.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 07:43 PM June 2nd, 2005 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
From the article ---
"Some of the students involved said they were playing a sex game, said the sources, who spoke on the condition of anonymity."
Now we have a very revealing disconnect between the worlds of privileged teen-aged private school preppies, their parents, and our US justice system.
The act being prosecuted has been described as "non-coercive."
But guess what?
No person under legal age can provide "consent" for any act they might choose to perform!
So, under law, neither the fellatrix nor the 15 year-old recipient of her attentions should be legally defined as "consenting."
Moral of the story?
Male sexuality is always, always defined as criminal!
And the boy's faces are plastered all over the papers, while the little anonymous whore gets a pass.
I'm sorry, she's not a whore. Just another future wife.... an ordinary professional-in-training.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 08:32 AM June 4th, 2005 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
The media hyped this case as a "sex scandal" and gave it two days of front page news in the Boston Globb...
"Sex scandals" are all the rage today in MA where the feminist pipeline to the top for all media issues is second to none.
This case was clearly dangerous for the youth of today, and represents the new feminist secular "morality" that criminalizes masculinity based upon female perception of the event alone.
The young guys, having had their pictures and names dragged through the mud and had life in prison charges charges against them got 2 years of max probation each and had to apologize to the little *&^%$
CJ reporting from Mess USA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 06:36 PM June 5th, 2005 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
MA. is leading the way into the future of a sexless society by showing all us Neanderthals west of Boston that adolescent passion is about to be outlawed.
No HS boy with an above 85-IQ is going to miss the import of this court ruling.
Time to re-read "Brave New World."
Passion was a crime only exceeded by thinking ....
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
CJ writes "