[an error occurred while processing this directive]
RADAR Release: RADAR Reports Success in Media Coverage of DV
posted by Matt on 04:18 PM May 18th, 2005
RADAR Project Five years ago, the Washington Post was one of the most ardent supporters for the renewal of the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). News articles, columns, and editorials appeared on a regular and continuing basis, all designed to convince wavering lawmakers to vote “yes” for this $1 billion dollar-a-year pork.

Last year the Washington Post knew that VAWA would be coming up for renewal in 2005, so they ordered up more DV blood-and-guts stories. In December the Washington Post ran a three-part, high-octane series on Maternal Homicide.

Click "Read more..." for more.


But instead of attracting accolades, the series received sharp criticism from columnists representing the full gamut of political persuasions, including Wendy McElroy, Stephen Baskerville, Richard Davis, Michael Getler, Jack Shafer, and Glenn Sacks.

Just as importantly, thousands of persons made phone calls, sent e-mails, and wrote letters to protest three articles that were obviously biased, inflammatory, and contemptuous of men.

It has now been five months since that testament to Yellow Journalism appeared on the front pages of the Washington Post. Normally, the Post would have run at least 10 grisly articles on DV by now, all vilifying men, all ignoring that women are just as likely to abuse their male partners.

But times have changed. During the last five months, the Post has run only one DV article -- and that was written by a non-WP staffer. Of course, RADAR issued an Alert about that article, just to remind the WP editors that we’re still paying attention.

Of course, it’s possible that once VAWA is re-introduced, the Washington Post will go back to its old ways. But we like to think that RADAR has already had a major impact on how the Washington Post and other newspapers are reporting the DV story.

So to every person who has responded to a RADAR Alert and sent an e-mail, made a telephone call, or written a letter, we say, “Working together with conviction and determination, we can really make a difference.”

Thank you for your support of RADAR.

P.S. VAWA is due to be re-introduced any day now, and we will have our work cut out for us! Sign up now to receive RADAR’s e-lerts by visiting our website: http://www.mediaradar.org/.

Fox's McElroy Covers F4J-USA | RADAR to VAWA: “This Time We’re Ready for You!”  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Speaking Of VAWAct (Score:2)
by Luek on 06:35 PM May 18th, 2005 EST (#1)
Here is the reply I got from one of my US Senators,Saxby Chambliss about the upcoming renewal of VAWA.

May 5, 2005

Thank you for contacting me regarding the renewal of the
Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). I appreciate hearing from
you.

            I share your concerns, and agree that is important that we
provide assistance to all victims who have suffered the tragedy of
abuse. Congress and the States must work together to not only
provide assistance to victims of abuse, but to create preventative
measures to stop these terrible acts. Please be assured that I will
keep your thoughts and suggestions in mind as the Violence
Against Women Act comes up for renewal this year.
           
            Thank you again for taking the time to contact me.

Sincerely,

Saxby Chambliss
United States Senate


Re:Speaking Of VAWAct (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 09:37 AM May 20th, 2005 EST (#2)
"I share your concerns, and agree that is important that we provide assistance to all victims who have suffered the tragedy of
abuse. Congress and the States must work together to not only provide assistance to victims of abuse, but to create preventative
measures to stop these terrible acts. Please be assured that I will keep your thoughts and suggestions in mind as the Violence Against Women Act comes up for renewal this year."


It is encouraging to see that Saxby Chambliss thinks all victims of domestic violence deserve assistance, but I wonder if he still thinks (as many politicians have been led to believe by gender feminists) that 95% of victims are women? It is the official proganda in all of the tens of thousands of taxpayer funded women's studies courses on college campuses to this day. Activism is a big part of their education so they will be lobbying for status quo or even more money and services strictly for women. Isn't it strange how our tax dollars go to funding the gender feminist, political hate movement against all males?

I think a lot of elected representatives still think that there's popular support for VAWA as is, and assuming that, will do little to change it. Personally, I think it needs to be very clear what we think of the current form of VAWA. VAWA is currently an act that does as much to empower battering (abusive) females and hurt male victims (and kids) who are victims of domestic violence as much as it does anything.

Stop VAWA - (Violent, Abusive Women's Act) (Disregard order info - click View Larger to see intended message)

Sincerely, Ray

[an error occurred while processing this directive]