[an error occurred while processing this directive]
RADAR Alert: Stanford Law School Promotes Feminist Hate Speech
posted by Matt on 08:06 PM April 24th, 2005
RADAR Project Did you know that “aggression against women” represents a war, and that “the domestic criminal laws are so under-enforced that they can be considered not there.” The speaker further explained, “International law doesn’t capture the reality that half of society is attacking the other half. This is a real war that has gone on for millennia.”

It’s hard to imagine a speech that is more inflammatory or hateful than the one that Catherine MacKinnon gave at Stanford Law School last week. The speech was sponsored by Women of Stanford Law and the Institute for Research on Women and Gender.

Click "Read more..." for more.


Stanford Law School Promotes Feminist Hate Speech

Most people would dismiss MacKinnon’s comments as the sad rantings of a deranged or warped mind. But Carol Li, a second-year law student, praised MacKinnon’s speech as “thought-provoking” and incisive. And Stanford Daily reporter Ronald Chan did not bother to research any statistics that would challenge or dispute MacKinnon’s misguided statements.

The dean of the Stanford Law School, Katherine Sullivan, only had words of praise for MacKinnon’s contributions to women’s liberation: “There are many other prominent feminist theorists in our times, but none of their philosophy is as sweeping and profound as MacKinnon’s.”

In response to MacKinnon’s disturbing diatribe, columnist Cathy Young had this to say:

“Anyone who blamed African-Americans as a group for violent crimes committed by black perpetrators, or Arabs or Muslims as a group for radical Islamic terrorism, would be branded a bigot – and rightly so.”

We whole-heartedly agree.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Contact the Stanford Daily and Katherine Sullivan and tell them the following:

  1. Catherine MacKinnon’s speech is oblivious to the fact that women are just as likely as men to commit domestic violence. [http://www.mediaradar.org/media_fact_sheet.php]
  2. Reporter Ronald Chan published MacKinnon’s over-the-top allegations without making any attempt to assure balanced, objective, or responsible journalism.
  3. Blaming men as a group for domestic violence against women is misguided and hateful, and represents gender bigotry.

Here’s the contact information:

1. Stanford Daily:
Editor in Chief:
Telephone: 650-725-2100, Ext. 501
E-mail: eic-at-daily.stanford.edu.

Letters to the editor: letters-at-daily.stanford.edu

Snail mail:
The Stanford Daily
Storke Publications Building Suite 101
Stanford CA 94305-2240

2. Katherine Sullivan, Dean of the Stanford School of Law
Telephone: 650-725-9875
E-mail: sullivan-at-law.stanford.edu

MacKinnon’s remarks represent hate speech, plain and simple. We can’t let this pass unnoticed.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Date of RADAR Release: April 24, 2005

Come join us for a protest of the New York Times at the White House Correspondent’s Dinner, April 30. For more information, see: http://www.mediaradar.org/protest_wh.php.

Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting (RADAR) is a coalition of men and women working to assure media balance and accuracy in coverage of the domestic violence issue. More information can be found at: http://www.mediaradar.org/.

Women achieving "equality" rights..... | The Usual Propaganda  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
disgusting..... (Score:1)
by Indiana Jones on 10:03 PM April 24th, 2005 EST (#1)
The dean is actually unreachable, you will at most get a secretary.

I tried this right after McKinnon's hate speech but no avail.

So everyone flood her voice messages, e-mails, and contact other law professors at Stanford.

This is exactly why, women don't deserve becoming leaders
A quick digression (Score:1)
by Hunchback on 09:53 AM April 25th, 2005 EST (#2)
Thursday night's episode of ER (Ch. 4 [10 EST]) will feature a victim of domestic violence. It will probably be rife with the usual propaganda. Well, forewarned is forearmed; we should be prepared to flood the network with letters a few hours after it's airing. Such an instant response will impress, and hopefully, influence this very misandrist station.

Just a suggestion.
Re:A quick digression (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 11:00 AM April 26th, 2005 EST (#12)
I never watch ER is that ABC, CBS, or NBC? Our local Ch. 4 in Los Angeles is NBC.

Ray
Re:A quick digression (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 08:48 PM April 26th, 2005 EST (#18)
Yes, that would be NBC.

I don't watch the show either, but I do check the TV Guide in the beginning of the week.
Its about the money... (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 02:26 PM April 25th, 2005 EST (#3)
...VAWA money that is...

This hate speech is an attempt to start the process of getting college students involved for the sake of VAWA funding activism. Right now is a critical time for feminism as the hate act (VAWA) will be coming up soon for new funding.

It is clear that feminists recognize that the hysteria that they have successfully created over violence against women has produced a lucrative industry that dis-empowers all men via court unfair proceedings. This is their intent. Feminists intend to keep women in fear of men by slandering all men based on the actions of the aberrant few.

There is nothing more important than fighting this propaganda, and to expose this socialist money making machine that destroys more families and violates the rights of all men than it does to ACTUALLY save any woman's life. Since its inception and billions of tax $ spent keeping the hate mongers in their gendered ivory towers, VAWA has not changed the amount of people effected by real violence, and violence at the hands of women has actually increased.

I am a victim of false DV accusations. This is why I frequent this site. I know what it feels like to get stripped of all rights on accusation alone... Restore evidentiary hearings! Fight the hate mongers! Now is the time for men’s rights activists to start shouting back. No more silence, speak up against all who support feminist propaganda. The political is now personal for men… enough is enough.

 
It takes a little money to stop evil VAWA money (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 11:29 AM April 26th, 2005 EST (#13)
"I am a victim of false DV accusations. This is why I frequent this site. I know what it feels like to get stripped of all rights on accusation alone... Restore evidentiary hearings! Fight the hate mongers! Now is the time for men’s rights activists to start shouting back. No more silence, speak up against all who support feminist propaganda. The political is now personal for men… enough is enough."

I'm with you brother. Even if they get that man-hating piece of filth (VAWA) passed, they are still going to hear about their sexist manhating loud and long.

It's better if we stop this man hating bigotry in its tracks. Here are a few ways one can help.

Check out these sites,

http://www.cafepress.com/vawa4all

or

http://www.cafepress.com/mensolutions

if you want to get a card or letter to send to an elected representative. Even better make up one of your own letters oppossing reauthorization of VAWA.

The VAWA for All shop says this,

"Everytime you buy something from our shop ALL net procedes we recieve go to support legislative reform and related activities - ALL OF IT!"

"By buying something here you can help change the Violence Against Women Act to be gender neutral and become a part of history."


The Men's Solutions shop says this,

"The Violence Against Women Act needs to be stopped. From today, April 15, 2005, we only have a few months to stop its reauthorization. If the Act is again approved it will probably have more provisions that are horrendously anti family, men, the vast majority of women, and children. We need lots of money to sustain our lobbying efforts and turn the tide away from the "Meism" that VAWA embraces."

"All net proceeds we receive, all of them, go to support related state legislative reforms and a national effort to STOP VAWA, and we need to STOP the Violence Against Women Act this summer, or we will not have another chance until 2010. How much harm to you and your families can VAWA do in the next five years if it goes unchecked?"


Ray
AAAHHH! MY EYE! MY EYE!!! (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 04:14 PM April 25th, 2005 EST (#4)
As some of you may already know, I am blind in one eye.
'Just lettin' you all know I am going in to the hospital for eye surgery, tomorrow, and I probably won't be here for a while.
So take care and keep fighting the fight, while I'm gone, folks.
Be back when I can, Maybe with some sight restored to my eye! :-)

  Thundercloud.
  "Hoka hey!"
Re:AAAHHH! MY EYE! MY EYE!!! (Score:1)
by Gregory on 08:54 PM April 25th, 2005 EST (#7)
Good luck with your eye surgery, Thundercloud. I hope you'll be feeling OK soon. Join us when you feel up to it.

Gregory


Re:AAAHHH! MY EYE! MY EYE!!! (Score:2)
by HombreVIII on 09:30 PM April 25th, 2005 EST (#8)
Best wishes to you on that TC. Do come back and let us know how it turned out as soon as possible.
Re:AAAHHH! MY EYE! MY EYE!!! (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 10:04 AM April 26th, 2005 EST (#10)
All the best, TC.
Hotspur
Re:AAAHHH! MY EYE! MY EYE!!! (Score:2)
by Steve (simparl@aol.com) on 10:46 AM April 26th, 2005 EST (#11)
http://www.maledepression.com
Get well soon, Thundercloud.

--I rejoice at the destruction of gender feminism, and I laugh at its shattered ruins.
Re:AAAHHH! MY EYE! MY EYE!!! (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 11:32 AM April 26th, 2005 EST (#14)
You are a true and honorable warrior in the cause of equal rights for men. We will sorely miss you and pray for your speedy recovery and swift return, old friend.

Sincerely, Ray
Get well soon. (Score:1)
by LibertyUNH on 12:35 PM April 26th, 2005 EST (#15)
Best luck on the surgery, TC!
Re:AAAHHH! MY EYE! MY EYE!!! (Score:1)
by B_Riddick on 03:43 PM April 26th, 2005 EST (#17)
Wow, I didn't know that such restoration was possible. I'm guessing it depends on what caused the blindness in the first place, right? I am blind in one eye as well, have been for most of my life. It was pretty severely damaged by a blunt instrument though. Still, it's great to hear that you've got a shot at getting yours fixed, I hope it works out for you. I'm probably SOL until cybernetic eyes become a reality,heh. I want one that shoots lasers, I've always said. ;)
Family photo and ten humble suggestions (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 05:40 PM April 25th, 2005 EST (#5)
A quaint photo of MacKinnon and Andrea Dworkin in their glory days is here.

To help them appear more attractive, I have ten humble suggestions:

  1. dress in full Islamic garb, covering everything except your eyes
  2. feather removing electrolysis
  3. wear ski masks
  4. sew up holes in ski masks
  5. hire attractive women to stand in front of you at all times
  6. beak jobs
  7. wear paper bags over the ski masks
  8. shave heads, tattoo pictures of Cindy Crawford on the back, learn to walk backwards
  9. poke out eyes of every man on earth
  10. have the president declare every day to be Halloween
Madcap Misogynist
Re:Family photo and ten humble suggestions (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 07:48 PM April 25th, 2005 EST (#6)
It's interesting that you can locate hundreds of feminist academic papers on the "male construction of female beauty," but not a single one on the male construction of "UGLY!"

Nor will you find a feminist treatise on women's self-loathing of body-image as an indicator of feminist tendencies.

"Big" girls have "bigger ideas..." apparently.


HA! (Score:2)
by Clancy (long_ponytail@yahoo.com) on 12:42 PM April 26th, 2005 EST (#16)
yer killin' me. Looks like they didn't fit the Cosmo profile so instead of blaming women for creating their own stereotypes, it's just not proper. While men live, they must be blamed - for whatever comes to mind at the moment.
The bright side (for me...) (Score:1)
by cosmo on 05:40 AM April 26th, 2005 EST (#9)
Well, this certainly makes my recent Stanford Law School rejection letter easier to take!
[an error occurred while processing this directive]