|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:29 PM March 2nd, 2005 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not suprised this happened. And the way women are socialised to hate men and to believe that there is nothing wrong with women being violent against males, her choice of target is especialy no suprise.
It's getting worse, folks. And I may be wrong but it is likely to get even worse still.
Already this week I read about yet another woman castrating her boyfriend (In Anchorage Alaska) and yet another woman running her husband down with a car. Now I read about this. Is it all just a coincidence or is female hatred towards men and their acting out on that hatred growing? I think we all know the ansewer to that.
The most disturbing trend seems to be the number of women attacking young boys. They seem to be doing so sexualy, more often too.
Get ready. If my Cherokee instincts tell me any thing, it is that we are going to see this getting much worse before we see it getting any better.
This society had better wake up, and realize that there will never be peace between male and female untill BOTH side's issues are taken into consideration.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by ArtflDgr on 11:03 AM March 3rd, 2005 EST (#8)
|
|
|
|
|
"The most disturbing trend seems to be the number of women attacking young boys. They seem to be doing so sexually, more often too."
i think you may be off on this one tiny part Mr. Thundercloud. : ) [please don’t make the Manitou in my computer mad for saying so]
i think we as a culture are finally seeing the damage that older women young boy relationships have on the boys. its actually a little sign in improvement as previously the boy wouldn’t tell, and accidental pregnancy on his part is not possible, nor can you say there are micro tears and stuff.. so i don’t thing that more are doing it, i think more are finding the practice totally unacceptable, and the courts also are finding it such and sending the women off to jail. ok not in the same way or amounts.. but its better than what went before...
With that said.. i do think that those super moms are getting way too stressed out all around trying to be everything to herself and those around her.. In this case she wanted to defend her son.. a dad would probably let them fight it out for a while (my dad did, and i did, it happens and better the kid learns when he is small and the damage slight). whats also different though is that when it was time to break it up a good dad would do just that, separate them, stand in between (not the smartest thing), and stop them.. i have seen it hundreds of times.. then aftet they calm down and they will listen, he gets them to call it quits and shake hands.. if its a real grudge other than a sport thing, they will have issues later.. if it was just a sports thing with adrenalin running high and desire with it, then they will probably be friends for the next game, or at least civil...
in general guys do not hold grudges any where near as long..
for some reason us guys in general tend not to keep a fine box of past slights and dings, and we certainly don’t keep them polished and shining and new like the ladies do (if you think i am wrong ask any man that been through a neg divorce).
you see this everywhere.. and i think what’s happening is that feminism has helped women find all new things to put in their box and carry with them. Eventually it blows up.
while her son will forget many of the things that happen as nothing, the mom is remembering every slight that he is getting and adding them up and tallying, to her, they are not part of the game and are offenses. Eventually, if unlucky, some incident occurs where not only is she involved, but she lets go. So while running in to stop the fight, and the boys being uncooperative (girls girls stop this fighting may work with ladies, but they guys wont even hear you. Shoot paying attention to her would mean getting cold cocked), it got rough and not thinking she started taking out those polished stones and give comeuppance.
I of course have more comments, but heck, it gets tiring after a while…
Artfldgr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:23 AM March 3rd, 2005 EST (#9)
|
|
|
|
|
"Now I read about this. Is it all just a coincidence or is female hatred towards men and their acting out on that hatred growing?"
In her scholarly research paper, DISABUSING THE DEFINITION OF DOMESTIC ABUSE: HOW WOMEN BATTER MEN AND THE ROLE OF THE FEMINIST STATE, Linda Kelly writes,
"...the failure to stigmatize or even acknowledge the female abuse of men allows and encourages its continuation (91), Pp.812."
and
"Domestic violence represents the prized gemstone of feminist theory's fundamental message that our legal, social, cultural norms are fashioned in a manner which permit men to engage in a constant and pervasive effort to oppress women by any and every available means. A successful challenge to the Patriarchal definition of domestic violence may thus undermine feminism itself. (my emphasis) To remain true to feminist theory, no aspect of male-female relations can be considered without first accepting the male as all powerful and the female as powerless. (119) The gender hierarchy is omnipresent. (120) Pp. 818
Domestic Violence Law is a Feminist Scam
In Dept. of Justice (DOJ) reports for intimate partner violence there is a category for other relatives and acquaintances. It appears that the woman in this news article would qualify under DOJ reporting guidelines as an intimate, but it appears journalists only report "intimate violence" per se, when it is a crime against females. I have my doubts about the DOJ even following their own guidelines, given the gender feminist training of law enforcement and judges. This story appears to once again show that journalism, routinely, bigotedly, exludes male victims of violence from being chategorized as actual victims of intimate violence/domestic violence.
Males Are the Hate Target of Domestic Violence Law
Women Will Be Safe When They Stop Abusing Their Children
Sincerely, Ray
Please do not scroll up the page of the linked item(s). All the info I'm trying to convey is as the page initially comes up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by The_Beedle on 03:03 PM March 2nd, 2005 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
The prosecutor went for more, also accusing her of assault and battery with a weapon (her shoe and foot), which is good. They weren't playing down the incident with weak charges. There were witnesses who said that she didn't actually do any kicking, so it's within the realm of reasonable to assume the court got it right.
SuperMom got convicted of assault and got "one year of probation, including 50 hours of community service, an anger management program, the video assignment, and an order to stay away from the victim", so there's at least a restraining order in place.
The only thing missing from the story is the term 'child abuse'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:23 PM March 2nd, 2005 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
the punishment does not fit.
This article left out the fact that the WITNESSES standing in the audience saw the kicking. Not the unpire on the playing field who came after the incident started. This was stated when the charges were set (and ommitted this time in the paper) - once again a slant towards lessening the crime because a woman did it.
I agree the sentence may be (somewhat) appropriate, but can you honestly say a man attacking a young girl at a sporting event would have got the same punishment? NO!
Jail sentencing is out of hand in the US for any "gender" crime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:31 PM March 2nd, 2005 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
FINE.
Women seem to think it is so funny to go around kicking men in the balls. Let's start going around kicking them in their twats and see how they like it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 10:28 AM March 3rd, 2005 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
According to gender feminist theory, women only use violence in self-defense, and because they are battered women who must live in a world of Patriarchal power and control. Male privilege oppresses them.
As we all know, and see from this story, it just isn't so. Women use violence as a weapon to control and batter males, to exert their dominance over them, and to abuse them.
The only thing more evil than the female batterers getting off with a slap on the wrist for felonious assault and battery is the evil government(s) that allow them to do so. Some of the precise details are missing from this story, but the penalty for felony assault and battery in California is 7 years so IMHO, no way was this sentence fair or just. It just reflects the male-hating bigotry that is so characteristic of gender feminist dominated hate states like Massachusetts. The complete absence of any jail time at all for this sexual assault sends a clear message to all the females in Massachusetts that they can sexually assault males and the gender feminist dominated hate state will just wink at it and wisk it away.
The main thing this story can concretely teach us is the disparity in sentencing for the same crime when committed by a woman as compared to when committed by a man. A man would have been sentenced to jail time had he kicked a young girl in her sexual area at a sporting event, and it would have been all over the TV news.
Given the epidemic of child abuse, that is killing and destroying our children, and is committed by violent, power wielding women, this woman should have been made an example of with a lengthy prison sentence.
What Can Women Do To Stop Their Violence Against Children
Law Has No Integrity When Female Batterers Lack Accountability
Sincerely, Ray
Please do not scroll up the page of the linked item(s). All the info I'm trying to convey is as the page initially comes up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by ArtflDgr on 10:36 AM March 3rd, 2005 EST (#7)
|
|
|
|
|
notice...
"The assault became a symbol of what many see as an overly intense youth sports culture driven by out-of-control parents."
and that the story was about a mother..
they always do this when a woman does something wrong. they are forced to focus on her, then as soon as they get that done they change the wording to apply to both genders. when its a male they dwell on the first part, and then condemn all men.. the pattern is like a three foot deep walking rut its been trod on so much..
personally i dont see men get as nuts as the women do. jeese.. you have all kinds of examples that come to mind.. this woman here, the woman that hired a hitman to get a girl so her daughter can be cheerleader. whats her face (i dont want to know her name - i wont want her to be remembered for any reason) that hit the skater with a pipe..
its my opinion that women are so use to breaking the rules that they dont know which to follow and which not to follow... or rather they dont know which ones they will be called to the table on.. shoot, if you can get away with cutting off a mans penis and make woman of the year... why whould shoving a boy and hitting him with your shoe be wrong? (maybe the boy would have to be asleep like the other men)...
I will bet you this though.. she thinks she was still right attacking a child...
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
CJ writes "A mother