This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Currently, a mother who does not allow her children court-ordered access time with their father can be fined or imprisoned. In practice, this never happens because the child would be the big loser.
"It's rarely used because this would be taking a sledgehammer to crack a nut," says a government spokesman."
Whoa there . . . it is a damned big nut . . . perhaps a wrecking ball is needed ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And . . . Oh, dear me No ! it would be truly wrong to suggest the kids may spend time with Dad whilst mom is in prison . . .
. . . and then again, we surely cannot have it learned by our children that mom's have to obey any Law ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 10:58 PM December 23rd, 2004 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
Giving a father custody of his kids because the mother denied visitation rights makes perfect sense.
I'd suggest hitting these blockheads with a sledgehammer. But you couldn't do that. They have their heads up their asses!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:02 PM December 23rd, 2004 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
that reflect more accurately a society where living together and divorce are increasingly common, and more men are shouldering a share of child care.
That last clause pisses me off. As if fathers haven't always worked their butts off one way or another. As if being a wage slave because you didn't have any other choice in a marriage but to be a wage slave doesn't earn you rights to a relationship with your child.
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]