Massachusetts Reforming Misandric Judiciary?

	posted by Adam on 02:39 PM December 7th, 2004
	Luek writes ""As a result, when a father walks into Family Court, he is the only one in the courtroom without immunity to commit perjury and fraud," The quote from the article above indicates that the state of Massachusetts may be waking up from its comatose sleep induced by the feminazi sirens song of perpetual female victimhood. Well, let's hope so because when it comes to the legal status and standing of 50% of the states population (MEN!) there is no place to go but up."

<  UK: Women MPs bullied in Commons! | Over-50 Divorce Rate Soars  >

  

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

"child support" racket (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 09:58 PM December 7th, 2004 EST (#1) The "child support" racket is a gross fraud. It's mainly about judicial screwing of men to benefit lawyers and rich white women (they're the ones who marry rich white guys). As for all the poor black kids whose daddy's a poor black man: too bad, no "child support" for you!

Re:"child support" racket (Score:1) by Ragtime on 01:54 PM December 9th, 2004 EST (#3) (User #288 Info) "The "child support" racket is a gross fraud. It's mainly about judicial screwing of men to benefit lawyers and rich white women (they're the ones who marry rich white guys). As for all the poor black kids whose daddy's a poor black man: too bad, no "child support" for you!" You can choose to see racism here if you want -- and lord knows feminism is very guilty of it, particularly against white men -- but I think you're missing the point. Whether black or white, it's most often the case of Dad not being *around* to support his family because mommy, with the help of the State, drove him out. And he's far more likely to be "dead-broke" than a "dead-beat." We need to keep fathers *in* families, not drive them out and then rape them for what little they have left. Heard *far* to many stories of mommy being supported in "the style she is accustomed to" while 'dead-beat-dad' is sleeping outside in the back of his old pickup, or crashing on a cot in someone's furnace room. Where's *his* right to continue to live in even humane conditions, much less those to which he's accustomed? Ragtime The Uppity Wallet The opinions expressed above are my own, but you're welcome to adopt them.

pfft (Score:1) by scudsucker on 04:32 PM December 8th, 2004 EST (#2) (User #700 Info) Mr. McLarnon, a forensic investigator with 23 years experience, has been investigating the Massachusetts judiciary for nine years. His investigation revealed evidence that discloses that Chief Justice Marshall and her judiciary have unconstitutionally "legislated from the bench" "Legislating from the bench" is rightwingnutese for "any ruling by a judge that we don't like" and holds as much currency as a two dollar Confederate bill with Saddam Hussien's face on it. This is the part that would actually hold water, if true: McLarnon asserts he has physical evidence that several Massachusetts courts illegally edit court-hearing tapes, doctor dockets, alter court files and hide court files. "...show young men an ideal of manhood that respects women and rejects violence" George W. Bush - Republican 2005

[an error occurred while processing this directive]