This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because bigotted feminazis want men to have the worst health and keep men dying at an early age.
Feminazis control the government and will pervert the truth to their likeness in order to continue their oppression of males (and enlightened women like me).
Who ever has the truth, can skew it anyway they like. Not to mention misappropriate resources such as healthcare. The public can't stand up and defend itself if it's sickly and always ailing. *Ms.Thea the Pre-Law Major, Pro-Gender Egalitarian, and Pro-Reproductive Rights Activist*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 10:34 PM November 16th, 2004 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
"Feminazis control the government and will pervert the truth to their likeness in order to continue their oppression of males (and enlightened women like me).
Who ever has the truth, can skew it anyway they like."
Thea:
I'm retiring soon so I hope to start visiting my elected representatives personally, get to know them. Although militant feminists are not a majority in the government, they still exercise an inordinate amount of power and control, because other politicians are afraid to oppose them. I also hope to get the time to start picketing more elected representatives offices. If they start getting the heat from men's rights advocates like they've been getting it from radical feminists their attitudes may change. I really hope I can find some other old retired duffers who will join me in this. Everyone I know now is working except one other retired guy whose always trying to get me to join him.
"Who ever has the truth, can skew it anyway they like."
Truer words were never spoken. Taxpayer funded, women's studies classes on college campuses have been skewing a version of truth for decades. I hope to write a flyer about the discrimination that young men face on college campuses, and in other areas of their lives. Unfortunately in California any refutation of women's studies could be alleged to be a form of intimidation of women (a protected class) and therefore a hate crime. The key, I believe, is to take the villification of males that is in the women's studies curriculum/textbooks and refute that without ever mentioning the female sex.
Sincerely, Ray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because bigotted feminazis want men to have the worst health and keep men dying at an early age.
Absolutely right! I like to call it malign neglect, kind of electioneering by working to keep government from doing anything to stop men from dying by various preventable means. To feminists, men don't matter -- not even when we die from preventable means.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"To feminists, men don't matter -- not even when we die from preventable means."--canaryguy
And it seems that men don't matter to feminists even when male death and disability place burdens on women and children.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"To feminists, men don't matter -- not even when we die from preventable means."--canaryguy
And it seems that men don't matter to feminists even when male death and disability place burdens on women and children.
Indeed! Feminists just concentrate on the suffering of women. The fact that their men were slaughtered doesn't merit a mention! Disability seems to be a feminist two-fer, the woman has to earn money AND care for her disabled man.
Of course it is never mentioned that feminists worked against toughening workplace safety laws -- to the detriment of men.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course it is never mentioned that feminists worked against toughening workplace safety laws -- to the detriment of men.
Do you have any more information about this canaryguy?
Feminism will continue as long as there is money to be made from hating men.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course it is never mentioned that feminists worked against toughening workplace safety laws -- to the detriment of men.
Do you have any more information about this canaryguy?
Basically feminists worked to define workplace safety in the late 1990's to protect women from abusive boyfriends and husbands. Big Business worked to avoid workplace safety laws with real teeth. Throw those two movements together and Big Business can still willfully violate OSHA regulations without effective penalty -- not even when this leads to serious injury and death.
The feminist fraud on workplace safety is that domestic violence has nothing to do with workplace safety. Workplace safety is about safety in the WORK PLACE, not about deterring stalking behavior. Deterring stalking behavior is a general police matter!
A Google search can reveal enough information to connect the dots. NOW's web site displays their past and present selfishly evil agendas. And if you want to see how an evil company can willfully violate workplace safety laws in such a way that people die (and get away with it), catch Frontline's "A Dangerous Business".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This just wreaks of an opportunity for a 14th Amendment challenge (Equal treatment under the law). I wish I had the resources to pursue it.
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]