|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 08:44 PM October 14th, 2004 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
Why we are fighting terrorism?
Maybe they're really here to save us and we just haven't figured it out yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know, I don;t like the way I'm being treated by the women and the male feminists in this country, but, likewise, I do not like the way the Islamofascits treat women either.
Bin Laden, al Raman, Zawahiri, and Zarqawi are NOT here to save my life, or my son's life, either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:37 PM October 15th, 2004 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
Happy about the way Islam treats its men are you ?
Some of the strictest most reactionary laws and codes known and yet the only ones talked about are those that affect women.
The feminists dont have to do much to get us jumping through their hoops.When it comes to morality we are always eager to prove how correct we are.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actually, and I have done quite a bit of research on this and I live outside the shadow of American propaganda, your likelyhood of being "collateral damage" in an Al Queda attack is a function of how close you are standing to an American Zionist. Wake up folks...members of the Bin Laden family have shit in George Bush's toilet more often than any American has. Al Queda refers to George as "the jackass the Jews are riding" that should tell you something about their targeting priorities. And it's really just a reflection of the targetting priorities the Israelis use on them.
Anyway, I am inclined to agree that the feminazi infiltration is a much more serious threat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huh?
Perhaps you're misreading my post. I am NOT happy about how the Islamofascists treat men. I am likewise NOT happy about how they treat women.
Radical Islam is NOT the answer to the problem of radical feminism.
Is that clear?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 06:36 PM October 15th, 2004 EST (#7)
|
|
|
|
|
Whats clear is how constantly, mention is made of the problem faced by "women" under islamic law, and how equally constant it is that the lives of men under these same laws and regimes are ignored.
Whats also clear is that your post was yet another example of that. I can only read what you actually write.Which is why i responded to what you actually wrote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My point was simpy this....American foreign policy is a...(Hmmm??)... MARVEL!!! to those of us who live outside of America and the power of your propaganda machine is impressive indeed...but in terms of any real negative impact on the lives of you or your son all the Kaliph's horses and all the Kaliph's men that Al Queda can possibly muster are a negligable threat compared to feminist indoctrination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All the Caliph's horses and all the Caliph's men killed 3,000 people in one, swift stroke, and al Quaeda would be happy to kill millions more if they had the means.
As oppressive as feminist-dominated government is, no one has shown up at my doorstep or anywhere else to kill me or my son. At least the problem of feminism can be solved politically, as we're beginning to see. The problem of Islamofascism can only be solved with the shedding of blood.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not wanting to saguay in this discussion but I would like to point out a couple of things since many reader of this forum are going to be casting ballots in an election that will affect all citizens of the world soon.
First, if a wasp has stung you, it makes no sense whatsoever to cut down the tree that is located two or three trees over from the tree that actually contains the wasp nest. Now I know that the average American doesn't have a clue about the world outside their own borders, but let me assure you that there is enough God forsaken Hellish hot sand Between Saudi Arabia and Iraq to dehydrate any camel that tries to cross it.
All 15 members of the terrorist Al Queda cell who were identified as participants in 9/11 were Saudis...not Iraqis.
The most probable whereabouts of Osama bin Ladin at this moment is in the basement of his parent's palacial home on the outskirts of the capital of Saudi Arabia. Why do I say this? Because that is the one place on this entire planet that George Bush would never insist on being searched for him. If in fact he were to be located there...perhaps I would be entitled to a 26 million dollar finders fee.
But unfortunately that fee will never be paid to anyone. If I were a "Soldier of Fortune"type bounty hunter and showed up at the foyer of the CIA with Osama bin Ladin's head and right hand (for fingerprint verification) in an ice filled picnic cooler looking for that reward, the CIA would kill me and everybody connected with me to keep that a secret. Why? Because George Bush and his paranoia machine running mates and particularly war-monger Donald Rumsfeld could never find in all of the earth a villain and a boogey man of that quality.
If you are bound and determined to hit back for 9/11...please take more carefull aim.
As for my previous position that feminazis are a more present and immediate threat...they have co-opted our schools, universities, libraries, media,courts,legislative assemblies...and our homes....Al Queda is a long long way from achieving THAT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I'm sure you'll be voting for Kerry this November, based on the tone of your post (:-). But w.r.t. Iraq, I'd point out a couple of things.
1) Missles and planes move far faster than camels.
2) The link between Hussien and al Quaeda is unmistakable (even accepting the questionable idea that Iraq did not participate in planning the 9/11 attacks).
3) The UN listed a fairly substantial quantity of WMDs in 1998, the whereabouts of which are currently unknown! Although Hussein has said he destroyed them, there is no corroborating evidence or accounts.
4) The Duelfer Report CLEARLY concluded that Hussein maintained the intent and the capability to reconstitute his WMD programs as soon as the sanctions were dealt with.
5) The sanctions were collapsing due to the duplicity of the French, Germans, and Russians.
6) Hussein demonstrated his intent to use WMDs, launching them against the Kurds and the Iranians.
7) Hussein had his own record of brutality against his own people.
8) Of all of the 'next' targets we could have chosen, Iraq was the least unacceptable to the 'international' community, especially given the long list of UN resolutions (17) over a period of eleven years, and Hussein's intransigence on them.
But you and I are not really arguing about whether Iraq is more of a threat than feminism. We're arguing about whether or not Islamic terrorism is more of an immediate threat than feminism. These extremists have stated their intent, over and over, to attack the US on our soil. I agree, the feminists are attacking, too, but they are attacking with courts and lawyers, not guns and explosives.
I can find a way to co-exist with this feminized system whilst I try to change it (that's the reason I'm here), and I can find a way to "unteach" most of the misandry the schools have delivered to my son. But even if I choose to carry a gun, it is difficult for me to defend myself against a terrorist attack.
It occurs to me that most of the terrorists that would be inclined to attack here in the US are currently attacking in Iraq. That's not an especially good thing for Iraqis, but it IS a good thing for me and my son.
And finally, back to the original point: the Koran specifies some pretty harsh treatment of women uniquely, that I don't support. The over-feminization of the US is a large problem for me, but I could never support Islam as the answer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am glad some part of the formal political spectrum appears ready to state the obvious. I think the only political party I have seen whose members have unashemedly stood up and called the feminist tyrrany what it is are Libertarians. Now of course they don't speak for the party as Libertarians are known to have a wide range of opinions on many matters, but at least they are stating in the same breath, "I am a Libertarian and also am pointing out the reality of what is happening here."
Well, again, I want to reiterate, men, just DO NOT get married. You can avoid not the occasions of sin as it were but the occasions of vulnerability to opportunistic feminist attacks by avoiding marriage entirely. It will not keep you perfectly safe but remove 95% of the opportunity from your would-be attackers. Same thing re gfs - pick and choose real carefully. A gf can get you in as much trouble as a wife with false accusations and other nonsense just as well. In short, don't cohabit with a woman and for chrissakes don't marry one. Not until sanity returns to the west anyway. Who knows when that'll be....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In my own experience it is not as absolutely bleak as that. I am separated from my spouse, but we did and still do share the same view of feminists. My beloved daughter did not understand or appreciate me until she experienced pursuing a career as a med lab tech and got married and is now at home breast feeding my grandson. "Papa, that thing you used to say that penises are uniquely male but assholes are another matter...Oh, boy!!! did that ever hit the nail on the head."
Actually I envision fair minded females winning back the just balance in this conflict and not aggrieved men.
They are out there...women who have not bought in to the feminazi doctrine...I may burn in Hell for saying this but you just might have to steal one from a fool who does not appreciate what he has....but they are indeed there. Just don't be fooled or be foolish. It is one of the most sad perversions of this mind poison that a woman who is indoctrinated into the feminazi mindset may for a time be overwhelmed by her natural attraction to you...and then later...when she discovers that sexual and emotional blackmail cannot transform you into what she imagines she desires, she will then feel obliged to punish you for fucking her.
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
