This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This isn't really a comment on the article -- though it does have some bearing on the attitudes behind the court's decision. I just thought that some people here might appreciate this cartoon. --
Evil Pundit of Doom!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry but I think sex offender registry is a good idea. As a certain pedophile female teacher shows us, sex offenders are often repeat offenders even after they serve jail time.
It's important to know who your children may be coming into contact with.
Is this really the issue? I don't think so. What we need is to focus on getting female AND male sex offenders listed (are they not already? - I dont know).
AND we need to focus on stopping the false allegations against men who are wrongly labelled sex offenders.
I have no sympathy for rapists or child molesters nor do I have any sympathy for their loss of rights and privacy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sadly, too many fathers are being falsely accused of child abuse, simply to prevent them access to their own children after divorce. Allow this to happen and soon we shall see all those fathers listed, albeit probably innocent men.
As you must be aware, 96% of Rape allegations are not proved, and this when they know they will be properly cross-examined. So, knowing they will not have to prove anything in a Family Court, what level of False Allegations do you imagine might be the routine ? ? ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 09:57 PM August 4th, 2004 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
Where is the line drawn with regards to putting someone's information up when they commit a crime? Eventually everyone's name will be up there, and that is a whole lot of people since apparently 3% of the people in the United States are in jail.
There are worse things then putting a penis into a vagina or anus by force it seems. Put their names up there too, so we can all have a greater chance to find someone to be vigalanties to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I understand wanting to stop pedophiles, but consider who gets Level 3 and who doesn't (consider the teacher Mary J Lotourno)
Here is a feminist saying we should expand Megan's Law and Sex Abusers Registries to ALL of those: EVEN THE ACCUSED AND AQQUITTED
http://www.cnn.com/2002/LAW/08/columns/fl.hilden.m egans.law/index.html
Understand, the feminists use a multi-prong attack. One asks for sex offender registries to be public, while another asks for even the AQQUITTED to be ON the registry.
Give it some thought
Steven Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The best proof that feminists are insane is that they want a mere accusation be enough to punish "evil men" and that they want to shift the burden of proof from the accuser to the accused (see this stupid petition).
Their plans will create a "Salem Witch Trial" type of atmosphere. And, remember, it was young girls throwing out accusations against the poor and powerless that caused the whole thing. (People in the "good part" of Salem had little to fear.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They know that men will rarely REPORT it, and even if they do and initiate the divorce they'll likely lose the kids ...
and now they want a change in the presumption of innocence. Did you READ those comments. And they say MRAs are "woman haters" because we "dare" to point out the LAW or that women abuse too.
Typical bullsh*t.
Steven Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 07:11 PM August 5th, 2004 EST (#9)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I already knew that most online petitions are completely useless. I just wanted to show some of the craziness out there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Was from me by the way.
L. Steven Beene II. = LSBeene
Just saying so we have full disclosure.
I hope it wakes her up.
Steven Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 02:05 AM August 5th, 2004 EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
It's one of my favorite quotes, and it's from Reverend Martin Niemoeller:
First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me.
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]