|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:13 PM May 3rd, 2004 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
Shouldn't this be called alimony? And since when is 55K a year not a decent salary!
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It aint the left Dittohd.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 08:51 PM May 3rd, 2004 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
If the woman was making more money and the had primary custody, she would still get child support -- no problem, no case. This isn't socialism. It's capitalistic exploitation of males as wage slaves. And the women are the family factory owners. Time for the male prols to go on strike!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SOCIALISM? no, S L A V E R Y, plain slavery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Un-freaking believable!
This decision, if it stands, will send all the non-custodial parents flocking to their lawyers just to fly a request for more graft.
And the custodial dad in this case gets penalized for his success!
Of course 90% of the higher earning parents will surely be male, because a high-earning husband is almost always subsiding a low-earning, non-working, or part-time employed wife.
One more convincing argument for the growing Marriage Strike by right-minded men!
"It's a terrible thing ... living in fear."
- Roy: hunted replicant, Blade Runner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
" 90% of the higher earning parents will surely be male, because a high-earning husband is almost always subsiding a low-earning, non-working, or part-time employed wife."
This is a very strong message the Goverment is sending to all males: If one accepts to subsidiazed a female living standar will be forced to do it for live, so donīt do it, do not provide for women just let them work to earn their food.
Again tis is another example of policies having the oppositte desired effect, traditional men wanted to punish non traditional men, (those who does not accept that their role is to support a woman), and they are the ones most punished.
Never marry a non working female, never marry down, beauty is efimerate, or better still never marry at all, thats is, never accept to subsidiazed a female live style, or inplicitly you are accepting to do it for ever.
If one accpets to be a "Provider" so be it, the goverment will make sure he keep on "providing",
do you want to be a Slave? (sorry , how was that?. oh yes,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No, as Prof. Leykis says, it should be called vaginamony.
Fifty five grand a year is a nice chunk. What a greedy useless bitch.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just shows that all men have the responsibility to women and children. We must "Income Redistribute" to make sure the women has more money that the man after any divorce. This ruling will soon be whittled down to all men must pay child support to the women no mater custody status or income.
I'm glad that an outright tax against men for being a man can't get through legislation, yet. I mean think of the children. (Or is the armed forces the very tax I speak of, our lives?)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More of the same. You can be 1000% sure that if the genders were reversed, this would not have happened.
She is being rewarded for being a woman and having less of whatever it takes to make as much money as her ex-husband. That's all.
Avoid marriage. Just don't do it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Avoid marriage. Just don't do it."
feminists and traditionalist are to sides of the same coin, child support, alimony, marital property laws, etc,etc,etc, are just punishment for people that divorce.
The real objective is to avoid divorces by punishing the ones they think are more prone to do it, men, but they are achieving just the opposite, women are so incentivated to do it that marriage wows, (till death do us a part), is a joke, and men are avoiding marriage like the scum it is (in aglosaxon countires).
In a couples of decades housewives will be found in the museums , just the opposite traditional men want.
So right on target, avoid marriage, avoid getting related with female parasites, (females that are searching for a male to support them), avoid poor women, (or they will use the law to get out of poverty at your expense, temptations is so strong), avoid female losers, (those that makes less money than you), men must become much more materialistic than women when getting related with the opposite sex, a matter of survival.
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
