[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Kobe's Prosecutors Seek to Erase History
posted by Hombre on 11:20 AM March 11th, 2004
News Roy writes "The prosecutors in the Kobe Bryant rape case have appealed to the Colorado Supreme Court to deny the defendant's inquiry into the sexual history of his accuser. Under Colorado's rape-shield laws, the pattern of sexual promiscuity and predation by the female accuser are to be deemed "irrelevant." Interesting that this intrepretation of the law basically means that the "lady" seeking to end Mr. Bryant's career has no personal responsibility for her own past actions and choices, and that the CO. law is biased against any man who seeks vindication by showing a pattern of intentional predatory behavior by a female. Go figure. Article here."

National Committee on Status of Women broke? | Hollywood 'Stereotypes Violence to Women' - Actor  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Absurd and Unjust (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 12:42 PM March 11th, 2004 EST (#1)
This line of reasoning is absurd and completely unjust. A defendant's past is frequently brought into question...and the "accuser" in this case could easily wind up as a defendant. If this case exposes the "accuser" as a fraud, I would love to see her name and crime posted on the headlines of every major newspaper in this country. It won't happen, but it would be a step in the right direction. It might hold back some would-be false accusers from their illegal, irresponsible actions, knowing that they may actually be ACCOUNTABLE for their actions. Shocking!
Re:Absurd and Unjust (Score:1)
by MAUS on 08:12 PM March 11th, 2004 EST (#2)
(User #1582 Info)
I am aquainted with someone who has done time for an unjust accusation of rape. It's a long story and really even MORE horrendous than anything posted on this site. It even involves the accusor's therapist coming forward voluntarily...without the accused or his lawyer even asking...to state that a miscarriage of justice was taking place that the accusor was a Munchaussen compulsive liar and that she had played out this little drama on others...he had his medical license revoked and got run out of town for his efforts and his testimony was ruled inadmissable. The irony was...nobody ever sang any louder in the choir of feminism than the accused and he publicly denounced me for being anti-feminist and said "women DO get raped and it's men like YOU who expound the false accusation myth that enable rapists to get away with it"...what say you now sir? He did fourteen years worth of I told you so.
Re:Absurd and Unjust (Score:2)
by Luek on 02:48 AM March 13th, 2004 EST (#5)
(User #358 Info)
The irony was...nobody ever sang any louder in the choir of feminism than the accused and he publicly denounced me for being anti-feminist and said "women DO get raped and it's men like YOU who expound the false accusation myth that enable rapists to get away with it"...what say you now sir? He did fourteen years worth of I told you so.

  • Just goes to show that some men are so confused and befuddled by misandric feminism that they actually will kiss their chains. Hard to feel pity for them!
  • Re:Absurd and Unjust (Score:0)
    by Anonymous User on 02:37 AM March 12th, 2004 EST (#3)
    "A defendant's past is frequently brought into question...and the "accuser" in this case could easily wind up as a defendant. If this case exposes the "accuser" as a fraud, I would love to see her name and crime posted on the headlines of every major newspaper in this country."

    If you look at all the men who have been freed of murder, rape, etc. through DNA evidence, it boggles the mind to think how many more must be there (jail) falsely, but will never have the opportunity of DNA evidence to free them. I say, "A hard crack down on female false accusers is long overdue." I say, "To hell with rape shield laws, etc. Let the Truth be told." The time is long over do for lying females falsely accusing rape, domestic violence, paternity fraud, child abuse, sexual harassment, etc. to do hard time.

    (click) Lying Females

    Ray

    (Please do not scroll up the page of the linked items. All the info I am trying to convey is only as the page comes up initially.)


    Kate Faber (Score:2)
    by Luek on 08:34 PM March 12th, 2004 EST (#4)
    (User #358 Info)
    A defendant's past is frequently brought into question...and the "accuser" in this case could easily wind up as a defendant. If this case exposes the "accuser" as a fraud, I would love to see her name and crime posted on the headlines of every major newspaper in this country.

    The "accuser's" name is Katelyn Kristine Faber as most of the world knows by now.


    Re:Kate Faber (Score:0)
    by Anonymous User on 11:01 AM March 13th, 2004 EST (#6)
    Unfortunately, most of the world does not know this b/c most of the major media outlets are observing the gag order. Plus, she has not been charged with any crime yet.

    It would, in fact, be nice to see her name splashed all over newspaper headlines if Kobe Bryant is found innocent. "KATELYN FABER LIED, Charges to be filed".
    Re:Kate Faber (Score:2)
    by Luek on 04:16 PM March 13th, 2004 EST (#7)
    (User #358 Info)
    Unfortunately, most of the world does not know this b/c most of the major media outlets are observing the gag order. Plus, she has not been charged with any crime yet.

    Why must the accuser be anonymous when the accused whom is presumed innocent has his name splashed all over the media? Most crime cases have the names of the accused and the accuser known to the public even murder cases. Kate Faber is an adult and not a minor child who may or may not have been sexually assaulted. She and other women like her should have their names published if the accusee has his name published. I think Men's News Daily has adopted this approach when reporting on the Kobe/Faber case. And good for them in so doing it!

    [an error occurred while processing this directive]