This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is advice for women on how to handle men. And it's just a lead-in for MSN's match-making service: commercialism at it's best.
While I'm glad that they've finally figured out how to avoid being negative about men, it's a shame that they're only doing it for commercial gain. (Not that I'm against commercial gain, you understand. I am a free-marketer at heart. I'm just disappointed that this is the only case in which Bill Gates & Co. find it useful to be positive toward men.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I was really happy to see how the article viewed what men mean. I don't always like my wife to be "needy" or "intense". I love her very much, I want her to bear my children, but I also need for her to back off and let me breath so that I don't feel smothered.
I like the article didn't blame men for being how we are. There was no "Peter Pan" syndrome mentioned, no "commitment phobia", and no "men are unable to connect with their feelings" crap.
If I were to explain to a woman, or try to, on how I needed space I would say it like I say it to my wife: "in the same way that you don't want me grabbing on intimate parts of you when you are not in the mood, as it makes you feel intruded on, that is how men feel when you relentlessly invade our feelings."
I think that analogy works for me and has be well received by women when I tried to explain it to them.
Nice article
Peace
Steven Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|