|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One is a second degree, and one fourth? What is the difference? Why the difference? I don't blame the attorney prosecuting, because obviously these kids needed some help in their family situations. Why are charges not being brought to their parents? Is there a 'bad parenting' charge yet? Like a misdemeanor?
"Trust will kill you or set you free." -unknown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, because the second degree is on the male, who is always the victimizer, andd the 4th degree is on the female, who is always the victim.
* Putting the SMACKDOWN on Feminazis since 1989! *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That is the easy answer that takes no thought, and even less evidence. I was wondering about the serious answer, the one the lawyers justify.
"Trust will kill you or set you free." -unknown
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That is the serious answer. You will consistantly find lighter sentences women for the same crime, and lesser charges for the same action. Try and find, outside of this Board and its cousins, a random set of a dozen people who will affirm that a woman can rape a man.
Yours is the easy dismissal that takes no thought, and pleads at semantics. Look at the big picture and see what it demonstrates.
* Putting the SMACKDOWN on Feminazis since 1989! *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's possible that the girl pleaded to the lesser charge to get it over with.
Not sure if she was in custody or not. Sounds like they both have criminal records already and it's being used agaisnt them.
Sounds like the boy might be tuffing it out and not willing to plead. If thats true, god bless him.
I'd like to see the Supreme Court's descision on this. It will seriously affect wether or not I buy a gun.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well it did say she was naked and made no reference to his state of attire. If he was dressed wouldn't that be greater evidence of sexual intent on her part?
cheers,
--sd.
Those who like this sort of thing
will find this the sort of thing they like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What can I say? This is just ludicrous.
Why do parents want to prosecute their own kids? Why should taxpayers be paying to prosecute kids the same age for having (or considering having) consensual sex?
This is just weird. And it makes a mockery of the Statuatory Rape laws, the intent of which is to prosecute ADULTS who sexually exploit minors or children.
How can two people rape each other, statuatory or otherwise? The mind boggles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
""""""""The boy is being held in secure detention on a charge of attempted second-degree sexual assault, a felony that carries a possible juvenile prison term.The girl pleaded guilty to fourth degree sexual assault, a misdemeanor, but is charged with violating her probation; a warrant has been issued for her arrest.""""""""""""""
1. Why is the 14 year old boy being held under more serious charges than the 14 year old girl? Does this imply the state believes that males even as young as 14 are more mentally mature and therefore more responsible than a female of the same age?
2. What is society going to do with all the millions of little boys and little girls between the ages of 4 and 10 years old who play "doctor's office" and "show me yours and I will show you mine?" Arrest them and prosecute them with molestation when they reach age 21? Of course the males will be prosecuted under more extreme penalties since they are so much more responsible than females.
3. And just where do these ding bat prosecutors get off saying they are prosecuting these 14 year olds to help them not hurt them? This is just "NUTS" and we taxpayers are paying for this shit?
"More harm, misery and injustice has been inflicted on our culture and civilization by bastards in black robes than was ever inflicted by anyone wearing a white one."
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
