|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
touch with Wendell Sherk Attorney At Law. He can get that thing annulled, and set this guy free. He doesn't need a honeymoon, he needs to see the big red warning sign and walk away.
I've seen plenty of those types when I worked out at the air force base. Guys would come home and find their entire place smashed and a note that said "I left for Kenny cause he's more of a man than you". Sucks when they just got back from several months somewhere else in the world.
I hope he wakes up and doesn't learn that one the hard way.
Freedom Is Merely Privilege Extended Unless Enjoyed By One & All.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Friday August 22, @07:34PM EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
If this guy doesn't get out of this marriage immediately he is very foolish.
If this sort of thing happens again and she calls the police and lies, the husband will be going away for a long time.
I wonder how many tens of thousands of women who carry on like this and inflict injuries on themselves are listed as official victims of domestic violence after they get exploitive and drop a dime on their unsuspecting husband?
Domestic violence is the biggest scam in
America today, and this story is just one more proof of how violent, abusive and unaccoutnable women in Feminasty-America truly are.
Ray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Friday August 22, @10:06PM EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
Um, off topic a bit, but just what the heck was an 18-year-old doing getting married in the first place??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*muses* My boyfriend's parents have been hinting strongly that my boyfriend and I should get married "before it's too late" and such. :P They seem to be the only interested parties, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"My boyfriend's parents have been hinting strongly that my boyfriend and I should get married "before it's too late""
Yeah but they're older and wise enough to know that if he passes you up he might not ever find another catch as good. Be careful, they might drive the two of you to a drive through chapel, hoping you'll think "as long as we're here..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with the general consensus - I really hope he gets out of that marriage. Though I really doubt that was the first taste of 'marital bliss' that poor guy came across.
Ironically, I'm watching Chicago at this very moment. I'd like to reproduce the "He Had it Coming" song with men, see if I win any Oscars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Saturday August 23, @01:01AM EST (#6)
|
|
|
|
|
Go for it. The only way we'll stop the battering of men will be by showing the big double standard.
Women are given a free pass when they committ sexist bias and abuse against men, but reversing the roles and highlighting their misandry might just be the shock needed to illuminate the bigotry in these feminist duulards' minds
Ray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Ironically, I'm watching Chicago at this very moment. I'd like to reproduce the "He Had it Coming" song with men, see if I win any Oscars."
Actually I think that movie works against women as a class. It shines light on their not so innocent roles in situations. It shows how they "get away with it" because they are girls.
I think the men's movement should reconsider the messages in this movie. And encourage other men to watch it.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Actually I think that movie works against women as a class. It shines light on their not so innocent roles in situations. It shows how they "get away with it" because they are girls. "
But their less than innocent roles are glamorized, I don't think the immediate result will be people saying "gee, even though I'm being conditioned to like them, it enlightens me to a social reality I'd been trying to ignore."
>I think the men's movement should reconsider the >messages in this movie. And encourage other men >to watch it.
I wouldn't encourage them to pay for it, though. :P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think we need to be careful with this. It is a story about one young woman who got drunk on her wedding day and acted like an ass. It's a sad story but I don't think it leaves us much room to generalize about women.
The story doesn't mention the new husbands' actions. We simply don't know a thing about the other side of this story...and that is what the media does repeatedly, tells you one side. They are in the business to create news that sells. They are not solely in business to tell the truth. This is exactly how the media has told just one side of the DV story. The female side. People buy it. This sucks.
Just imagine a tabloid type story on the NOW web site about a young man who became drunk and abusive on his wedding night. All the fems pile on saying things about men in general and telling all women to look out, their guy might act like that too. Would we see this as bigoted? I would.
Stand Your Ground Forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHat can be generalized is the deplorable tendancy of a majority of women to think that their femininity will keep them from being called to account for their actions - and sadly, the deplorable tendancy of many men to prove them right.
We often hear about "boys will be boys" but it strikes me as odd that we cut a lot more slack on the basis of "girls will be girls." The feminist proclivity for attacking men with the "boys will be boys" canard is, I think, called projection.
We can play nice, not rock the boat, and not do anything radical or revolutionary in regards to changing this, step one of which is pointing out that not only can girls be assholes too, it's not in fact uncommon at all. Truth be told, the ratio of asswipe to real human being is the same in both genders. But, hey, if we're just gonna go along to get along - why bother?
* Putting the SMACKDOWN on Feminazis since 1989! *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Saturday August 23, @10:23AM EST (#10)
|
|
|
|
|
"but I don't think it leaves us much room to generalize about women."
Actually it does. The diparity is glaring between the way a man would have been treated and how this woman was treated. Gee Whiz, the cops probably would have just shot a man doing this numerous times and been done with it.
Women do things like this all the time and the only reason this made the news was the wedding day connection.
Police excuse women who batter big time and batter men who have been battered by women by, arresting them based on their feminazi training. Men are "primary aggressors" often simply because they are physically bigger in size so the fact they are the victims of d.v. is irrelevant in today's nazi police state called america.
Wake up and smell the prejudice and hate toward men that is a strong undercurrent in this story.
That's not a generalization, it's just the way things are under feminazi domestic violence laws.
I know we're suppossed to talk nice and discuss our issues in flowery and euphamistic phrases, but I just thought it was more important to be open and honest, than some gentlemanly model of protocol and decorum. Many men's issues like d.v., prison rape, child stealing through law, etc. are ugly, obscence and raw edged and best described in the language that honestly commmunicates the true horror. Just my opinion.
Sincerely, Ray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom said: "but I don't think it leaves us much room to generalize about women."
Ray said: "Actually it does. The diparity is glaring between the way a man would have been treated and how this woman was treated. Gee Whiz, the cops probably would have just shot a man doing this numerous times and been done with it."
Actually it doesn't. They arrested her and put her in jail for the night which is most likely what they would have done to a man.
I know there are glaring differences in the ways men and women are treated by law enforcement and the courts. I just don't see this article as a great example of those differences or a valid example with which to generalize. This is a tabloid article and nothing more. Drawing conclusions about men's rights or misandry from the "Enquirer" is not the best of ideas.
Stand Your Ground Forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Saturday August 23, @05:30PM EST (#12)
|
|
|
|
|
"They arrested her and put her in jail for the night which is most likely what they would have done to a man."
Not in California. A man would be charged with a felony and looking at 7 years.
A woman would have gotten less than the woman in this article.
Ray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think it shows plenty of dispartity.
If that was a man, they would of been MACED, beat with NIGHTSTICKS, and charged with FELONY assault of an officer, and/or intent to transfer bodily fluids for the purpose of injury (20+ year felony my state).
And no man would get a sissy 1000$ bond after that either, not in the county I am from.
Freedom Is Merely Privilege Extended Unless Enjoyed By One & All.
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
