Y-Not? Human Males May Last, After All

	posted by Hombre on Wednesday August 20, @03:26PM from the rebuttals dept.
	tparker writes "A BBC article offering counter arguments in the "Y-Males? Y-Not!" debate here. Some interesting information on the decoding of the Y chromosome, and indications that human males may be around a bit longer."

<  A Change In Media Trend??? | NCFM and others to host Warren Farrell Rally  >

  

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Curious... (Score:1) by Hunsvotti on Wednesday August 20, @04:23PM EST (#1) (User #573 Info) The radfems aren't really strong enough to actually do away with us, so they're... what... trying to imagine us away?

Re:Curious... (Score:1) by tparker on Wednesday August 20, @05:43PM EST (#2) (User #65 Info) Perhaps in the world of Gender-Feminism, wishes really do come true - if you have sufficient faith, believe your Woman's Studies professor, and can take it to court. Look what wishes have done for them so far, when expressed strongly enough. With any luck, the Gen-Fems will succeed in imagining us away - in their own minds. Then we can quietly lead them away to a nice place with a 14-foot high fence around the grounds, and they can be happy all the time.....

Here's Another Good Article... (Score:1) by hobbes on Wednesday August 20, @06:12PM EST (#3) (User #537 Info) http://www.nature.com/nsu/030616/030616-16.html Dr. Page seems to be the antithesis to Bryan Stykes. Good read. Google lists numerous recent articles based on Page's work in sequencing the Y. Too bad, Maureen Dowd. Back to the drawing board, huh?

[an error occurred while processing this directive]