|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If all the men disappeared tomorrow, the women would be in serious trouble. No one to take care of the power grid, the drinking water system, the waste water system, to build the homes, to build the roads, to lay the gas pipe, to maintain the computer networks, to maintain the phone system.
Most of the engineers in the world are men, most of the patents ever issued for inventions went to men, 99%+ of the real work in maintaining & creating the infrastructure of the world is done by men.
Sometimes I think men should go on strike for a month. If we could just get every man to do it for one month -- we could watch all of the systems collapse and fail -- and most of this BS would stop right then & there.
Freedom Is Merely Privilege Extended Unless Enjoyed By One & All.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After all, women have already unionized... (rolls eyes)
I think a union of men could be a very powerful tool. It would show all the feminist twits how wonderful it would be to live without all these horrible male-created problems, such as electricity, vaccination, running hot and cold water, and the Internet.
The trouble is, how do we get enough men on board to make an impact? If we wait too long, it'll be too late.
In the meantime, keep supporting the sperm cartel!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
That does sound a lot like socialism, and does happen a lot in France.
Anyways, I was thinking of Orwell's book 84, which is my favorite to comparison's to stuff like this when it comes up.
First off, reducing the world to only 10% of the male population will do only one thing, put men into total charge of the world authoritarily.
In order to keep men down they would have to genetically egineer men to be weaker, but obviously this won't happen. They will realize they need strong men to run the show. So guess who will be in charge of this new world order? It will be the Ayrian Race (please don't crticize my spelling).
As soon as they start to decide whose defective and who is not, I gurantee you it will wind down to just that. It is no coincidence that feminists and nazis are similiar, no coincidence at all.
10% of the population of men will be, 2% as the rulers, and 8% of men who will be the outside party, to doers, the police, the builders of bridges, the maintenance men.
Women, will be meaningless lowlevel slaves for the most part. None of them will be innerparty members, some will be outter party members and nearly all of them will be mass informants raised to tattle tale on everyone and everything.
Sounds a lot like what Russia was heading for, and what Canada is trying to become (and almost is right now) right now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
please don't crticize my spelling
Don't worry about it, Dan.
Anyone, who is familiar with Web discussion boards, knows that the standards for grammar and spelling on the boards are much lower than in, for instance, the publishing of articles. It's like engaging in a discussion or debate at a social gathering. If, in preparing every statement, you took the same amount of time that you would take, if you were sending an article to a magazine or Webzine for publication, you'd never say anything. I've encountered, on a number of occasions, people in bulletin board debates resorting to attacks on another person's grammar or spelling. In just about every case, even among those who generally agreed on points being argued by the person who attacked the writing, a number of people state that the attack is lame and irrelevant at best and that it often reveals an insecurity in the mind of the person attacking the spelling or grammar.
It reminds me of the line from "Catch 22." "'Why the hell not?' Yossarian snarled, arguing all the more vehemently because he suspected he was wrong."
On these boards, it's best to make your point and move on, as long as your point it clear. When you post here, you're part of a discussion. You're not writing for archival publication.
Cheers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Tuesday September 09, @05:40PM EST (#10)
|
|
|
|
|
This is the dumbest heap of misogynistic bullshit I've read in quite awhile. You are using the goofy, time-worn 19th Century argument that males invented everything and accomplished everything there is to invent and accomplish simply because they have that ugly thing hanging betwen their legs. News flash! There are plenty of womyn in engineering, medicine, science, in construction, skilled trades, business, commerce, computing, and so forth, to keep the ball rolling if men got beamed up out of womyn's hair. The fact remains that men are not, and never have been, the glue that holds this world together. If anything, men are violent, exploitative, and destructive. If men were to disappear from society, not only would society continue as it was due to the skills, talents and abilities of the remaining womyn, we'd have no need for the amount of prisons we now have, or of a police force for that matter. Womyn would be able to walk the streets in safety and confidence without fear of rape and violence, oppression in the workplace and elsewhere would cease, eating disorders would dissipate due to lack of male pressure towards an impossible beauty standard, and war would become rare or nonexistent. Womyn now outnumber men in university classrooms and this trend is continuing at breakneck speed. What's it all mean in the long run? This dumbing down of men also means that womyn are holding more and more professional degrees and are becoming more and more educated and literate while men are becoming more and more unlettered, untrained, and ignorant. The increased training and knowledge womyn have amassed will put them in ever increasing positions of power and is helping them to fill the positions you state are only occupied by men. Even if this was the case, with future generations of males being increasingly uneducated and untrained, it won't be long before womyn are actually "running everything." It makes men sick with rage that womyn do not need men in the same way men need womyn. Men cannot create and nurture life as womyn can. Only a womyn can choose to carry the male's body to term and give him life or not, not the other way around, and it enrages men that they don't have the same power over life and death as womyn do. Hence, you have absurd arguments like these where men tell themselves they've created and accomplished everything. I think it all stems from your grief and rage at not having been born female.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Tuesday August 12, @03:44PM EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
There is another similarity not often alluded to. The picures occasionally smuggled out of the abortion "clinics" remind me of the photographs which followed the liberation of Auschwitz. In both cases the slaughter followed a campaign of dehumanisation of a section of humanity. In both cases, human beings were sometimes thrown into the furnaces while still alive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wasn't the fact that simple language errors detract from mens' sites credibility a thread last week?
--sd.
Those who like this sort of thing
will find this the sort of thing they like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's "reich", nimrod
Wasn't the fact that simple language errors detract from mens' sites credibility a thread last week?
You really need to grow up. Rest assured, son. It's been corrected.
Do you drink a lot?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You really need to grow up. Rest assured, son. It's been corrected.
Do you drink a lot?
I see my criticisms of your arguments have struck a nerve. It's a pity when people who are supposed to be on the same side resort to childish name calling instead of discussing the issues.
cheers,
Tim
Those who like this sort of thing
will find this the sort of thing they like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
see my criticisms of your arguments have struck a nerve. It's a pity when people who are supposed to be on the same side resort to childish name calling instead of discussing the issues.
Childish name calling? Take a look at the title of the subthread that you started, Smoking Drive.
If you don't want to be called on your childish behavior, don't start out by calling someone "Nimrod."
If you're going to blame someone else for your behavior, you're going to have to do better.
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
