|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Saturday July 26, @08:37PM EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
I'll remember this next time my hands are dirty.
I'm proud to be a man, and feminist hate just reminds me why.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, I liked Paul Robbins' essay about the contributions and sacrifices of men. Nicely written.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A great article. One of the things I like to do when I get into an argument with my (feminist) sister is to point out that women didn't want any part of equality in the workplace until men made enough progress that it was actually easy enough for a woman. If she tries to shoot down all of mens' accomplishments I usually just ask her to name one thing (with moving parts) that was invented by a woman. And yes, I know that the windshield wiper was invented by a woman, but she doesn't so please don't tell her.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Saturday July 26, @11:49PM EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
Silly women, they only try to shoot down The Great Accomplishments of Men, because they are jelous, lol. It's so obvious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Today, some women look upon the softness of their own hands and believe themselves nobler and finer. They believe that clean hands make a clean conscience. Their search for moral superiority leads them to stand on the sidelines, taking no blame for the ills of the world while certain they deserve credit for its good.
And to these women I quote the man George Bernard Shaw who correctly stated that "the absent are always wrong."
In this sense, it seems that women who think in sexist terms would do well to follow the time-tested method of becoming great by supporting great men, while those who claim to believe more in "individual expresion" are contradicting themselves if they blame men as a group.
The obvious point here is that these feminists simply take men for granted like animals, i.e. talented beasts who serve a mere purpose, while they have some mystical quality which renders them superior, when the truth is simply psychological, i.e. women are mainly a man's means of providing grounding and perspective in his life in order to maintain a stable orientation and equilibrium, but that men today are brainwashed by a conflicted society away from emotional independence.
And is it any coincidence that the Great American disasters followed the time that women were allowed to vote for weak, socialistic and maternal men in the 20's and afterward?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Sunday July 27, @01:58PM EST (#7)
|
|
|
|
|
I can't think of anything with moving parts that was invented by a woman . Nor can I think of anything without moving parts that was invented by a woman. We used to be told that the reason that all great thinkers were male was because women were denied access to education. Well, over the past 30 years the world's universities have been churning out women graduates like McDonalds churns out burgers. And what has been the result? All of these women have been responsible for about as much creative and innovative thinking as your average quarter pounder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Sunday July 27, @10:19PM EST (#8)
|
|
|
|
|
Well said mate.
Top marks!
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
