[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Now here's something you don't see every day
posted by Adam on Saturday May 10, @05:35PM
from the News dept.
News Freebird writes "A judge actually getting punished for condoning the statutory rape of a 13 year old boy by his former teacher. ""Gaeta said he didn't see the harm in the sexual encounters. "It's just something between two people that clicked beyond the teacher-student relationship," he said." Yeah, sure judge. Would that pervert - which is exactly what he is - say the same if a male teacher had done the same with a female student? We all know the answer to that one. Here is the article Even better is the fact that people actually got UPSET about this judge's leniency with the teacher. Society is, although slowly, coming around to the fact that women who have sex with little boys are indeed sexual predators, and should be treated as such."

Are you SINK SCUM? | 1984  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Sorry, already posted (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Saturday May 10, @05:50PM EST (#1)
It looks like we have a double posting, as someone else submitted this same article and it was posted earlier.

The more the merrier?

  - Freebird
Double Posting (Score:1)
by Dittohd on Saturday May 10, @07:19PM EST (#2)
(User #1075 Info)
Here's the first one, also posted today.

Dittohd

At least Diehl-Moore is serving time. (Score:1)
by Mars (olaf_stapledon@yahoo.com) on Sunday May 11, @06:26PM EST (#3)
(User #73 Info)
The judge made the comments during the May 2002 sentencing of Pamela Diehl-Moore, 43, of Lyndhurst, who pleaded guilty to sexual assault charges for engaging in a relationship with a 13-year-old former student.

Gaeta said he didn't see the harm in the sexual encounters. "It's just something between two people that clicked beyond the teacher-student relationship," he said.

Diehl-Moore had agreed to a three-year prison term, but Gaeta gave her probation. Following the comments, Gaeta was reassigned to civil court and the defendant was resentenced to three years in prison.


At least Diehl-Moore is serving time in prison for sexual assault of a 13-year old. That's a step in the right direction.
Re:At least Diehl-Moore is serving time. (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Monday May 12, @12:01AM EST (#4)
I have a question.
Does anyone here think that maybe there is a heck of a lot more of this 'female teacher on under-age male student' thing going on, than the media is letting on?
I have noticed in the past when a woman does something wrong the main stream media seems to sit on the story. They tend to 'break the news' after "alternative-media" has reported it a number of times.
It may just be my imagination, but that's how it seems to me.

Hmm, If one didn't know better one might think I don't trust the media.
...Go figure.

-Thundercloud.

"HOKA HEY!"
Re:At least Diehl-Moore is serving time. (Score:1)
by CPM on Monday May 12, @09:05AM EST (#5)
(User #769 Info)
Thundercloud,

There is definitely more of it going on. It is not just your imagination. I used to read the "arrests" section in my local newspaper. This is the section where they list the people "charged with" not "convicted of" crimes in the local area. These are not articles, but merely rosters of the daily arrest reports, with the name, address, age, and offense commited by the alleged perpetrators.

There are always both female and male suspects listed for sex crimes, but any time there is a male suspect of a sex crime, there is also a corresponding story on another page(usually page 1 or 2) trying to sell how disgusting the male is.

Of the few cases(of male suspects) that I have been able to actually follow through on, all but one were eventually found not guilty. There is NEVER a follow-up story to state this fact.

Of the female suspects, I have yet to see even one corresponding story to even attempt to describe what happened. It is merely glossed over. I am making no ascertions as to whether these females are guilty or not, but the simple fact that the newspaper will not even do a story on it, as they always do for the males, speaks volumes as to their bias.

My point here, even though it may not be clear, is that I see many people charged with sex crimes(men and women) IN MY LOCAL AREA! Who knows if this is representative of the rest of the nation or not?!? The media makes a huge deal out of the male story, and downplays the female story.

Hell, I have only been in my current house for two years now and have already received two of those sex offender notifications. That means there are two people within blocks of my house that have been CONVICTED of sex crimes and are now free. By the way, one is male and one is female! There's your "equality" grrls...
[an error occurred while processing this directive]