[an error occurred while processing this directive]
NH Senate Passes Men's Commission Bill - Updated
posted by Scott on Wednesday April 10, @07:32PM
from the news dept.
News I've just found out that the NH Senate passed HB 587, to establish a NH Men's Commission! The vote was 13-10. Getting a roll call vote was essential on passing this bill, as we suspect there were a few people who changed their vote when they knew they would be held personally accountable for it. I'll provide more details in the next day or two. Update: The NH Union Leader printed this article today offering some more details about the passage of the bill.

Audio of Sacks, Angelucci KABC Appearance Now Available | Study: Male Circumcision Healthy...For Women  >

  
'NH Senate Passes Men's Commission Bill - Updated' | Login/Create an Account | 30 comments | Search Discussion
Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. Mensactivism.org is not responsible for them in any way.
Very nice! (Score:1)
by bledso on Wednesday April 10, @08:55PM EST (#1)
(User #215 Info)
Excellent news! I really hope other states are paying attention.
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
  • Re:Very nice! by warble (Score:1) Thursday April 11, @08:58PM EST
Extremely Good News (Score:1)
by Dan-Lynch on Wednesday April 10, @08:59PM EST (#2)
(User #722 Info)
This should be celebrated in the Men's Movement, but also treated very delicately as it is in a fragile state. This could stand to be a stable step forward for the issues of men and the well being of the whole community. A stampede of congradualations should go to those who worked to make this happen, men and women alike.
Dan Lynch, a lover of women.
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
How'd You Get Roll Call Vote? (Score:1)
by warble on Wednesday April 10, @09:41PM EST (#3)
(User #643 Info)
Getting a roll call vote was essential on passing this bill
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
Foward Motion (Score:1)
by DanCurry on Wednesday April 10, @10:31PM EST (#5)
(User #245 Info)
Now men in NH can push forward from more and more funding of research to counter some of the years of bogus reports boasted by the feminists.
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
Eating The Elephant One Bite At A Time (Score:1)
by Luek on Wednesday April 10, @10:34PM EST (#6)
(User #358 Info)
This is good news! Congratulations Scott. The vote was not a landslide; 13 for 10 against. A pretty close shave! With the passage of anti- paternity fraud legislation in Georgia and similar legislation pending in other states, we are devouring the huge elephant of misandry one bite at a time.

Keep at it!
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
Great News! (Score:1)
by Tom on Thursday April 11, @08:24AM EST (#14)
(User #192 Info)
Great News Scott!

I wonder if there is any way to get info on this to send to our respective state legislators and say "Hey! Look what NH is doing, how bout us???"

Good stuff. Thanks Scott for all you do.
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
NH (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Thursday April 11, @08:34AM EST (#15)
Is NH the only state that has a specific Bill for men?
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
The Politics of Men's Issues (Score:1)
by equalitarian62 on Thursday April 11, @11:29AM EST (#19)
(User #267 Info)
Does anybody know if one party has been more supportive of men's issues than the other? I know that the bill for the Office of Men's Health was proposed by a Republican in California and that Democrats have traditionally been supported by feminists, but the distinction seems to have blurred recently. Unfortunately, some of us are liberal on some issues and conservative on others, which makes it hard to pick a party to support.

Steve
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
Ir remains to be seen. (Score:1)
by proudman on Thursday April 11, @01:17PM EST (#20)
(User #720 Info)
It is still not to late for this commission to be hijacked by the feminutzis and turned into a "Men's Commission on how you all can better serve your mistresses properly, you sexist pigs."

The price of this victory is perpetual vigilance against such a forseeable happening.
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
Please Tell Me It Isn't So (Score:2)
by Thomas on Friday April 12, @09:47AM EST (#25)
(User #280 Info)
After rereading this article a little more slowly, I'm not so sure this commission a good thing. Note that according to the article "Boyce said the bill will not cost the state any money even though a financial analysis on the bill predicts annual costs of more than $60,000. Boyce said those assume personnel, office and operating costs that are not planned." Does this mean that the commission will be a sham that allows the state to pretend that it's doing something about men's issues while doing nothing? Perhaps I missed something and the idea is that funding will come entirely from private sources. How can the commission operate with no personnel, no office, and no funds to cover operating expenses?

Also, equalitarian62 asked, "Does anybody know if one party has been more supportive of men's issues than the other?" This article gives us a little insight at least about this case, "Republicans used their majority power to pass the measure," and later says "Democrats argued that there can be no comparison between the problems of women that led to a Commission on the Status of Women, and those that men face."
[ Reply to This | Parent ]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]