[an error occurred while processing this directive]
A Man Is Battered Every 14 Seconds
posted by Nightmist on Friday March 22, @01:51PM
from the domestic-violence dept.
Domestic Violence This commentary in the Washington Times seems to be the author's mea culpa for ignoring male victims of domestic violence in a previous column. He had reported that a woman is battered every 15 seconds, but completely failed to mention the male statistic, which was in the very same study. This rousing omission was not lost on my readers. Shortly after the commentary ran, letters streamed — poured — into our office documenting acts of domestic violence committed against men. The accounts were tied together by a common theme: the reluctance of men to come forward, for fear of being emasculated. The author also admits he purposefully neglected to mention male victims as a result of his adherence to "longstanding cultural myths." It's good to see this kind of admission of neglect in print. Williams is a nationally syndicated columnist.

Source: Washington Times [newspaper]

Title: Notes on husband abuse

Author: Armstrong Williams

Date: March 22, 2002

Raising Money to Publicize Warren Farrell's Latest Book | History Channel Smears Men  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
glad the retraction got in (Score:1)
by crescentluna (evil_maiden@yahoo.com) on Friday March 22, @02:29PM EST (#1)
(User #665 Info)
Despite this silly excuses of "we didn't have enough room" and "you see, it was my cultural programming" [does anyone believe it isn't because the idea of mentioning domestic violence against men exists wouldn't be popular?] I am glad they turned around and pointed out their error.
Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:1, Informative)
by warble (activistwarble@yahoo.com) on Friday March 22, @03:06PM EST (#2)
(User #643 Info)
I am glad that the retraction was printed. However, the author is referencing older studies and ignores newer studies on DV.

I should also note that Gelles studies on male victims of DV are intentionally being underfunded.
This would account for an apparent derth in newer references.


Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:1)
by Luek on Saturday March 23, @04:08PM EST (#13)
(User #358 Info)
Warble,

How is your own personal problem with domestic violence working out?


Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Sunday March 24, @02:37AM EST (#16)
How is your own personal problem with domestic violence working out?

As the feminist would say. The honeymoon period is over, and now she is starting the cycle again. She has started in with the emotional abuse. Of course, nothing she said is really emotionally abusive.

Now she is taking it to the next level and preparing for the physical violence. It can take any form.

At this point she has started the taking off without warning behavior.


Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Sunday March 24, @03:08AM EST (#17)
How is your own personal problem with domestic violence working out?

Now she has become more violent in a matter of a few minutes. She banged her purse on a table and caused me to experience extreme fear. I was afraid that she would start throwing objects like in the past.

I pointed out the violence and as usual I am at fault.

warble


Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Sunday March 24, @12:42PM EST (#21)
Now she has become more violent in a matter of a few minutes. She banged her purse on a table and caused me to experience extreme fear. I was afraid that she would start throwing objects like in the past.

I pointed out the violence and as usual I am at fault.


Odd. Last night my wife was becoming progressively more violent by the minute. Everything I tried to deescalate her violent behavior failed. I walked away, talked calmly, and isolated myself and yet all of those actions would seem to cause her to become more violent.

However, when she saw me posting that last message, she got scared and stopped immediately. Damn. I cannot call the police because all that will happen is that she will lie and they will arrest me.

Nevertheless, if I post to this message board detailing the violence then she stops. Go figure. I discovered this quite by accident. I was just responding to another posters question.

Scott. Sorry, to use this group like that last night. However, your board is more powerful and effective then the local police. It was literally the only thing I could do to stop her from becoming more violent.


Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:2)
by Nightmist (nightmist@mensactivism.org) on Sunday March 24, @01:02PM EST (#22)
(User #187 Info)
Scott. Sorry, to use this group like that last night. However, your board is more powerful and effective then the local police. It was literally the only thing I could do to stop her from becoming more violent.

I can't speak for Scott, but considering your post is both important to your safety and also happens to be on-topic, I welcome it, especially if it's keeping you from being brutalized.

Warble, I have some questions I'd like you ask you in a private e-mail for a column I'm working on. If you've got a Hotmail account or some other account to protect your anonymity, e-mail me at nightmist@mensactivism.org. If you can't get back to me today (Sunday), then don't worry about it, but if you can, that would be great.

Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:1)
by warble (activistwarble@yahoo.com) on Monday March 25, @03:27PM EST (#38)
(User #643 Info)
I have some questions I'd like you ask you in a private e-mail for a column I'm working on.

I have gotten a lot of request for anonymous correspondence. So, I have set up the following account:

activistwarble@yahoo.com

warble

Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:1)
by Scott (scott@mensactivism.org) on Monday March 25, @08:36AM EST (#24)
(User #3 Info)
Warble,

I'm glad you were able to avoid a violent confrontation this time, but the tactic is unlikely to work forever. I really hope you can find the resources to get emotional help through this struggle and to get out of this relationship, soon.

If I recall correctly, you're from Canada, right? Not sure which province, but perhaps the Volksgaren could be of help in offering advice:

http://clix.to/support/

tel: 519-773-9644
email: jaxom@amtelecom.net

Scott
Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:1)
by wiccid stepparent on Monday March 25, @01:10PM EST (#31)
(User #490 Info)
If banging one's purse onto the table is now considered domestic abuse, color me violent.

While being cautious is a necessity, I might advise not making the same overreactions that women "victims" of abuse make.
Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:2)
by Nightmist (nightmist@mensactivism.org) on Monday March 25, @01:35PM EST (#32)
(User #187 Info)
If banging one's purse onto the table is now considered domestic abuse, color me violent.

I should point out, Wiccid (in case Warble doesn't), that "banging her purse on the table" isn't the only indication of violence he's experienced. Frankly, it sounds like she was giving him a "warning shot."

Warble has written here several times about the abuse he suffers. Look back through the archives and read his posts before you judge him.

Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:1)
by wiccid stepparent on Monday March 25, @02:08PM EST (#33)
(User #490 Info)
I am not judging him, I am cautioning him. We read a good many posts here of women who overreacted and got men arrested for nothing more than what is commonly called, here, "male anger". A woman banging her purse against a table is no more an arrestable offense than a man slamming a door.
Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:1)
by wiccid stepparent on Monday March 25, @02:09PM EST (#34)
(User #490 Info)
Or shouldn't be, I might add.
Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:2)
by Nightmist (nightmist@mensactivism.org) on Monday March 25, @02:26PM EST (#35)
(User #187 Info)
A woman banging her purse against a table is no more an arrestable offense than a man slamming a door.

Considering he's already written several times about how he feels about law enforcement's victimization of male victims of domestic violence, I doubt Warble would try to have her arrested for slamming her purse on the table.

Again, though, I would urge you to check out the history of what Warble has posted here about the violence in his life before assuming he's jumping to conclusions.

Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:1)
by warble (activistwarble@yahoo.com) on Monday March 25, @03:21PM EST (#37)
(User #643 Info)
A woman banging her purse against a table is no more an arrestable offense than a man slamming a door.

Also, if a husband reports to a psychologist or counciler that he is banging objects, the councilor is required by law to file a police report of that fact. Such men are considered dangerous and capable of DV, and yes this behavior can result in an arrest and charges if the women dials 911.


Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:1)
by wiccid stepparent on Monday March 25, @05:24PM EST (#43)
(User #490 Info)
Really. I find it absurd that any reasonable person would assume that because my husband slams a book onto the table, my head will be next. What state is this? And do you have the actual statute or code this refers to? Sounds draconian.
Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:2)
by Nightmist (nightmist@mensactivism.org) on Monday March 25, @05:38PM EST (#44)
(User #187 Info)
Really. I find it absurd that any reasonable person would assume that because my husband slams a book onto the table, my head will be next. What state is this? And do you have the actual statute or code this refers to? Sounds draconian.

I believe Warble is in Canada, actually, where Bill 117 has proclaimed that a man's property automatically becomes a woman's if he even so much as yells at her and she complains that "he made her afraid."

Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:1)
by wiccid stepparent on Monday March 25, @05:47PM EST (#45)
(User #490 Info)
Did that bill pass?

   
Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:2)
by Nightmist (nightmist@mensactivism.org) on Monday March 25, @05:52PM EST (#46)
(User #187 Info)
Did that bill pass?

I believe it did, but Warble or other Canadians on this site would be more qualified to answer that than I.

Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:1)
by warble (activistwarble@yahoo.com) on Monday March 25, @08:08PM EST (#48)
(User #643 Info)
Really. I find it absurd that any reasonable person would assume that because my husband slams a book onto the table, my head will be next. What state is this? And do you have the actual statute or code this refers to? Sounds draconian.

You can find these laws in virtually any state. Look up the domenstic laws and examine the topics of ex-parte restraining order and domestic violence.

Basically, they will specifically state that ANYTHING that causes a reasonable person (read woman) to experience fear is justifiable cause.

CA Code is found here:
CA Code

Specifically, for a restraining order in DV read 527.6 found here:

ex-parte restraining order

So, if you pound your purse on a table several times over a period (as you admit) it can be used to obtain a restraining order. It is a reasonable basis for obtaining an order because of the following phrases:

(2) "Credible threat of violence" is a knowing and willful statement or course of conduct that would place a reasonable person in fear for his or her safety, or the safety of his or her immediate family, and that serves no legitimate purpose.

(3) "Course of conduct" is a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose, including following or stalking an individual, making harassing telephone calls to an individual, or sending harassing correspondence to an individual by any means, including, but not limited to, the use of public or private mails, interoffice mail, fax, or computer e-mail.


So, pounding an object on a table is sufficient for a female to claim reasonable fear for self or family. It is therefore a solid basis for an ex-parte restraining order.

If women were treated equitably then pounding a purse (as you admit) would be sufficient to obtain a restraining order and have you evicted from your home. However, in todays hostile anti-male environment, the man would be laughed out of the courtroom. In practice, only women are able to obtain protection in such an example or claim such behavior is DV.

The laws in CO are even worse. They are closer to Canada than most any other State.


Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:1)
by warble (activistwarble@yahoo.com) on Monday March 25, @08:09PM EST (#49)
(User #643 Info)
I believe Warble is in Canada...

No I am in the U.S.


Status of Bill 117 (Score:1)
by Larry on Monday March 25, @08:33PM EST (#50)
(User #203 Info)
"Did that bill pass?

Evidently, it's in some sort of Canadian limbo, passed by the legislature, but not yet "proclaimed and implemented" by the government.

http://www.owjn.org/new/domup.htm
Re:Retraction - Lack of New Reference (Score:1)
by warble (activistwarble@yahoo.com) on Monday March 25, @03:17PM EST (#36)
(User #643 Info)
If banging one's purse onto the table is now considered domestic abuse, color me violent.

Let's try a roll reversal. In my state a woman is able to claim that she is in fear and obtain and ex-parte restraining order when the male bangs objects.

So, yes, by your admission, using the current legal standards, I believe that you are a violent person wiccid.

Is it absurd? No less absurd than a woman's ability to use this form of violence to boot a husband from the home.

warble


The truth comes out. (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Friday March 22, @04:43PM EST (#3)
men are violent to women but women are not violent to men...what a crock of propaganda!
My email was one of the "flood" of emails sent to Williams,good to see he has the decency to amend his story to reflect the TRUTH about women and how violent they really are.
Re:The truth comes out. (Score:1)
by warble (activistwarble@yahoo.com) on Friday March 22, @05:46PM EST (#6)
(User #643 Info)
....amend his story to reflect the TRUTH about women and how violent they really are.

Now if we could just get them to the front lines to fight a war......

Then the feminist might think twice about their agenda of male hatred.

But of course, putting them on the front line entails risks of capture, torture, and rape. Obviously, it is okay to violate men as an act of war, but not women. Gasp! Think of all the war babies that might be born.


My point. (Score:1)
by John Knouten on Friday March 22, @05:10PM EST (#4)
(User #716 Info)
Contacting the media REALLY HELPS. One more instance.


CONTACT THE MEDIA!
Re:My point. (Score:2)
by Marc Angelucci on Friday March 22, @05:35PM EST (#5)
(User #61 Info)
You're absolutely right. This is a good sign.
Re:My point. (Score:2)
by Nightmist (nightmist@mensactivism.org) on Friday March 22, @10:57PM EST (#11)
(User #187 Info)
Contacting the media REALLY HELPS. One more instance.

Absolutely. This column was a prime example of what a flood of mail to a columnist can achieve. As I mentioned, Williams is nationally syndicated, so the Washington Times isn't the only paper in which this column ran.

original article? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Friday March 22, @06:18PM EST (#7)
in so much as i'm happy that he admits his mistake, i can't seem to find a copy of the original article on either his personal website or washingtontimes.com. anyone have a copy in their cache i could take a look at?
Re:original article? (Score:1, Informative)
by Angry Harry on Friday March 22, @09:27PM EST (#9)
(User #195 Info)
http://www.townhall.com/columnists/Armstrongwillia ms/aw20020305.shtml
Re:original article? (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Friday March 22, @10:16PM EST (#10)
thanks harry.

brad
Maybe God was right to make us stronger (Score:1)
by Attila on Saturday March 23, @02:26AM EST (#12)
(User #685 Info)
So that we could survive the inherent violence of women...If it is supposed that women are more violent, and naturally manipulative, then my mind races ahead logically to a horrifying vision of the world being so terribly violent because of women almost entirely. This website hurts my head. If every 14 seconds a man is battered, and then one second later a woman is battered, then she swung first, and we have a pretty busy gender war going on. So much for peace on earth, crap.
Every 14 seconds... (Score:1)
by nazgul on Monday March 25, @10:22AM EST (#25)
(User #620 Info)
...A feminist quotes a misleading statistic.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]