[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Swift Accuses Her Critics of Gender Bias
posted by Scott on Monday March 04, @12:46PM
from the news dept.
News Anonymous User sent us this story from the Boston Globe and writes "Poor Jane Swift is playing the "gender card" claiming that powerful men are trying to undermine her next run for MA Governor. She knows that the Massachusetts press will eat this ploy up and and cast doubt on any man that runs against her now. Shameless... The poll at the end of the article shows that she has very low voter support. Maybe she should stick with the issues..." I do hope MA voters will show Swift and others that this kind of politics will not be supported.

Source: The Boston Globe [newspaper]

Title: Swift accuses her critics of gender bias

Author: Stephanie Ebbert and Frank Phillips

Date: March 1, 2002

Fathers Can Raise School Performance of Children | The Yates Defense Strikes Again, For Women Only  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
"Men in Power" are Oppressors. (Score:2, Insightful)
by johnpowers on Monday March 04, @01:48PM EST (#1)
(User #695 Info)
Yes. That's always the first cry of the femi-nazi, I've found. They can't seem to grasp the fact that sometimes the best person for the job isn't Them. It has nothing to do with gender. It's the fact that they're ineffective at their position.

What sort of work has Governor Swift accomplished, besides being 'A Powerful Womyn'? Honestly. I have no problem with a woman in office. Perhaps she's simply not capable of doing the job required of her, hence the Republican's seeking to replace her.

Frankly, that's probably the truth. It's not "Because she's a woman" that they're replacing her. It's probably "In spite of her being a woman". You can't replace a woman these days without most crying unfair treatment and oppression. I think it's time that the "Radical Feminists" (read as: Men haters) realized that we Aren't out to get them.


Women aren't better than men. Men aren't better than women. We're just different. Deal.

Re:"Men in Power" are Oppressors. (Score:1)
by Scott (scott@mensactivism.org) on Monday March 04, @02:15PM EST (#2)
(User #3 Info)
What's interesting is that the article cited a poll which found that men only disapproved of Swift's job barely more than women, and her disapproval rate was over 40% in each case.

I know many people in MA who can't stand her. She's had at least a couple of scandals so far, including one where she was caught having her child in day care at the taxpayers' expense. Swift sounds like bad news to me.

Scott
Re:"Men in Power" are Oppressors. (Score:1)
by crescentluna (evil_maiden@yahoo.com) on Monday March 04, @04:38PM EST (#8)
(User #665 Info)
Better than when she was demanding her staff babysat them instead of just putting them in daycare, or GASP, not trying to find cheapy ways to parent newborn twins while in the highest, and therefore most demandind position in state government. What a thought.
Re:"Men in Power" are Oppressors. (Score:2)
by Nightmist (nightmist@mensactivism.org) on Monday March 04, @02:44PM EST (#5)
(User #187 Info)
What sort of work has Governor Swift accomplished, besides being 'A Powerful Womyn'? Honestly. I have no problem with a woman in office. Perhaps she's simply not capable of doing the job required of her, hence the Republican's seeking to replace her.

Let's not forget this is the same woman who last week refused to pardon an imprisoned innocent man, apparently because it might hurt her election chances with the female voter.

Re:"Men in Power" are Oppressors. (Score:1)
by Attila on Monday March 04, @10:52PM EST (#10)
(User #685 Info)
Let's not forget this is the same woman who last week refused to pardon an imprisoned innocent man, apparently because it might hurt her election chances with the female voter.

What is further intimated in the article about her crying foul was that the Bush administration is proposing a government position for her should she drop from the race. Is there any possibility that this mensactivist dot org could organize a letter writing battalion to let the Bush Admin know what she has done to that innocent man??? And while we're there perhaps the same battalion could be enlisted to actively email or letter write for other campaigns? Just a thought.

Re: Letter campaign (Score:1)
by Tony (menrights@aol.com) on Monday March 04, @11:21PM EST (#11)
(User #363 Info)
good idea! I am all for a email campaign to protest her getting a job in government. I am not a fan of Bush but my respect level would raise if he did not give her a post and stated it was because of her stance on men's issues. (Imagine THE PRESIDENT mentioning men's issues!)
Tony H
Re: Letter campaign (Score:1)
by Luek on Tuesday March 05, @03:06AM EST (#12)
(User #358 Info)
"""(Imagine THE PRESIDENT mentioning men's issues!)"""

Nope ain't going to happen! Not with Bush.

But if you want to write Swift, here are some
addresses.

It may be more effective to contact her because she seems to be ultra sensitive at this moment to criticism. No doubt she will say this is the work of "powerful men" trying to do her in because she is a girl. Work on her paranoia!

State House
Office of the Governor
Room 360
Boston, MA 02133
(617) 727-6250
fax: (617) 727-9725
TTY: (617) 727-3666

Springfield Office
Office of the Governor
436 Dwight Street, 3rd floor
Springfield, MA 01103
(413) 784-1200
fax: (413) 784-1202

e-mail at:

GOffice@state.ma.us

Re: Letter campaign (Score:2)
by Nightmist (nightmist@mensactivism.org) on Tuesday March 05, @06:00AM EST (#13)
(User #187 Info)
It may be more effective to contact her because she seems to be ultra sensitive at this moment to criticism. No doubt she will say this is the work of "powerful men" trying to do her in because she is a girl. Work on her paranoia!

Thanks for the contact info, Luek. I'm going to be e-mailing the gov's office tomorrow morning.

Re: Letter campaign (Score:1)
by Attila on Tuesday March 05, @11:44AM EST (#15)
(User #685 Info)
That email address seems to be good. I fired one off to her the minute I read the article and it acknowledged receipt and didn't kick back...
Re:"Men in Power" are Oppressors. (Score:1)
by garypc on Tuesday March 05, @07:48AM EST (#14)
(User #608 Info)
I agree with the other posters.

I think it is a common theme that when presented with adversity at work or elswhere, women are far more likely to attribute that difficulty to gender discrimination.

Gary
Re:"Men in Power" are Oppressors. (Score:1)
by wiccid stepparent on Tuesday March 05, @02:00PM EST (#16)
(User #490 Info)
She's a Republican, right? Then probably not a radical feminist or "womyn" as you say. She's just using whatever rhetoric she thinks will keep her in the Governor's seat. Politicians are like that.
Re:"Men in Power" are Oppressors. (Score:2)
by Nightmist (nightmist@mensactivism.org) on Tuesday March 05, @02:30PM EST (#17)
(User #187 Info)
She's a Republican, right? Then probably not a radical feminist or "womyn" as you say. She's just using whatever rhetoric she thinks will keep her in the Governor's seat. Politicians are like that.

Yeah, radfems are generally on the liberal side, but she's trying to use radfem philosophy to her advantage. As for "womyn," teh feminists made up that word, not us. :)

Re:"Men in Power" are Oppressors. (Score:1)
by wiccid stepparent on Tuesday March 05, @02:42PM EST (#18)
(User #490 Info)
I know the basis of the word, but I still think it's stupid and not worth perpetuating.
Victimization Tripe - Whaaaa! (Score:1)
by warble (activistwarble@yahoo.com) on Monday March 04, @02:23PM EST (#3)
(User #643 Info)
Victimization Tripe

Figures. First this women chooses to keeps an innocent man in jail after he is proven innocent, and now she and her feminist support groups are whining about female victimization when there is a little male competition. Clearly, this is a cry for special rights and privileges on the part of females everywhere.

What is sad is that so many women are dumb enough to accept her cries of victimization, at the first sign of competition from a male, and they will actually vote for her! The next thing that these feminist will want is a weighted index that diminishes the power of the “evil white man's” vote.

If women want respect they will have to learn to oppose dictators like Gov. Swift when they keep innocent men locked up out of an irrational fear. Then they will have to learn to accept competition for their office from all angles. Gees. You would think this women is expecting the race for the Governor to be a team based cooperative effort void of all competition and opposition. Oh. But that is a characteristic of the “evil white man.” I forgot myself. Forgive me.

I know! What she can do is call 911 against her opponent and make a few false allegations. Then of course, because he is an evil man, he will be arrested and guilty until proven innocent. Then she can win the race without the competition from an “evil white man.”

Re:Victimization Tripe - Whaaaa! (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on Monday March 04, @02:40PM EST (#4)

Swift was not even VOTED into office, she ran as back up for Cellucci who left for greener pastures...

CJ


Re:Victimization Tripe - Whaaaa! (Score:1)
by warble (activistwarble@yahoo.com) on Monday March 04, @03:15PM EST (#6)
(User #643 Info)
Oh but that is the fault of the "evil white male."

Of course.....
Re:Victimization Tripe - Whaaaa! (Score:1)
by The Gonzo Kid (NibcpeteO@SyahPoo.AcomM) on Monday March 04, @05:48PM EST (#9)
(User #661 Info)
This is what happens with pheminists, though. When they can't cut it, find a man to blame it on. Better that then having to accept responibility for themselves.
---- Burn, Baby, Burn ----
Poor, poor Gov. Swift....Pppfff! (Score:2, Informative)
by Luek on Monday March 04, @03:38PM EST (#7)
(User #358 Info)
Besides keeping an innocent man in jail long after his female counterparts have been released, Governor (unelected) Swift is head of one of the most misandry driven family court systems in the nation if not the world!

If you are a divorced man without custody you might as well be living in Stalinist Russia of the 1930's.

check out the Massachusetts site:

http://www.fatherhoodcoalition.org/index.html
[an error occurred while processing this directive]