This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Wednesday January 23, @11:49AM EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
It is outrageous that this mandatory quota really does not enhance female athletes participation at all, yet young men's programs have delimited sport for 22,000 men.
It is a sick "lashing" out at men for the simple reason that on average more men will participate in more athletic programs than women, so the feminists decide to level the playing field by ruining opportunities for men.
At UNH, I was there when the men's teams got cut, it was very easy to do because UNH has more women than men. No one complained, yet at the same time the school had all sorts of pro-woman equality hype. Insane!!!
here is another link on this issue -
http://www.thewrestlingmall.com/htmls/title9&simpl ycommonsense.asp
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on Wednesday January 23, @11:56AM EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
"yet young men's programs have delimited sport for 22,000 men"
sorry for the 'typo'
it should read - yet programs have been eliminated for over 22,000 young men
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anon,
I'm interested in hearing more about how and when men's athletic programs were cut at UNH. Please e-mail me at scott@mensactivism.org when you get the chance.
Thanks,
Scott
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|