Washington Post: 'Fathers and Druthers'

Article here. Excerpt:

"So how was Father's Day for you? Did you get a new tie and a Sinatra record? Oh, you got a game for your Wii and the new Death Cab for Cutie? Cool. Pretty great to be treated like a king after a long week at the office, right? What, your wife's got the full-time job? No, it's your partner, Fred, who does? Still, family's first and it's a great day for . . . Your ex got full custody and you spent the day pretending it was any other Sunday? Sorry to bring up a sore subject. So remind me again: What exactly was it we were celebrating a couple of days ago?

Fatherhood isn't just challenging; it's changing. It's probably been changing ever since Adam had to confront his sons' challenging behavior, every generation doing it a little differently. But some ideas of what a father is have hung on pretty tenaciously: He's a provider; he's a role model. Here are some others: He's not big on expressing love; he's probably off working somewhere during the piano recital; he can barely boil water or wash his own clothes, so don't even think of leaving the kids alone with him."

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

Interesting that the article made it into a mainstream publication but it's difficult what to make of it. I've read it twice and I still can't tell if the guy is sympathetic or antagonistic to the mens/fathers movement.

I think he's curious, but his resistance and lack of clarity is one of the greatest challenges our movement faces. Many men, who are otherwise brave when standing up for themselves when facing off against OTHER MEN, are meek as church mice when it comes to asking for their rights within the family, or from women. It's unchivalrous! It just isn't done!

At some point guys like Mr. Trainer are going to have to realize that their self-abrogation and chivalry towards the women in their lives, of which they're so proud, is in fact cowardice and abandonment when seen from the point of view of their children.

Like0 Dislike0