RADAR ALERT: Tell Your Congressman – "Don't Earmark Money for Lawyers, Oppose HR6088"

vol·un·teer1 (noun): "a person who performs a service willingly and without pay"

Here's a riddle: When do volunteers get paid $55 million dollars?

Answer: When the "volunteers" are lawyers paid by Congress with your money.

Under the guise of combating domestic violence, House bill HR 6088, the misleadingly-named "National Domestic Violence Volunteer Attorney Network Act" would funnel your tax dollars to lawyers. It would be bad enough if the intent of this bill were merely Congressional pork for lawyers. But the intent of this bill is to place Congress' thumb firmly on the scales of justice to guarantee the conviction of the innocent along with the guilty.

Over and over again, researchers not bound by preconceived beliefs have concluded that domestic violence is a human problem, not a gender problem.2,3 If the recipient of the lion's share of the funding under HR 6088 were an organization that subscribed to honest research, the bill might have a legitimate premise. But the $55 million the bill authorizes is specifically allocated to:

  1. the ABA Commission on Domestic Violence,
  2. organizations that are to be created by the ABA Commission on Domestic Violence, or
  3. organizations that are required to collaborate with the ABA Commission on Domestic Violence.

One would expect the American Bar Association to respect basic concepts of American jurisprudence, like "innocent until proven guilty". But the ABA Commission on Domestic Violence (ABA-CODV) has demonstrated nothing but disdain for that most fundamental principle of American liberty. The overriding theme in their publication "10 Myths about Custody and Domestic Violence and How to Counter Them"4 is the presumption of guilt of the accused. The document is so larded with falsehoods that, of its 19 claims, only 2 are actually true.5,6

This week, please get in touch with your own Representative in the House. To locate the contact information, go to http://www.house.gov/, enter your zip code, and look up your Representative's name. Or you can call the Capitol Switchboard at 1-202-224-3121.

Please tell your Congressperson:

  • No earmarks for lawyers who believe in "guilty unless proven
    innocent"!
  • Oppose HR 6088.

---------------------------------------

Noted references are available on the RADAR web site by clicking their links.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Date of RADAR Release: June 16, 2008

Want to improve the chance that they'll pay attention to your letter? Click here.

R.A.D.A.R. – Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting – is a non-profit, non-partisan organization of men and women
working to improve the effectiveness of our nation's approach to solving domestic violence. http://www.mediaradar.org/.

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

The "justice department" and their cronies don't want to give up the empire that they built during the heyday of wellfare. Lawyers have reaped huge rewards due to the draconion laws that have been implemented, paid for mostly by either Men, or the taxpayers. Here we have a good example of media manipulation and unbridled greed. Yes, writing letters is a good idea. Initiating change is even a better idea. We need to quit letting lawyers pass laws that only benefit them, and not the People that they are supposed to serve, under oath I do believe.

David A. DeLong

Like0 Dislike0

the u.s. of the offended has more lawyers than the rest of the world combined.

and more in law school than we want to count. almost everyone in congress is a lawyer.
i'm betting most governors, state legislators and local politicians too.

obuma and his wife both lawyers. same w/ clintons.

what did we expect. got to put them to (and i use the word loosely) work. the work i see them do is transfer wealth from one person or group to another, and get a BIG cut. just look at all the new reasons people are finding to sue. daytime t.v. is eat up w/ commercials trying to convince people to sue one another, for imagined wrongs, or whatever. wonder what audience they are targeting just in the daytime like that? hmmmm? and going after the deep pockets. about as unethical a stunt as ever been invented.

kinda like one of those really sleasy used car lots. bring 'em in the front door, get their $$$, and then run 'em out the back. at least there you have a car to show for your $$$.

you might call it a "profession", i call it a scam.

Like0 Dislike0