Article: "Hillary's Racism & Misandry Won't Be Missed"

Hillary feigning attack by a black man? I didn't pick up on that. Maybe Obama did and won't pick her as a running mate. (If he does I'm not voting for him)
-ax

Be careful, Darryl James. She hasn't had the stake through the heart yet; she has just been beaten back into her cave for the time being.

So she may well be back. And if and when she does, she will still be hauling the same gigantic emotional baggage train of victimhood, grievance, misandry and deceit behind her. Except it will have a good many more nasty articles attached to it, accumulated during this acrimonious campaign where she has convinced herself that she has been cheated of her birthright and victimised by anyone and everyone who didn't fall down at her feet.

Beware a woman scorned...

Civilisation: man's greatest, and most unappreciated, gift to women

In addition to her weepy "poor whittle me" routine that Hillary mistakenly thought would bolster her "Commander-in-Chief, Ready from Day One!" fake persona, she also misjudged one more major factor with voters.

Americans are tired of the Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton oligarchy.

Two decades has been more than enough.

It is true that Hillary is "likeable enough," but she is not Presidential material just because she married Bubba.

Right now Obama is being extorted to throw her a bone because nobody in their right mind believes the Clintons are capable of anything other than acting in their own interests.

"Americans are tired of the Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton oligarchy."

So true.

And well said about her "poor whittle me" routine.

I can't stand that violent, dishonest hypocrite.

It's was clear to me that Hillary was using misandrist sexism and racism in her campaign. Until her "evil men" remark early in 2007 I wasn't sure of her sexist leanings. I'm glad someone else saw fit to publish the obvious facts.

Hillary extended the campaign long to enough to hobble Obama's chances so she can have another shot at the presidency in 2012. How can she now say she gives Obama her full support when she used such tactics to undermine him. If Obama is elected it would be much harder to mount a challenge against an incumbent president of the same party. Unfortunately, she'll be back.

Obama's former foreign policy adviser, Samantha Power, was correct in saying Hillary is a monster and would stoop to anything to get elected. Other than the gas tax holiday the only reasons Hillary and her surrogates gave to vote for her is that men are evil and anyone who doesn't vote for her hates women.

If Obama selects Hillary as his running mate I will definitely not vote for him either. McCain is a decent person and I wouldn't have a problem voting for him if Chillary is on the ticket.

I wonder where she got all this experience she talks about. Just being married to a president doesn't give her presidential experience. At the end of the year she will have been in the US Senate for 8 years. Obama will have had 4 years in the US Senate and 8 in the Illinois State Senate. Does she have that much more experience?

Thanks for listing the article here.

I would have to get over severe shock if Obama were to put Hillary on his ticket.

But there is no way I could ever vote for McLame, decent man or no.

It challenges me greatly to try to understand how a voter could switch from Obama to McCain and not require years of therapy after casting that ballot.

While you are voting for a particular man (and personality)for Presidential office, you are more importantly selecting a political philosophy, a policy agenda, and a worldview.

Changing your vote for President is not the equivalent of deciding you like Hannah Montana more than Brittany Spears.

It challenges me greatly to try to understand how a voter could switch from Obama to McCain and not require years of therapy after casting that ballot.

LOL! Guess I could have 4 or 8 years to regret it.

While you are voting for a particular man (and personality)for Presidential office, you are more importantly selecting a political philosophy, a policy agenda, and a worldview.

Yes, but McCain (and perhaps Chuck Hagel) is one of the moderate and least dislikable Republicans in federal government. If McCain is elected I'd hope he had more than token bipartisan cabinet nominations or the typical Republican agenda.

Anyway, I'll probably just vote for Obama. Obama should be smart enough to know that Hillary on the ticket is bad news in the general election.

Sometimes it's better to "balance the powers" by having opposite parties comprise the congress and the presidency respectively, to keep the country from quickly heading down the road to doom (which would be the result if either the moral majority bourgeiose or the PC fascists took complete control). The only caveat is that McCain would have veto power over essential legislation, and the Democratic majority in neither the House nor the Senate is great enough to override his vetoes in all important cases, like say if he vetoes an increase in minimum wage (at least not if a 2/3 majority is required to override, which I'm not sure is always the case).

If Obama picks Hitlary or probably any other woman as his running mate, I won't vote at all. Unless maybe if he picks Condoleeza Rice, but that doesn't seem likely ;-)

-ax

I really admire Chuck Hagel. I was hoping he would run for the White House.

I sent him an e-mail saying I would support him if he chose to run. (Mainly because he has been so on-target about the Iraq war.) I received a personal reply, and later a Christmas card, and I never sent him a dime.

He impressed me as one of the very few pols who can't be bought and sold. Obama should consider him for Veep.

Obama should consider [Hagel] for Veep.

It would help in attracting independent voters.