RADAR ALERT: Family Law Advocates Need to Counter DV Falsehoods

Department of Justice statistics show domestic violence (DV) in married, intact couples is only 2%. So why do the public and state legislators believe that partner violence is out of control?

Each year the federal government bankrolls the domestic violence industry to the tune of $1 billion. That money is authorized by the Violence Against Woman Act (VAWA) and other laws.

Much of that money is awarded to state domestic violence coalitions. In at least three cases – New Hampshire, Maine, and West Virginia – these coalitions have denied membership to organizations that proposed to provide domestic violence services to male victims of domestic violence in spite of Section 40002(b)(8) of VAWA 2005 which states, "Nothing in this title shall be construed to prohibit male victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking from receiving benefits and services under this title".

State DV coalitions often sponsor biased training programs to legislators, judges, and the public, falsely claiming that domestic violence is "overwhelmingly" perpetrated by men. (For examples, see RADAR’s Special Report, "Education for Injustice" (.pdf file)

In addition, state DV coalitions have become lobbying organizations. In many states they have successfully pressured legislators to weaken protective order standards and enact all-encompassing definitions of DV. They have also pushed state legislatures to adopt mandatory arrest polices, no-drop prosecution, and primary aggressor laws.

Federally-subsidized state DV advocates have used the domestic violence issue to defeat family law reforms, as well:

  • North Dakota’s shared parenting initiative in 2006
  • West Virginia’s shared parenting bill in 2008
  • New Hampshire’s mutual consent divorce bill in 2008
  • Virginia’s bill that would have required evidence and a separate
    finding to restrict a parent’s access to a child in a spousal protective order in 2008

2008 did see one successful attempt to restore fairness and balance to family law. A West Virginia bill was proposed to impose criminal penalties for false accusations of DV and child abuse. The West Virginia bill was recently signed into law, albeit somewhat watered-down from the original version.

It has become clear that family law reform will not succeed until the half-truths and falsehoods of intimate partner violence are addressed.

We encourage persons concerned about family law reform to work together to assure the truth of domestic violence gets out. RADAR has developed a flyer, "It’s Time to Tell the Truth about Domestic Violence"(.pdf file). We encourage persons to share this information with legislators and others in your state, so family law reform becomes a reality.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Date of RADAR Release: April 14, 2008

Want to improve the chance that they'll pay attention to your letter? Click here.

R.A.D.A.R. – Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting – is a non-profit, non-partisan organization of men and women working to improve the effectiveness of our nation's approach to solving domestic violence. http://www.mediaradar.org/.

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

"Nothing in this title shall be construed to prohibit male victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking from receiving benefits and services under this title".

Look. This was a clever legal dodge from the beginning to allow legislators who 100% unanimously voted for VAWA to CLAIM that they supported services for male victims of DV.

Any idiot can see it was a scam from the get-go.

There was nothing MANDATED in the reauthorization for men.

So, in legal terms -- kiss my butt!

There is no intention of gender equity in VAWA.

It is just a business. A franchise of feminist parasites in every city.

Cops and judges get paid to attend feminist workshops based on the Duluth Model and learn how to further criminalize males.

"Ignoring her needs" will soon be a felony offense.

Like0 Dislike0

The prominent data on the DOJ/BJS web site are statistically meaningless. The web site states that ...

22% of nonfatal violent victimizations against females are due to intimate violence
4% of nonfatal violent victimizations against males are due to intimate violence

It also states that ...

Intimate partners committed 30% of homicides of females
Intimate partners committed 5% of homicides of males

This makes it sound as if things are pretty bad for women - that they are much more likely to be victims of domestic violence.

But consider the homicide numbers. By themselves, they do not tell us if men or women are more likely to be victims of DV murder. Because 30 is a bigger number than 5 doesn't necessarily mean that 30% of one thing is bigger than 5% of something else. For example, what would you rather have? 5% of Bill Gates net worth or 30% of the average person's net worth?

Men are about 4 times more likely than women to be victims of all homicides. This means that 5% of male murders is not all that different than 30% of female murders. In fact, these numbers suggest that men are the victims in about 40% of DV homicides, with women being the victims in 60%.

Why do you think that this Department of Justice web site uses the 30/5 ratio (which is meaningless) instead of a 60/40 ratio (which is meaningful)? Clearly, their agenda is to do everything they can to propagate the incorrect myth that women are victims of men. 30/5 sounds a lot worse than 60/40. Those poor women. Those evil men.

Feel free to provide your comments to the DOJ/BJS at askbjs@usdoj.gov

Like0 Dislike0

It didn't take me long before I realized these "statistics" were skewed to make men look evil.

It's no secret that IPV is equally likely regardless of gender. They're not fooling anybody.

Evan AKA X-TRNL
Real Men Don't Take Abuse!

Like0 Dislike0