Child protection? No, ruination

"Two men are incarcerated by the State, when they should be the stability in two children's lives."

This excellent article discusses two recent notorious cases in the UK. Excerpt:

'The system is merciless to people who question the system. Charles Roy Taylor, whom I wrote about at Christmas, is in a similar situation. Mr Taylor is a 71-year-old with a heart condition. He was sent to prison for 20 months for being in contact with his stepgrandson, who has been in care since his mother died and who has repeatedly run away to see his grandparents. By breaching an agreement not to answer the door to him, Mr Taylor stands accused of “undermining the care plan”. But he and the boy's grandmother are the teenager's only living relatives. They will presumably be his first port of call when he comes of age and is thrown out of the care system. Mr Taylor may not survive that long: last week he suffered an angina attack that put him in hospital for four days. Is that in the interests of the boy?'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

This manipulative article is not defending men at all. Its sole intention is to defend bad mothers, who at last are beginning to bear responsibility before society for their bad treatment of children. The next step in improving the children's destiny will be introduction of the Artificial Womb.

----------------------------------------------------
Single men is the only social group benefited from feminism.

Like0 Dislike0

You're really looking forward to that Artificial Womb, aren't you, nbdspcl? Well, truth be told, so am I. It would be nice to be able to have children without risking a woman making your life a living hell.

I disagree about the article, though. Clearly, the author is genuinely concerned for the way the two men have been treated, and upset with the way the social services system in the UK handled the situation. Proof of this is the way she chastizes the system.

Evan AKA X-TRNL
Real Men Don't Take Abuse!

Like0 Dislike0