Beware of the office piranha: Male bosses warned of man-eating women who are preying on them

I'll post it on the media section of my site and copy the story for discussion, if you guys don't mind me borrowing it.

As far as the actual article. Here are some of the disturbing pro-female arguments being made:

1. "Poor,poor men... they can't keep it in their pants and it's still women's fault! (yawn)"

- Louis Smythe-Silva, Sintra

2. "What a cynical and sexist view to take. It couldn't possibly be that sometimes people are just attracted to each other, could it?"

- Victoria, Essex

3. "I wonder if the same thing applies for those female bosses and their workers! ;)"

- Smileyrose, UK

4. "The question has to be asked, what is wrong with these men? Are they incapable of turning these women down or are they completely powerless to a femme fatale?"

- Annie Mayo,

5. "If senior management lead by example then their behaviour will never place them in these situations. However, it has been my personal experience that these men themselves prey on young and pretty girls at alcohol fuelled office parties so, in my opinion, you reap what you sow! Behave with dignity and you'll be fine."

- Brenda, Melle, France

6. "And what about the stupid men who (despite being married) end up being flattered into bed. Of course it's never their fault, their brains are in their pants."

- Richa Buckley, Bushey, England

----------
The domain of Mr. Reality

The Women are at Fault by Matthias Matussek

The lubrication for this mode of female predation is revealed in divorce attorney Ms. Benussi's quote re: --

"The courts are increasingly willing to make financial awards which enable a mother to bring up a child in circumstances which reflect the father's resources and way of life."

This cannot be explained away as anything other than state-sanctioned prostitution cum extortion, whereby a female rents her vagina to a wealthy (or merely ordinary)targeted male fool, and then uses all the chicanery of the feminist legal system to harvest his assets.

If we can have a law like IMBRA directed at eliminating sex slavery for women, why are the feminists not screaming for a parallel bill that would outlaw the harvesting of men as sex-wallets?

It is a funny (perhaps stupid?) kind of patriarchal oppressor that allows the objects of his oppression to steal his property and liberty.

Unless of course, no such Patriarchy actually exists...

And BTW, what's really intriguing about this article is the implied feminist economic theory behind it.

Because, in essence, it suggests that the value of pussy is whatever chivalry and the family courts will approve.

And if the past four thousand years are any indication, the pussy market index has been consistently inflationary, beyond anything you'd see even in Brazil or Zimbabwe today.

You can always more or less know what a dollar is worth, because its value is linked to financial metrics that lend some small degree of rationality to the system.

But the actual cost of pussy?

It's impossible to know, and always favors the owner (or broker) of the vagina.

Forget about Ron Paul's silly idea of returning the American economy to the Gold Standard.

We need to convert to the Pussy Standard.

The slogan on the new p-dollar -- the vaginero -- would say: "Put your money where your mouth is."

I was not fully aware that Ron Paul wants to go back to the Bretton Woods Standard.

The reason Nixon took us off the B.W. Standard in the 70s was due to about $22 billion dollars of our assets being pumped overseas.

The system we have now seems to have an even deeper flaw though. I will not get into detail on that however.

Is Mr. Paul a supporter of this proposed system?:

Bretton Woods II?

A number of economists (e.g. Doole, Folkerts-Landau and Garber) have referred to the system of currency relations which evolved after 2001, in which currencies, particularly the Chinese renminbi (yuan), remained fixed to the US Dollar as Bretton Woods II. The argument is that a system of pegged currencies is both stable and desirable, a notion that causes considerable controversy.

"Bretton Woods II", unlike its predecessor, is not codified and does not represent any kind of a multilateral agreement. It contains the following key elements.

The United States imports considerable amounts of goods, particularly from East Asian export-oriented economies such as China and Japan, year after year.
Since China and Japan don't have much demand for U.S.-produced goods, United States runs large trade deficits with both countries.

Under normal circumstances, trade deficits would correct themselves through depreciation of the dollar and appreciation of the yen and the renminbi. However, Chinese and Japanese governments are interested in keeping their currencies low with respect to the dollar to keep their products competitive. To achieve that, they are forced to buy large quantities of U.S. treasury securities with freshly-printed money.
Similar mechanisms work in the Eurozone with the euro and its satellite currencies (British pound and Swiss franc). The Eurozone is somewhat less coupled to the U.S. economy, so the euro has been allowed to appreciate considerably with respect to the dollar.

----------
The domain of Mr. Reality

The Women are at Fault by Matthias Matussek