"Democratic Debate Proves You Can Hit a Girl"

Article here. Excerpt:

'Thanks primarily to former Senator John Edwards, Tuesday night's Democratic debate was different. He was out to prove it's OK to hit a girl. He hit Clinton so many times that as the night wore on, she began to seem punch drunk, unsure of what was on or off the table and which tough issues needed yet another study by a fuzzy bipartisan commission tied up with a blue ribbon.
...
Rick Lazio of New York, who entered the 2000 Senate race after Rudy Giuliani got out after announcing he had prostate cancer and that he was separating from his second wife.

When Lazio decided to get aggressive by walking across the stage at a debate to wave a piece of paper practically under Clinton's nose, it backfired. The only thing worse than being too soft is being too hard if your opponent is a woman.'

---

Relatedly, Obama chides Clinton for playing gender card and The pants vs. the pantsuit.

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

She is going to play the gender card to divert the fact that she does not want to answer the questions on the issues being asked. If she lets on as to what she really is all about the American people will run away from her as fast as possible. She has communist and femnazi ideas. So instead of letting her true ideas be shown, she plays the "boohoo I am the weaker sex" card. I just hope that after this, people see that if she can't take it when a few candidates puts her under pressure, can she handle it when she is under pressure from the world?

www.move-off.org
patriotsofamerica@move-off.org

Like0 Dislike0

The best thing about the escalating election debates is going to be watching how Hillary tries to balance her "I'm tough enough to take on any man" with her "I'm still a girl and you shouldn't beat up on me" conflicted (simulated) personalities.

It is guaranteed to be a comic book in feminist illogic.

Will America buy it?

And more importantly, is Osama laughing his ass off?

Like0 Dislike0

There's No Excuse
For Democrat Violence :-)

Like0 Dislike0

...especially when the feminization of America has fooled the world into switching from logic to irrational emotion.

Everything is decided on how people feel at the moment now, not on logical conclusions. Women and the men that pander to them made sure that their overly emotional dysfunctional tirades and narcisisstic obsessions would not only be accepted but glorified by society. This is why anyone that tells the truth about how women are is labelled a "misogynist" or some other such misandric shaming tactic will be utilized.

Another popular term used by women is "hater." If you don't agree with what they like "you're a hater"(If you're logical and not pandering to women you're a "hater" or "misogynist." Get it?), such is the reality of just how low America has fallen under the guidance of the matriarchy which has ruled western civilization from the shadows for hundreds of years.

----------

The Women are at Fault by Matthias Matussek

Like0 Dislike0