Men: Guilty until proven innocent

The loss of that little motherfucker has him all emotional and fired up against men because his son was taken by a man "supposedly." Therefore anything John Walsh says must be viewed with suspicion as much of it WILL BE anti-male.

He's angry, scared and wants revenge on the society that allowed his spoiled kid to get snatched up. Fuck a John Walsh and anyone else that villifies men while excluding women -- the main force behind misandry staying alive -- from any blame(*cough*...OpEd...*cough*).

"the most outrageous aspect is the total and i mean TOTAL silence from women. hell, they could care less. makes me sick." ~ donnieboy5

"Feminism: The most organized form of nagging" ~ Peter Zohrab

*E-Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/No_Feminazis

John Walsh's Saturday night show has nearly turned into a show about wanted suspect Sex Offenders. In the 80's and 90's, it was mainly about murderers or prison escapees. I just wonder how far this obsession we have with pounding those conficted of any crime related to sex will go. A guy in Nebraska was just sent to prison for 6 years for possessing child pornography. Isn't that a bit long for someone who is only viewing and not producing? Oh, I forgot, they are the same now.

While we still all know that he is angry and wants to blame a man. When in fact no one until this day can prove who it was. Man, Woman, Murder, business partner, someone he owed money to for the 26 million dollar hotel. The James guy that his wife was having an affair with. But most important what about Reve?? Did anyone ever see her as a witness that Adam was even at the mall with him?? His outrage on men is for only one thing and that is FOX AND MONEY!!! PERIOD. They have found a new way to make a hit at children and families expense. When in fact they need to be looking at the families and women that are committing 40% while father's 18%.

John Walsh and Mark Lunsford as well as many others are just a bunch of liars.

See blog that has latest update on him and Lunsford as well as Foley. Strange they are all from Florida? We would tell everyone that anyone that supported his AWA Law and Jessica's LAW gather your friends and relatives and it could be a 4 million VOTE count to not vote for these people.

http://johnwalshournewgod.blogspot.com/

God Bless Men and their Children

You really have to hand it to the radical feminists, all 3% of them as a percentage of the American female population.

(Kim Gandy at N.O.W. brags about 500,000 members and refuses to verify this as an actual, honest figure. That's .03% of the female population of the U.S.)

But the actual stats of feminist domination don't matter, because they have won the propaganda media war. (Well, give the men's movement $1 billion a year of taxpayer's money and watch how fast feminist hegemony disappears!)

Worse than the fact that males cannot be childcare providers for fear of a false allegation, men can no longer teach in the K-12 system.

Last time I checked, teachers in elementary and secondary education were 85% female.

The majority of male K-12 educators started out as coaches and then go into administration, where they can hide in their offices and never be in contact with an actual student.

Funny how we're supposed to "support our troops."

The very same young men who were driven out of the educational system by the rancid feminism that taught them very early on that they were disposable.

And, they are.

That is, she almost ruins it from an MRA standpoint (not that I think she is trying to impress us as an MRA).

Here's the dandy:

"Refusing to hire male baby sitters is not the equivalent of saying all men are sexual abuse predators. It's about minimizing risk."

It seems she basically agrees with Walsh, or at least espouses the same "philosophy" that he does. But no-one with half a brain is saying the two are "equivalent", that is not the point. The article writer seems confused here, like maybe she is silently conversing with herself while writing, and has innter turmoil about whether she would ever hire a male babysitter herself (assuming for the moment that she has children).

The bottom line question is this: "Which creates a greater drag on society..the possible molestation of a few more kids per year, or the vast majority of kids learning not to trust men; not to mention all the other ailments brought on by casting one group of society as evil?

I also commend her for using the phrase "male profiling". That is what is actually going on out there, as I had mentioned in an earlier post.

-ax

Witch-hunts can be big business, especially for the media..who seem to be capitalizing on the current public hysteria over this issue. It cannot be just coincidence that Walsh is largely focusing on child cases of late; nor can it all be attributed to his own personal bias either. After all, FOX is in business to make money.

"If the popular media and the press were, or had ever been, anything but unethical parasitic morons, we would live in a vastly different and happier society."
--Anonymous

-ax

The REAL concern should not about risk of sexual molestation in the first place, that's a distraction.

The real fight is to get people to acknowledge that regardless of gender, there are risks to leaving your kids with ANYONE. HOWEVER - and here's the real important part that MRAs need to get hammered home - males on average are 100% as capable and competent at caring for children as females on average. There are exceptionally good examples and exceptionally bad examples of child care to be found in BOTH genders. The RISKS are equal no matter which gender you pick. The question is not one of gender but one of ability.

Just as females can be workaholic CEOs of fortune 500 companies like Pepsico (the 3rd most powerful woman on Earth according to Forbes) men are completely capable of child caring roles and taking care of a home.

We need to get the gender factor OUT of this debate. Just like feminists got the gender factor out of the women in the boardroom debate.

Every time we allow it to be framed in terms of women are good, men are molesters we lose automatically. We need to fight that issue and it's a HUGE one.

It appears to me that the chief issue, at least as far as Walsh is concerned, is to prevent molestation. And since he thinks that the majority of molesters are men, the net result is that men are being unfairly stereotyped..and THAT should be the main issue for MRA's; raising awareness of female molesters, though important, is only tangentially related.

-ax

He blames everyone else on the whole fucking planet for his wife leaving his young son alone in Sears while she went off shopping.

He's a moron. His opinion does not even register with me because his bias so so clear and infects him down to his core.

The real issue is not one of gender, it is one of getting pieces of garbage like Walsh out of the publics ear so that we can start to work on the idea that men are EQUALLY capable - if not necessarily the same in their practices - of caring for children.

"his wife [left their] young son alone in Sears while she went off shopping"

Needless to say, if the roles were reversed, the mother would have immediately divorced Walsh, and he would be in jail for "child neglect" or whatever. Then she would have HER own show, but it would be much more along tear-jerker lines..or she would be going around the country to speak, on Oprah, etc. Also if it had been a daughter instead of a son, we would have "[Daughter's name]'s Law", designed to penalize men who leave their children alone in public.

On a personal note, I think one thing Walsh may have overlooked is that he will never get over the loss of his child, as long as he is doing this show.

-ax

... My mom worked for Sears at the time. Mrs Walsh left her young son in the toy department to play a brand new thing called a video game with a bunch of teenagers (as if that alone was a smart idea) and the teenagers group of kids got rowdy after about 15 minutes, and security kicked their asses out of the store completely along with little Adam. Adam was abducted from the parking lot while trying to find his moms car. Mom went back to the toy department some time later to find Adam missing and we all know the rest accept for the fact that the case still technically remains unsolved despite false confessions from inmates over the years.

Granted, the security guard never should have kicked Adam out into the parking lot but Sears and every other retailer in North America and most of the world quickly changed their policies that kids are to be taken only to the security office and parents paged and adopted 'code Adam' for when a kid goes missing from an absent minded parents sight which is still standard practice today. So the retail industry reacted and took appropriate steps and policies to ensure that never happens again.

Didn't stop psychopath John Walsh from going on an unholy crusade for the last few decades though attempting to blame everyone else and solve a problem that was fixed before his crusade even began.

Funny thing is that AWA could have been in place back then and Adam would still have been abducted. His law is a reflection of his fathers anger and attempt to punish everyone for what happened and nothing more, as it would have done ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to save Adam from the awful fate that befell him.

I would first like to say that Walsh says on an interview that his wife was 3 aisle's away? So why did Adam not hollow for his mother to help him? Then we have the fact that she was having an affair which John says he did not know? I agree that no responsible parent will leave a child to roam around the store. She is at fault period and did in fact neglect the child.

For years now Walsh and Fox have been all about catching murderers etc. Now that Fox was losing rating on that part because in 20 years his show only help catch 900+ people that equates to 1/2 person a year. The fact that he nor has anyone ever proved it was a man that Killed poor Adam or a woman. Walsh and Fox have now found a new Venue to get big bucks by "EXPLOTING HIS OWN SONS DEATH". Part of the blog I will post here to show his hate for men. Read careful what he says on the White house grounds to reporters.

I really think this bill today is going to send a loud message. It only deals with convicted sex offenders, only the level one, the most violent ones, but it sends a message "You messed up one time, you hurt a woman, you hurt a child, but we have the right now to punish you. We have the right to know where you are. We have the right for that soccer mom to check a Web site and know if there's a convicted serious sex offender in their neighborhood." I think today's going to be a loud voice for a lot of victims that will be in the Rose Garden with my wife and I.

NOTICE THE PART YOU HURT A WOMAN OR YOU HURT A CHILD? WELL I GUESS THAT SAYS IT ALL! ALWAYS RUNNING OFF AT THE MOUTH WITHOUT ANY DATA TO BACK IT UP. MEN ARE GUILTY IN HIS EYES PERIOD. SOMETHING IS WRONG WITH THIS CRAZY MAN.

He says nothing about women period. When in fact look at the Indiana woman that killed her 4 children and was sentence life this week. The point I am making here is that Walsh is out after men period. I think it deep inside of him because of Reve cheating on him. Or maybe it's because he has and or had an Sex addiction for women as he admitted on Larry King CNN. What we know for sure is that it is all about money period. If you look at NCMEC which he and Reve co-founded no where on their site does it show anything about a % of men hurting a child. Nor does it show the Department of HSS study 2005 that 40.4 % that women kill or abuse a child, compared to 18.3% men.

Then we have Mark Lunsford and his my space page subjecting our children to drugs,sex,weapons and booze. While he runs around saying tougher laws. It will shock you what you will see on the blog, pictures of him and his friend list. However there are so many pictures and dates when he log in and added these friends.

Take a look at his sinful BS and then his own son gets off with a Sex Crime charge in Ohio him being 18 and the girl 14.

Follow the money folks and see where it goes.

Look at the blog and see the corruption and pictures on there. These are facts and not made up.

http://johnwalshournewgod.blogspot.com/

pardon me.-ax