Syndicate
Special Thanks To...
The following organizations were early supporters of Mensactivism.org, and we thank them for their support. If you'd like to trade links with us, see our Mensactivism.org supporters page.
Circumcision: Uncovering the truth about women's pleasure
Submitted by anthony on Sat, 2007-07-21 16:17
Article here.
This is an interesting article. MGM as it relates to female sexuality. No mention of the psychological or physical impact it has on the man. No mention of common deformities related to circumcision. When it has an affect on the female, it becomes an issue. In this case, an entire book was written on the subject. Excerpt:
"For her book, O'Hara surveyed 139 women, drawn through classified ads in various publications. By a margin of 9 to 1, she says, they preferred the natural penis over his maligned, circumcised cousin. When the man is cut, O'Hara found, women are "almost five times less likely to achieve vaginal orgasm."
- Log in to post comments
Comments
I don't give a fuck what kind of penis some woman likes..
If they don't like my penis the way it is..if it does not "give them enough pleasure"..tough shit, I fuck for my own pleasure.
This whole thing, the book etc, is the ultimate objectification of men. Imagine the reaction if they talked about what kind of breasts men prefer to suck.
-ax
Well...
To get anything solved in this society, you need to have an answer to the most important question of all: "what's in it for women?" Looking at the way anything gets done, the fact that women get less pleasure with circumsized penises should be enough to ban it. We MUST THINK OF THE WOMEN, PEOPLE!
All sarcasm aside, I hope the practice gets banned. If this is the main reason, then that will unmask some of the hypocrisies with the way things get done around here. Two birds with one stone.
Flaccid Research
The article concludes with this observation -- "Most women, unfortunately, do not pay a lot of attention to a man's penis..."
Well, when her primary focus is the size of a man's wallet, that's understandable. And for the majority of women, bigger IS better.
M-o-n-e-y remains the preferred aphrodisiac for the typical American female....
Meaning??
Maybe I should have read the entire article before commenting here... but I just have a couple of questions, based on the capsule description and excerpt from the article:
1) If most women do not pay attention to a man's penis, that is probably because they can't normally see it (due to the man wearing something called "pants")..unless they are in the process of getting laid, in which case I don't think they _can_ ignore it.
2) If women don't pay attention to a man's penis, why the fuck did someone write this article, which is written from the standpoint of women, in the first place??
Just a couple of elementary questions, sorry if I sound naive:)
-ax
Why would a woman need to pay attention to a penis during sex?
If she believes in the feminist mantra that women do not like giving head, and the penis is nothing but a disgusting thing anyway, she needs not even look at it during sex. It merely disappears within her, she gets off and reaches climax several times, then feels violated over the whole ordeal later.
I think what the author means, is that women don't really pay attention - lack focus - to any one thing during sex. Unlike men who are highly visual and do pay attention to their partners body, women can come if a song they like is playing during sex or if the right scent of candle is lit. It's just different erotic triggers.
To answer the other question, the article is written from a female point of view because everything in Western culture must be from a female point of view.
This reminds me of a joke a friend told me.
Question: Why do women claim they fake every orgasm?
Answer: Because they are dumb enough to think men care(whether they climaxed or not).
*E-Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/No_Feminazis/
*Site and Blog: http://www.freewebs.com/nofeminazis/index.htm
*"the most outrageous aspect is the total and i mean TOTAL silence from women. hell, they could care less. makes me sick." ~ donnieboy5
Hey Roy..
I wasn't responding to anything _you_ wrote in my "Meaning?" comment. I just realized it might look that way to you.
Does anyone know where RandomMan is lately? I would think he'd be the last one to cop out on us, and start associating with an entitlement princess. I do suspect we have lost some guys that way, like maybe Thundercloud.
They'll be back.
-ax
I think he got turned off by the new verification system
RandomMans last post said he was still reading but not posting until the bugs get fixed in the image verification system that is used on this site as occasionally you need to enter the image verification code a dozen or so times before it is accepted.
But it could be any number of reasons. I enjoyed his insights as well and also hope he returns to the discussions here at some point.
Sorry for the off topic post, just answering Ax's question. I am not trying to steer the thread off course in any way.
Men tend to drop-off once a woman gets involved.
Women hate equality with a vengeance. It's all about what they get and the hell with other people's rights. Thus any MRA that starts screwing with one of these harpies will soon stop being a man and adopt his status amongst women as a doormat.
*E-Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/No_Feminazis/
*Site and Blog: http://www.freewebs.com/nofeminazis/index.htm
*"the most outrageous aspect is the total and i mean TOTAL silence from women. hell, they could care less. makes me sick." ~ donnieboy5
That's not true
I have been dating the same girl for about a year now, and I am still fully committed to the cause of men's rights. She's not interested - cause as you said, there's really nothing in it for her - but I couldn't care less how she feels about it. If she gets to annoying then I'm done with her since I refuse patently to allow her to move in with me and we share absolutely no mutual belongings or financial ties (I don't even pay for her when we go out - ever).