"Boys Should Be Girls" by Dick Meyer

He needs to grow some balls and some hair.

His intelligience is receding along with his hairline.

Women have been living off of men for hundreds of years being "couch potatoes." So now that men are being discriminated against this bald ass motherfucker is going to go and claim men need to get up and go as if widespread misandry does not exist? Motherfucker the reason women are now "graduating more than men" is because men broke their backs to put women first; like always. Men always took a stand for women anytime they fucking needed something. Fuck that.....WE put women on the map with technology, support, and the laws we instituted.

When young men get somewhere in life they make sure to thank their mothers even if their moms were fucking losers like most women. How many women do you see praising their fathers? Very few. Women don't take a stand for men. They take the privileges chivalrous men give them and when they succeed--via affirmative action--they flip the bird at the men who got their shady asses there.

This fool needs to worry more about why he is trying to hold onto his last bit of hair(motherfucker shave that shit already it is NOT coming back!) as opposed to trying to bash his own gender.

Fucking losers and pansies men have become today....I swear.

*E-Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/No_Feminazis/
*Site and Blog: http://www.freewebs.com/nofeminazis/index.htm

*"the most outrageous aspect is the total and i mean TOTAL silence from women. hell, they could care less. makes me sick." ~ donnieboy5

He quotes the wage stats without explaining/knowing that they don’t take into account position held, specialized education or overtime worked, feminist have been implying that the wage gap is the result of discrimination for decades by ignoring these variables, this has demonized men, and that is very apparent in this asshole. His argument seems to be “men deserve to have their status ignored” he presents this hateful outlook without knowing facts, he’s just spewing the feminist propaganda he’s never even bothered to research.

“I don't have statistics on this”

No shit, this man follows his bias not his brain…and he’s proud of it? He also edits your news.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/10/18/utility/main951739.shtml

Mr. Reality -- "f#ck:nG" losers and pansies men have become today....I swear."

Yes you do ... swear a lot(in this post).

I think you managed to use the f-word as a noun, a verb, an adjective, an adverb, maybe even a gerund.

And to think that OpEd crucified me for calling fully qualified women "skanks!"

Maybe s/he will donate a rhetorical bar of soap to sanitize your potty mouth?

One point you made, a simple Hemingway-like interrogative was - "How many women do you see praising their fathers? Very few."

Here's my spin on this valid observation:

With a 50% divorce rate in America, you can bet that there is a lot of psychological warfare and parental alienation going on pre-divorce.

The P.A. syndrome has been identified as something (usually) ex-wives do, using the kids as a weapon for vengence.

My theory is that this vicious exploitation of children begins DURING the marriage, as a typical female passive-aggressive tactic to destroy the father's connection to his children.

Female children are especially vulnerable to their mother's psychotic manipulations.

Mr. Reality, if you would just clean up your grammar, Joe Biden might invite you to testify at the next VAWA reauthorization hearing.

What you posted here cannot be included in the official Judiciary Committee's transcripts....

It says something like "One shouldn't draw conclusions about others from oneself".
If Mr. Meyer was the typical male, I would indeed consider him to be right...

..nothing this bald ass clown says is based on facts. Everything is his opinion.

*E-Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/No_Feminazis/
*Site and Blog: http://www.freewebs.com/nofeminazis/index.htm

*"the most outrageous aspect is the total and i mean TOTAL silence from women. hell, they could care less. makes me sick." ~ donnieboy5

mike savell

I can only say that,if he thinks things are ok then he has no worries and we don't need to hear from him again.I hope he won't complain too much if he loses his job to someone who will take a smaller wage,we shall see.
I think boys should be taught by their own sex and we
therefore need more male teachers.At present this is not going to happen and mras have to continue to fight for the circumstances in which male teachers won't feel saddled with the ridiculous premise that they are all sex perverts.
I also strongly feel that boys should be taught PURE
LOGIC.This would help them out more than anything else.Surely someone would second this and have some
practical ideas.It doesn't need to be in a school syllabus.

...as opposed to women who delve more into how she "feels" about something. Of course more men are becoming illogical nowadays since they were raised by women who teach--and shame--them into listening to, or following, their feelings as opposed to dealing with facts. The good thing is men are starting to rebel and become more and more logical once again...because they recognize the tyranny that was heaped upon them by the single mother industry. With women feelings trumps facts, which is why we have so many junk science studies that back-up bullshit today. They don't care about facts....it is about what they want. It's emotion not logic.

That's what PC bullshit does, it protects the "feelings" of the privileged classes. In this case homosexuals, women, and black WOMEN; black men are demonized in America. Look at how we are portrayed in the media usually.

If a fact is presented harshly where it hurst someone feelings or they feel "oppressed" because of it the fact gets censored or a group of activists that represent the privileged classes launch a shaming assault until the facts are forgotten or lost in the mire of shaming tactics. The homosexual activist utilized a form of deception known as "jamming" to fool the masses into being obssessed with homosexual activities and such. This paved the way for the move towards an androgynous society which is still in the works today.

*E-Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/No_Feminazis/
*Site and Blog: http://www.freewebs.com/nofeminazis/index.htm

*"the most outrageous aspect is the total and i mean TOTAL silence from women. hell, they could care less. makes me sick." ~ donnieboy5

What I really want to know is the ratio of grants and scholarships available to women vs men? Anyone know where to even start looking for this info?

Warren Farrell in his book "Women Can't Hear What Men Don't Say" talks about government funded or subsidized programs for girls and women only -- scholarships and grants, programs in academia for female teachers, programs that encourage girls and women to go into science and engineering fields, etc.

Thanks!

"Women Can't Hear What Men Don't Say" - pp 231, 234.

"The War Against Boys" by Hoff-Sommers - gender-equity training of teachers: pp. 35, 41, 60-61; male teachers: p. 174.

"Legalizing Misandry" by Nathanson and Young has a lot of info on "Women's Studies" departments in academia.

-ax

Nice post