He Who Fathers Least, Fathers Best

Submitted by anthony on Sun, 2007-06-17 17:58

Here's some more misandry on Father's Day. When you read the article notice how Hitler's name comes up. Excerpt:

"There is now much evidence that the role of the father, even his absence, is just as important in shaping presidents as is the role of the mother. Affirmed and empowered by their mother's love but also hurt and frustrated by their father's absence, a leader, including most American presidents, will strive to prove their value and worth with their great achievements."

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

So based on this observation, in order to produce high-achieving men, you should yourself be a real high-achiever who is M.I.A. from your sons' lives.

The author acts like there are two major options for paternal behavior: absent high-achiever and obsequious houseboy in service to the kids. I daresay there are other options for both fathers and their sons. Must all men be high-achievers? More of the same you-are-what-you-do horsecow that men get splattered with everywhere else.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by mcc99 on Mon, 2007-06-18 00:32

...women.

*E-Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/No_Feminazis/
*Site and Blog: http://www.freewebs.com/nofeminazis/index.htm
*"the most outrageous aspect is the total and i mean TOTAL silence from women. hell, they could care less. makes me sick." ~ donnieboy57

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by MrReality on Mon, 2007-06-18 00:59

...so ridiculous until it is not even worth disputing.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by 032105 on Mon, 2007-06-18 20:41

Once again, a women claims that the fact that men achieve highly, is due to the influence of the mother..as if it is due to some pathological reaction that the boy has to his upbringing by his mother, like Camille Paglia claims.

I myself think it is pretty obvious, that since women do not have anywhere near the level of achievement, historically, that men do (e.g. most great philosophers, scientists, etc are men), that women in general feel less important as a class because of this fact, and therefore try to reduce the whole thing to some pathological reaction that the man has regarding his upbringing by the mother (and of course in all these scenarios, the mother herself is not the problem, i.e. she has done nothing wrong. It is all due to the man's/boy's pathology, his "reaction").

Regarding this, women are also at a stage right now where they are "frozen" in place, still focusing on complaining, "becoming empowered", and investing tremendous amounts of energy in fighting illusory barriers..whereas in fact they _have been_ empowered for at least a couple decades, and so need to go ahead and achieve, i.e. _do_ the things they have been empowered to do. One female achiever, assuming she has personal integrity, speaks louder than a thousand whining feminists.

-ax

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by axolotl on Wed, 2007-06-20 00:04

...which they built. Any improvements women have gained were on the backs of the male and the techonoly which we developed not feminism which is nothing but political nagging. Feminism achieved nothing but causing men to begin to wake out of their dream-like state and see how malicious women truly are. Just like the moronic arguments women bring up in relationships; none of it makes any sense and they bring misery on themselves.

Women call me a misogynist because I love pointing out how fucking stupid the points they try to make are. Hell if the shoes fits I'll wear that bitch.

*E-Group: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/No_Feminazis/
*Site and Blog: http://www.freewebs.com/nofeminazis/index.htm
*"the most outrageous aspect is the total and i mean TOTAL silence from women. hell, they could care less. makes me sick." ~ donnieboy57

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by MrReality on Wed, 2007-06-20 18:32