Woman Charged With Abuse of Corpse After Baby Is Found in Her Freezer

Ok, so let me get this straight: Child dies:

Female = Abuse
Male = Murder

Now, they say a fetus is not a human being. So why was Scott Peterson handed two (2) chrages f murder or murdering his pregnant wife?

Think about it, since 1973, women have killed 40 MILLION lives and it is legal and even condoned but when a man does it....a fetus is considered a life.

*cop opens freezer*

"MY God! I found a baby in here! Murder! Murder!"

*looks at suspect closely*
*realizes it's a woman*

"Oh...it's just a helpless baby, must be a fetus! Sorry ma'am, please don't sue me for yelling in your apartment."

This should tell men to stop censoring each other and to get their overly chivalrous butts in gear. Chivalry is dead, stupid. Everytime you hold a door for a woman that would never hold the door for you, pay for her dinner(even though she has money), tell her she is a "strong woman", or any other pansy-like butt kissing men regularly engage in while blocking other men from revealing truth. You are contributing to the death of children and men via the so-called empowerment of the "royal sex." Several of my articles which show flat-out how devious women are and how men can come together to stop them have been censored by MEN.

Men are overly concerned with being fair to their women as opposed to being fair to other MEN. Serves men right that women are breaking them out of their fem-fantasies. Men don't want to hear the truth or REALLY fight against feminism. That means organizing with other men and not putting up with ANY nonsense that supports empowered women. Until men learn they DESERVE slavery.

Good comment MrReality.

This is the real crux of the gender privilege. When two people can commit the same crime and one is held accountable because of his sex, we have moved beyond "feminist equality" la-la land and into serious territory. MrReality speaks the truth that men are more concerned with being fair to women while women are only concerned about being fair to women.

I wouldn't say that it serves men right, since that would be blaming a lot of men who just were brought up to think that women could do no wrong.

http://petepatriarch.blogspot.com

Police also questioned the woman's ex-boyfriend but said they do not believe he was the father. He was not charged.

Lucky guy! If he'd been the father you'd see his face on the front page of every newspaper and round the clock coverage on every news station in the USA after they charged him with first degree murder, abusing her, abusing the baby, and abuse of a corpse.

But since she obviously had no idea who the daddy was probably because she sleeps around allot - I mean gets raped or something allot - and clearly some one don't like her enough that they called the cops on this child killer.

Woman kills kid = no big deal. It was just a kid. She can have more and kill them to if she wants. You know, whatever makes her happy

Man kills kid = society kills man
and in 7 US states already and probably coming soon to a State near you...
Man has sex with kid = society kills man

Yup, men get more severe punishments for sex then women get for murder, but don't you ever forget it's women who aren't getting a fair shake and are discriminated against by our laws.

Someone should have stuck her in the freezer along with the fetus since extremely angry women that murder children aren't "human beings."

Watch somebody call that very real comment "anti-woman." Men are such weaklings.

Hi MrReality. I would say your comment is more "anti-men" than "anti-women" actually.

"Men are such weaklings". Clearly you are not in support of men. A real man doesn't need to tear down his fellow men and women. A real man doesn't need to sport such an obvious inferiority complex. Tell me MrReality, are you a feminist plant because you sure come off sounding like one. If this is the kind of support you have to offer the men's rights movement then piss off. Your hateful words do more harm than good.

That comment is anti-woman AND anti-man.

Do you hate everyone?

Call me a weakling if you like, it doesn't bother me in the least.

That INDIVIDUAL woman committed an atrocity and she deserves to be harshly punished by the courts.

But you're saying a GROUP of women aren't human beings. Even human beings who commit terrible crimes are still human beings.

How do you like it when a man or men in general are dehumanized? Can you understand why it is so counter-productive and harmful to dehumanize anyone?

I find it funny that the men here get "up-in-arms" over someone pointing out the horrible things women are doing, yet you can count on ONE HAND how many men responded to the plight of the black slaves forced to mine diamonds.

I think that speaks volumes about whether men are slaves to women or not. The women really have done a number on these guys. They attack black issues readily--giving no positive comment on them, even derailing threads about black males--but talk too harsh about a woman and the men here are on you like white on rice.

They say the feminists hijacked the civil rights movement and falsely claimed that women were like blacks; well a good deal of the men here are finishing the job. Sad.....really.

Neither Paragon nor I dismissed the issue of black men being forced into slavery to mine diamonds. We were taking issue with your choice of words and with your suggestion that we were ignoring the plight of these men because they're black. It's quite the opposite (as I've said in several comments lately) - we need to pay more attention to the issues facing minority men, because feminists HAVE hijacked the civil rights movement and stolen attention from the very legitimate issues facing minorities all over the world.

You're right to be upset about that. Just try to remember that there are good women out there, and that there are women who are very much on our side despite the fact that women can do some pretty horrible things too.

I can see eye to eye with you but for some reason Paragon comes off as a racist. He continously attempts to belittle the plight of black males in a condescending manner.

To tell the truth it has been said that some Canadians are extremely racist. Right now he is proving that statement to be true.

Can you please explain your definition of racist because I'm lost here if you are saying Canada is a racist country.

When there is absolutely no where on this Earth that you can find a place where there are people from more races living side by side with no war, extremely low crime rates, no history of slavery against blacks, and freedom of religion how can you possibly label that place racist?

Maybe it is you who need to close your eyes to race. You are right, I disagree with Ax that the needs of minorities should take a special place in the mens movement. I don't think that at all. In fact I think the opposite. All are welcome on the same terms. Just like all comers are welcome in my country on the same terms.

Here's an alternative theory about your Blood diamonds post not stirring up the riotous vengeance in many men that has nothing to do with race. Africa is another continent across an ocean. It's not home. People tend to get worked up more about whats going on at home then they do about what's going on half a world away. I'm not saying it's right or wrong. I'm not even saying it's the reason for your thread not attaining your desired affect. Just mentioning it because its a common human behavior to care more about one's own backyard then their neighbors.

Canada is the solution to racism by the way, not the source. If the world was as tolerant as Canada there would be no more racism.

This whole issue is obviously a sensitive one for you, so I can completely understand why you might react fast and furious when there's any disagreement.

I've been conversing with Paragon for quite a while and he's never shown the slightest sign of being racist, nor do I think he's being racist now. In fact, he seems a very decent guy who's genuinely interested in the welfare of men everywhere, regardless of race or nationality. He just disagrees with those of us who think race issues merit special attention within the framework of men's activism. That's his opinion, and I respect it even if I disagree with it.

What I'm saying is ease off a bit, MrReality - just because he doesn't agree with you on that one point doesn't make him a racist, or your enemy. He's one of the good guys. No friendly fire!

Out of respect for YOU RandomMan I'll just ignore the negative--or what I perceive as being negative--portions of Paragon's posts. Thanks for intervening.

I can definitely be confrontational. Especially if I have suspicions about some ones intentions.

But, I'm not here to attack other MRAs. I won't let this site or our movement be discredited though, by those who's only motivation is hate and only interest is vengeance.

I want change as badly as most and I'm putting my well being at stake for it - I'm engaged in a lawsuit against my local police service and provincial government which trust me, isn't the safest route to take because cops tend to take getting sued very personally. Something about being told their whole careers that they can do no wrong...

I still am not certain about your motives - as you're not about me - but I'm happy to give you the benefit of the doubt.

If I thought you were entirely disingenuous I simply wouldn't bother even replying to your posts.

I don't doubt you believe in the cause of men's rights.

Plus I have noticed you've toned down the unbridled anger in your posts recently and I do appreciate that.