No Mention of Taking McCartney for Millions

Submitted by Matt on Tue, 2007-03-20 14:58

She wows the audience with her 'courage'. Seems the inconvenient truth that she recently took Paul McCartney for millions is left entirely out of the article. Story here. Excerpt:

'The ABC dancing contest, returning for its fourth season, was a big hit in the past. But adding a new level of interest and curiosity this go-around is the presence of the 39-year-old activist and estranged wife of former Beatle Paul McCartney as one of the 11 celebrity contestants.
...
"You've got more guts than Rambo," said Bruno Tonioli, who went on to criticize not her legs but her top half -- her arms -- during the performance.
...
It may also be a chance to repair an image that has suffered during her bitter breakup with McCartney, from whom she separated last May after four years of marriage. The couple, who have a 3-year-old daughter, began divorce proceedings in July.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

People listen to McCartney's ex for the same reason some people (and the media) have been mourning Anna Nicole 24 hours per day..mainly, these talentless worthless women marry rich guys, then when they get divorced or the guy dies a couple years later, and the women acquire big bucks, they become celebrities by virtue of these events. If they hadn't married rich and/or famous guys, they would be absolute unknowns.

-ax

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by axolotl on Fri, 2007-03-23 17:37

This is off-tangent, but it occurs to me that Sir Paul's current pop media soap opera vis a vis Heather Mills is just a continuation of the whole tragic Beatles' legacy of losing to women.

Paul, the "cute one," gets financially harvested by a known escort service concubine. What do you expect from the guy who wrote "Michelle My Bell..."?

George, the "spiritual one," got his wife stolen by a dude with better blues chops.

John, "the political one," was in thrall to Yoko, a psychotic pseudo exotic performance artist who makes more money off him dead than she ever enjoyed when he was pre-shot.

And rumor has it that Ringo (the "just-glad-to-be-a-Beatle-one") is still technically a virgin.

So, what's up with the Beatles' sad history of finding anything but love with their women?

Personally, I always thought the Stones had the correct attitude .... "Under My Thumb" being a far better strutting MRA polemic than the pleading and plaintive "Yesterday."

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Roy on Sat, 2007-03-24 17:23