NYTimes Magazine: "The Women's War"

Seems the way out of fulfilling a duty she volunteered for is for a woman is to claim sexual harassment on top of PTSD. Then, going AWOL is fine. In fact, you get a 16-page nationally-syndicated news story about yourself written in a very sympathetic way.

Just try this if you're a man.

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

We're equal!

But we're special, delicate little flowers who need special treatment and rights and laws!

We're equal!

But we're special, delicate little flowers who need special treatment and rights and laws!

Rinse, repeat.

How do feminists and manginas keep track of which one it is today? Is it the whole lunar/menstrual connection that makes women such cyclical creatures? It certainly would explain plenty of things.

Like0 Dislike0

women force themselves into a predominately male occupation - such as the armed forces, and wonder why bad things sometimes happen. Certainly, she did not ask to be raped or attacked, however, why would a woman REALLY want to get into the armed services? WHAT IS SHE TRYING TO PROVE?

If women were placed only in all female platoons there would be no problems. However, if they saw REAL combat duty, i'd imagine the casualties would be higher than a men's detail.

oregon dad

Like0 Dislike0

This article is a stunning indictment of why women should *not* be in the military. Her actions related to going AWOL previous to her (undoubtedly false) accusations about sexual harrasment shows just how cowardly she really is.

Yes, obviously being in the military and seeing your own friends killed in car bomb attacks and having your own life constantly threatened is a harsh reality and stressful. War is hell just as much for men as for women.

But once again we see the feministas trying to deny this reality and turn hell into a bed-of-roses. Well honey, we never promised you a rose garden. Suck it up or get the F out.

Like0 Dislike0