Norway: Minister vows to protect circumcision after voting to ban it

Article here. Excerpt:

'The leader of Norway’s second-largest party said she would not advance prohibitions against non-medical circumcision of boys younger than 18 after she voted for a motion opposing the ritual.

Siv Jensen, the leader of the Progress Party — a coalition partner of the ruling Conservative Party — voted in favor of a motion opposing ritual circumcision during the annual party convention held June 6 north of Oslo.

Jensen, who is Norway’s finance minister, later said she had intended to vote against the motion, which passed with a comfortable majority, explaining the voting was “confusing.” She also said she “respects the will” of the majority of party members who voted in favor of the ban.

Yet during a meeting Monday in Oslo with a rabbi from Belgium and another rabbi from the Netherlands, Jensen said she would not advance prohibitions on the ritual.'

60 users have voted.
I like this


Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Privilege Test

I've noticed that a good measure of how privileged a group is in society entails determining if this group's feelings are ever considered more important than another group's actual physical well being.

An obvious example is women vis-a-vis men. There are numerous instances in which women's feelings are considered more important than a man's actual physical well-being. Remember Clinton's quote "women are the primary victims of war. They lose their husbands, sons, and brothers." ? This is a prime example of what I'm referring to.

I have also noticed that religious groups get this privilege, especially when it comes to forced bodily alterations and abuse of children. Therefore, I do not consider Jews and muslims to be oppressed. If such was the case, there is no way their barbarism against children would be condoned in the west.

16 users have voted.
I like this