Rolling Stone to Publish Review of Disputed Rape Article

Article here. Excerpt:

'Rolling Stone magazine plans to publish an external review of a widely disputed article about a gang rape at the University of Virginia “in the next couple of weeks,” its managing editor, Will Dana, said on Sunday.

The 9,000-word article, which was published in November, was based on the account of a female student who described being sexually assaulted by seven men in a dark room during a fraternity house party.

The article quickly became part of a national debate over sexual assault on college campuses, and the university suspended the fraternity’s operations. But in early December, substantial portions of the article were called into question. Rolling Stone acknowledged that it had not sought to independently corroborate the woman’s account, and that it had doubts about the veracity of the story. Shortly afterward, it announced a review of the article would be led by Steve Coll, dean of the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

The less they talk about it, the better. The review will do what, exonerate RS? The specifics don't really matter. The big picture is already known: No fact-checking or counter-interviews or actual journalistic investigation was done. They just went to press with it. There, I could've saved them all that $. How do I know all this? Because they admitted to it already.

Just.Walk.Away. But no, they had to return to the scene of the crime.

Like0 Dislike0