Father banned from seeing children and going home for 10 years

Submitted by charlie on Mon, 2014-12-15 22:18

Story here. Many men suffer this to a lesser degree, but apparently this case was sufficiently bad to make the news. Excerpt:

'A father suffered a Kafkaesque injustice when he was thrown out of his home without warning and effectively barred from seeing his six children for five months, a High Court judge said yesterday.

After being banned from his street, the man was later jailed overnight and convicted of a crime for phoning his wife.

Mr Justice Jackson accused lawyers and courts of injustice due to ‘unproven allegations’. 

The father, named only as Mr R, was barred from his home after his wife took out a non-molestation order.

He was also forbidden from contacting her except via her lawyers.

Such orders are designed to protect women from domestic violence.

But Mr Justice Jackson said the ban was granted ‘in proceedings of which [Mr R] was unaware’.

The hearing before a district judge on June 20 lasted no more than five minutes.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

Sorry to be a wet blanket, but if you don't want to risk being summarily convicted in absentia (or not even convicted at all) and have a judge restrict your fundamental human right to freedom of movement within your own country, nation, tribal lands, etc., just reproduce. The chances of you winding up in jail or being deprived of liberty shoots up super-fast.

Of course for men already fathers, it's too late. But for men unthreatened at the moment by paternity under feminist protocol jurisprudence as it is in the UK, US, Canada, etc., save yourself the risk/trouble and do whatever you need to to not become a dad.

Like0 Dislike0
Submitted by Matt on Wed, 2014-12-17 16:16