"Why Doctors Should Start Screening Men To Spot Potential Abusers"

Article here. Excerpt:

'There’s been a lot of conversation about domestic violence lately, thanks to theongoing controversy over the way the NFL has responded to a surveillance tape of former Baltimore Ravens running back Ray Rice punching his then-fiancee in the head. Public figures ranging from thenewly crowned Miss America to the president of the United States have weighed in about the fact that violence against women is never acceptable.
...
An increasing number of medical groups— including the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, which helps determine what services are covered under the health reform law — now recommend that doctors should screen all of their female patients for evidence of intimate partner violence (IPV). Since domestic violence leads to both short-term and long-term health problems, medical professionals are uniquely positioned to be able to spot the signs. The federal guidelines specifically apply to women of childbearing age, since they’re most at risk for becoming victims of domestic abuse.

But what if doctors shifted the focus and also started looking for potential abusers? Although very little work has been done in that field so far, the men who engage in IPV are regularly coming into contact with medical professionals, according to a new study examining the characteristics of abusers. It may be possible to teach doctors about the warning signs that suggest a male patient could be abusing his partner.
...
Doctors start referring their patients to batterers’ intervention programs, which focus on reforming men’s behavior and holding them accountable for abuse. Experts in the field have pointed out that batterers’ intervention programs currently serve a very small portion of the male population, since they typically only see the men who are mandated by court to complete a program. Referrals from the health care sector could help widen that scope.'

Like0 Dislike0

Comments

... start screening women for their potential to lie about being abused, abuse their bfs/etc. themselves, etc."

That'll be the day we see that headline...

Like0 Dislike0

...and then I realized that I had misread the headline. I thought that someone was finally suggesting that male patients be screened for abuse, just as female patients already are. Silly me, I forgot that men are never victims, only abusers. When will I learn?

In addition to all of the other problems that this suggestion presents, add to it the potential to keep men from seeking medical care. A large percentage of men already avoid seeing doctors, which means that they miss out on preventative care and early interventions.

How much worse will this become, if men now fear that doctors will accuse them of being abusers?

Oh, but of course, my mistake was in assuming that men's health is of concern to anyone.

Like0 Dislike0

The idea being presented here is really just a version of the sociological concept of labelling theory.

True, I give sociology a hard time and joke about it's uselessness relentlessly, but there are a few concepts that actually come in handy. Labelling theory is one such theory.

The idea is basically that society stigmatizes those who have a label affixed to them by the medical establishment. It usually is spoken of in the context of mental health problems, but clearly screening men for the potential to be an abuser is a new arm of this disturbing trend. I'd like to see what a feminist with a background in sociology would have to say to that. :)

Sadly, this means that StayingFit is absolutely right. People avoid treatment for mental health problems because of labelling theory. Now men are going to avoid getting treatment whenever it appears they were in an altercation, or for any of the symptoms listed in the article.

It's a sad day to be a male.

It really speaks volumes when the U.S. is starting to seem like more of a leftist hell than Canada.

Like0 Dislike0