Rand T. writes ""Spin Sisters: How the Women of the Media Sell Unhappiness and Liberalism to the Women of America" by former Ladies Home Journal editor Myrna Blyth, exposes the predominance of liberal, feminist-leaning journalists in women's magazines.

Aricles:
first
,
second
and
third"

Matt writes "Well, 'bout time! yahoo is featuring Men's Health Week. A pleasant surprise. The feature links to this page: here"

mens_issues writes "Today I saw a Foley's ad on some of the plasma TV's hanging in the middle of the FlatIron Crossing Mall (Broomfield, CO). This showed a male mannequin admiring a woman who was trying on clothes in the store. A female mannequin next to him then hit him over the head with her purse. Afterwards, he looked humbled while she had a smug smile on her face.

I’m so sick of companys marketing misandry.

Here is Foley's home page."

CJ writes Here is a little good news for men (and women) who like to have a drink now and then. Drinking in moderation appears to reduce heart-related deaths in men with high blood pressure, new research suggests, challenging the belief among many doctors that alcohol should be off-limits to such patients. It is nice to see a contemporary study with a focus on men for a change in the Boston Globe."

Thomas writing now. I've now seen reports on numerous studies indicating that drinking in moderation is good for one's health (typically one drink per day for women and two drinks per day for men). Of course, there are always caveats published with the results. Some of the studies have indicated that wine, especially red wine, is best for one's health. Others seem to indicate that it is ethanol that has the health benefits. Every report that I've read warns about excessive consumption and emphasizes that individual circumstances are of critical importance. In any case, it is good to see this study done with such a large sample of men. 14,125. Wow.

Looks like ol' George is following through, and the results may well be magnificent. (I might actually vote for this guy. That's a mind bender, but a different story. Hell, I might even campaign for him.) This FoxNews.com article reports on how the Bush administration is "following through on a promise to make it easier for school districts across the country to operate girls-only and boys-only schools".

Of course, the article goes on and on about females' educational needs and never mentions how boys are lagging far behind girls in school these days. Nevertheless, this is great news. I went to an all-boys high school. It was one of the greatest experiences of my life, and that was before feminist teacheresses and administratoresses turned schools into bastions of anti-male indoctrination.

It's a lot to say, but I think this education-movement may prove to be one of the most important advances/corrections in American culture in decades.

Sorry. I'm not sure why, but this got posted twice, so I'm deleting the text message here. If you're going to discuss this topic, please do so on the other thread.

Thanks.

Mangesh writes "I came across this news report from South Africa. Looks like the authorities in that country are taking the problem seriously and initiating measures to tackle it. Read it here".

Trudy W Schuett writes "I've begun posting another previously-published novel of mine in blog form at The DesertLight Journal here.

This is "Friends to the End", about a male victim of domestic violence. This is a subject that seldom comes to light, due to society's resistance to the idea that a man could actually be a victim.

While it is fiction, I've been told by men who have been in this situation, that it is in fact, quite true to life.

Readers can make a donation to the Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men at the link provided at the DLJ."

Am I to believe Rachel Snyder's book on amazon called "What There Is to Love About a Man" has only two reviews? Outrageous! you know what to do.

Ray Blumhorst writes "What influences in American culture have led these females to believe that "a girl kissing a boy" deserves this kind of behavioral reaction?
Females Batter Child Into Coma Has radical feminist ideology so stigmatized heterosexuality that "puppy love" now triggers such a violent reaction?"



Registration required.

Anonymous User writes "There is another report of a woman, by the name of Sinead E. O'Brien, charged with submitting a false rape report to the police. She was charged 1 week ago. The case also occurred in Rhode Island, the same state where another woman, Stephanie E. Estep, was also charged on the very following day.

Thomas writing now: The second case is discussed on MANN here. And here's a discussion of the hateful, feminist declaration that women don't lie about rape.

Julian Abbott writes "In the UK, A divorced police officer begins a sex discrimination challenge against his force today, accusing senior officers of adopting practices that favour single working mothers over single fathers."

CJ writes "STOCKHOLM (Reuters) - A Swedish man who paid alimony for 13 years for a child he knew was not his has been proven right and now wants half a million crowns ($65,000) in compensation."

Thomas writing now: Maybe the law wouldn't allow it, but it's too bad the man isn't trying to have the mother imprisoned for fraud.

Wendy McElroy has published an essay on FoxNews.com (probably read by quite a few people) about the cold reception being given to Naomi Wolf's most recent claim to victimhood. As McElroy points out, "a cultural tide has turned."

It's been my personal experience to find that, here at the hypocenter of the Kobe Bryant tempest, women as well as men are no longer falling for the vile claim that women don't lie about rape. Most of the people with whom I've spoken about the Bryant case, at least those who state their opinion on the matter (and in many cases they're the ones who broach the topic), say they believe he's innocent. And several, including women, have expressed outrage at this nation's plague of false accusations against men.

Hey, Ray. Do you have a T-shirt that states, "Imprison False Accusers"?

It cracks me up that so many feminists still claim that differences between males and females are social constructs and that the world will be far better off once men's artificial masculinity has been properly deconstructed along the lines of feminist doctrine. It's as though mainstream feminists, in the face of a growing torrent of scientific evidence, are hell bent on making laughing stocks of themselves.

Here's yet another piece of evidence debunking that ridiculous feminist myth. With respect to the long "debate about how much sexual behaviour was biological and how much was learned," Dr. Darren Russell, senior lecturer in sexual health at Melbourne University, states, "I think more and more we're moving toward a biological model of sex, that a large part of our sexual behaviour and other behaviours are preordained... A lot of our sexual chemistry and behaviour is probably determined before birth."

I s'pose many fembots will eventually drop their claim that differences between males and females are social constructs and instead state that males and females are fundamentally different and females are, by nature, superior.

NB: Joe Manthey submitted this related essay on the importance of biological differences between males and females.