|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by blaze4metal on 11:22 AM June 1st, 2006 EST (#1)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Teen boys are not seen as victims but as developing young men who are "experimenting" with their sexuality, Hislop said.
Well it's rape when it's under 18 no matter what the consentment is. Older women should know better just as older men should. I am sick of excuses by the feminized-media.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|
| |
 |
|
 |
 |
by Roy on 04:21 PM June 1st, 2006 EST (#3)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Teachers' Pets?
Are teachers who sleep with boys getting off?
By William Saletan
http://www.slate.com/id/2134158
"At first glance, the sentences look biased. The men got an average of more than 11 years; the women got less than two. But compare the crimes, and the story gets more complicated.
Most of the men molested victims younger than 15; most of the women didn't.* Half the men molested multiple victims; only three of the women did.
Ten men on the list had multiple victims, including victims younger than 16. These men earned an average sentence of more than 17 years, drastically inflating the average."
If anyone can make sense of this article and post your conclusions, it would be appreciated.
At one point the author argues that female sexual predators get lighter sentences becasue they were "in love" with their boy-victims.
Whereas male sexual predators merely objectify their targets.
I'm confused.
I thought rape was rape, despite the romance...
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
 |
 |
by Rand T. on 04:17 AM June 2nd, 2006 EST (#4)
|
|
 |
 |
 |
He admits that his article search consisted of the key word "sexual assault" -- we all know how many times the media describe male students as having been "sexually assaulted" by female teachers.
He cherry picks and distorts his statistics. The Department of Justice statistics on rape and sexual assaults have nothing to do with statutory rape (not only that, but the federal definition of "rape" is sexual coercion of a *female*.)
I looked up the review he cites for "80 percent to 96 percent of offenders were male." It actually says that 57-96% of offenders were male, with the former being based on studies of statistically representative interviews of students, whereas the latter are based on: 1. "educators investigated for educator sexual misconduct" ("investigated" could mean false accusation), 2. A survey of child care workers in Yorkshire, England about their sexual interest in children, 3. analysis of cases in newspapers (probably using "rape" or "sexual assault" as key word search).
I wouldn't rely too much on this article. It seems to be pure propaganda with the typical distortions and deceptions that go with the territory.
|
|
 |
 |
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|