Out-of-This-World Sex

	posted by Thomas on 11:45 PM November 17th, 2005
	This is an interesting presentation of the sexual concerns of astronauts on long missions. It's a theoretical matter today, but in the future a number of people may be personally involved with the issue.

<  Stud Farm in Nevada | Problems with Assisted Reproduction Technique  >

  

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

So? (Score:2) by Dittohd on 08:19 PM November 18th, 2005 EST (#1) So what does this have to do with men's activism? Between this and the sperm artificial insemination article, I wonder if the monitors here aren't out to lunch. Dittohd All anonymous postings on my screen are filtered. To talk with or debate me, a user ID is now required. Thanks.

Re:So? The Gravity of the Issue? (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 08:48 PM November 18th, 2005 EST (#2) It's my understanding that all of this space-voyage sex-titillation is mute anyway. All of the human fantasies about voyaging into "outer" space depend upon the invention of artificial gravity technology, or beyond light-speed technology. At present, (and according to Einstein, permanently) both are impossible. Humans as living organisms depend upon gravity to provide the resistance required to support muscles, heartbeats, lungs, equilibrium, spatial logic, etc. In outer space without gravity, it is already known theoretically that human beings would grow weaker and weaker, progressively demented over time (even the brain requires gravity to get blood), until they died as puddles of incoherent jelly. This does not seem to be in the current Top Ten of men's rights issues....

Not Relevant (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 06:32 AM November 19th, 2005 EST (#3) I agree with dittohd - this is not an internet board for the publication of articles that are of interest to the moderators. If we need these articles to give another dimension to discussions between like minded people, why not have an "Off Topic" sub forum on the site? Rob

Re:Not Relevant (Score:2) by Dittohd on 12:39 AM November 20th, 2005 EST (#8) >why not have an "Off Topic" sub forum on the site? I vote for an "Off Topic" sub forum on another site. Dittohd All anonymous postings on my screen are filtered. To talk with or debate me, a user ID is now required. Thanks.

Re:Not Relevant (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 01:03 PM November 19th, 2005 EST (#5) So every time a subject is not relevant to men's issues, you say; "Oh my God! they killed Kenny"? I think I get it. Killing Kenny has nothing to do with men's issues, so you use it as a symbol to make that statement. Kind of like saying; "What's that got to do with the price of eggs in China?" That's kind of funny. ...I guess...,   Thundercloud.   "Hoka hey!"

Re:Not Relevant (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 01:40 PM November 19th, 2005 EST (#6) You got it.

Re:Not Relevant (Score:0) by Anonymous User on 07:15 PM November 19th, 2005 EST (#7) Oh my God! they killed Kenny I've never posted these words on this board. I spotted 2 consecutive header posts which seem to me to be "fillers". I have pointed this out and suggested an "Off Topic" sub forum. You may be confusing me with someone else. Rob

[an error occurred while processing this directive]