[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Men's Issues and The Psychiatric Society of Westchester
posted by Thomas on 06:04 PM November 11th, 2005
Feature Submission The Psychiatric Society of Westchester has formed the first Committee on Men’s Issues within a branch of the American Psychiatric Association.

Click "Read More" for a fascinating article, written by Edward M. Stephens, M.D., Chair, Committee on Men's Issues, The Psychiatric Society of Westchester, (a district branch of The American Psychiatric Association) and President, NCFM, Greater New York Chapter.

Special thanks to Peter Allemano for alerting us to this development and to NCFM's Greater New York Chapter as well as The Male Voice e-newsletter, www.themalevoice.org.


THE DECLINE OF MALES (originally published in The Westchester Psychiatrist and reproduced with permission)

by Edward M. Stephens, M.D.
Chair, Committee on Men's Issues
The Psychiatric Society of Westchester
(a district branch of The American Psychiatric Association)
- and -
President, NCFM, Greater New York Chapter

________________________________

“Gender, not geography will determine the direction of world resource use in the 21st Century.”

In my recent dinner with Professor Lionel Tiger, the talk was all about sex. Not the stuff you have in bed but its __expression in the more abstract, less sticky and infinitely more complex question of gender.

Lionel, the Charles Darwin Professor of Anthropology at Rutgers University and the author of The Decline of Males, had become the strange bedfellow of a psychiatrist out of a shared concern for the declining prospects for males. Our dinner conversation was about the prospect of creating a Department for International Men’s Studies at a major university and the ground breaking formation of The Committee on Men’s Issues of The Psychiatric Society of Westchester (PSW).

As psychiatrists, gender is not usually high on our list of causative factors for diagnostic concern. That 20th century perspective changes when we begin to understand that gender is destiny in the 21st century and it is not just the women’s movement that is affecting our world view. Tiger opines that a basic change has occurred in our relation as men and women. Through the shift in the control of reproduction, women are now able to manage their reproductive function with the Pill with no one but themselves knowing whether it is their time or not. Men are out of the loop for the first time in the history of our species.

Learning from Primates

Austin, the stump tail monkey, found this out in the ’70s study of progesterone when it was given sequentially to his three active sex partners in the primate troop. He lost interest in his favorite mate when she was on birth control and regained it when the progesterone effect wore off. When all three of his mates were on the stuff, Austin became nervous, irritable and began to masturbate, refusing sex with all three of his sexual partners. Austin’s story is relevant to us since he and his partners are our closest primate relatives.

Although Austin was confused when his partners signaled pheromonally that they were artificially pregnant with a birth control substance, his mates didn’t compound the problem by changing life roles. Austin’s mates, released from their sexual obligations, didn’t take up 60% of undergraduate places in college or 75% of graduate spots. They didn’t get pregnant outside of marriage as women all over the industrialized world are doing. They didn’t create single parent families. They didn’t divorce Austin. They didn’t change the nature of the workforce, displacing Austin. They did demonstrate that primate sexual responses are radically altered by chemical birth control without signs being posted and they make us wonder about the profound and unexplored effects on our species of change in reproductive responsibility.

Austin got cranky and aggressive when a major change was made in the fundamental nature of his relationship to his gender-mates. What is happening to us as men and women in the midst of the changes we so glibly characterize as “women’s liberation”? What is happening to one half of our patient population who are sometimes characterized as alexithymic and whose needs have become socially invisible as the male gender is increasingly characterized as “the problem”? Today’s men seem as surprised as Austin that they are living in a different world, over which they have very little control.

Men’s Issues?

When I went into The Committee on Women’s Issues at the national meeting of the APA, asking for help to set up a corresponding Committee for men, I received some interesting responses. By and large, I think that the Committee members thought I was far fetching until some hard core sentiment emerged from one of the members: “The whole organization of the APA is about men’s issues.”

Fortunately, that’s not the response I got from the leadership of PSW and many of the female psychiatrists to whom I presented the concept, so that PSW has the first Committee on Men’s Issues (COMI) in the APA. COMI has invited Lionel Tiger to speak to us in person and describe the crisis in men’s lives not just in Western societies but also on a worldwide basis. (Editor’s note: This special event was attended by members of NCFM, GNY, and a report on it was featured in The Male Voice e-newsletter.)

The Canary in the Coal Mine

For many years, we have been appalled as a society about what is happening to our men of color. In some communities, there are unemployment rates of up to 50%. Murder rates by men of men in these communities are as startling as are rates of drug and alcohol addiction and incarceration. Alarmingly, “all the indices that were commonly thought to be confined to the African-American community are in fact rising more quickly in white communities. The prevailing African-American situation is part of the American system, and its characteristics are shared in other countries,” according to Prof. Tiger. While the illustration appears to create race as a significant element, it is actually “a spurious and imprecise category that has nothing to do with biogenetic competence.” We know this because when men of all colors are allowed to perform on a level playing field, as in the armed services, men of all backgrounds perform equally well. “Race is skin deep, but sex is implicated in many fundamental human systems.”

Until we begin to appreciate the sea changes taking place in the world of employment, we are out of touch with the world of these men. Each year in the United States there are one million fewer jobs created for men than for women; men, unlike women, are not culturized to the concept of “part time work.” The net effect for our office practice is that we have a cohort of depressed men who are having what we might euphemistically call an “adjustment reaction of adult life” for whom we may have no adequate counsel because we are unaware of the major economic shifts taking place as a result of the new alignments of gender in the workplace. Then, even when they might be candidates for antidepressants, we hesitate to interfere with their already fragile maleness because we don’t want to depress their sex lives.

In the Committee on Men’s Issues, we are looking for some answers. What may be more important for us as psychiatrists will be the new set of questions that come up for us about our men and boys, brothers and fathers, husbands and sons, our patients and ourselves.

________________________________

The Psychiatric Society of Westchester’s Committee on Men’s Issues was founded by Dr. Stephens and is the first-ever such committee within a district branch of the APA. Dr. Stephens can be contacted in care of NCFM, GNY via e-mail at ncfmgny@themalevoice.org or by leaving a telephonic message at (516) 482-6378.

NCFM, NY and GLBT Community Working Together | Concord Monitor Reports on Men's Commission Findings  >

  
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
All I can say is... (Score:1)
by Hunchback on 09:46 PM November 11th, 2005 EST (#1)
Hallelujah!

Definition of "alexithymic" (Score:2)
by mens_issues on 11:31 PM November 11th, 2005 EST (#2)
I had never seen the word "alexithymic" before, and coudln't find it in my online dictionary. I did find this in a google search of alexithymia:

http://www.alexithymia.info/onlinedefs.html

Here is one of many definitions:

alexithymia n. a lack of psychological understanding of one's own emotions and moods. It is considered by some psychiatrists to be a way in which people develop psychosomatic symptoms.

Now let's see ... just what might make a man "alexithymic" in the first place?

Societal expectations?

A reaction to a misandric society?

Steve


Re:Definition of "alexithymic" (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 09:20 AM November 12th, 2005 EST (#3)
"Now let's see ... just what might make a man "alexithymic" in the first place?"

Industrialized society was the first step, IMHO. It was the first step in removing men from the family circle essential to their well being. It was also the first step in sending the message to the family, "You can live without father around."

Having been raised on a farm, I had the benefit of both mother and father in my life to a far greater extent than most kids in America. With increased global competition in the past several decades (not to mention the effect of the insidious gender feminist movement) the stress factor on men has sky rocketed, while their connections to familial support has harshly declined.

Industrialization has negatively impacted the synchronization of all human beings with the natural environment their beings are an integral part of. Mankind, in attempting to technologically master his environment, has knowingly altered it in ways greatly to his advantage. Less knowingly, mankind has also changed it in harmful ways clearly not anticipated.

R
Re:Definition of "alexithymic" (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 04:18 PM November 12th, 2005 EST (#4)
My reading of history suggests that it is the young women who are first lured into the factories in pre-industrial societies. The men and boys continue minding the farms, the women continue their home-making duties, and the older girls trudge off to the factories to earn extra money for their families, and establish a foothold in the city. As the industries develop, and farming becomes more mechanized, the men are pretty much forced into joining the industrial work force. It goes down hill from there.
NCFM-NY (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 04:34 PM November 12th, 2005 EST (#5)
I have nothing but respect for Dr. Ed Stephens and Peter Allemano of the New York chapter of NCFM. They're doing great things.

Marc A.
Don't get sucked in (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 08:41 PM November 13th, 2005 EST (#6)
These people aren't talking about men's rights. They are saying that men are in "decline", that men are in "crisis" and that "men need to change their ways".

These people are, I believe, fem-boys of the left. They're preaching all the same words that the fem-boys preach all over the western world today.

A visit to their website confirms my thoughts.

I find it difficult to believe that the good users of this site would be gullible enough to be sucked into this scam. They want to mould men to fit their new world - not to rectify the situation and bring about real justice and rights for men.

Do be careful. Not all men who speak to men's pain want to genuinely help men. They often seek to socially re-engineer them to be less of a threat to their ideology and leftist state. This is the work of Marxists.


Re:Don't get sucked in (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 02:43 AM November 14th, 2005 EST (#7)
Excellent point, Anonymous. I feel the same way about Warren Farrell. He does a good job pointing out why men get the short end of the stick, but his solution is for men to change, to be some New Age kind of creature. Blech!
Re:Don't get sucked in (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 06:49 AM November 14th, 2005 EST (#8)
Thanks for the vote of confidence Anon. And you raised a very good point about this Warren Farrel. I've never read his books, but I've read a lot of quotes from them. On that basis I won't shoot him down, but I have my suspicions. You've just made those suspicions a bit firmer.

Despite that, all men have to keep their wits about them today. God damn it we're men - we know what's right, we don't need academics and newspaper media people telling us what's our job or what's been "dicovered" in some new brain dead study. We just know what men, good decent ordinary men should do and while we stick to that, they'll never defeat us.
Re:Don't get sucked in (Score:1)
by Uberganger on 09:06 AM November 14th, 2005 EST (#9)
I remember back in the early 1990s reading an article in OMNI (of all places!) by a woman called Carol Bly, warning against something she called the 'charismatic men's movement' and extolling the virtues of something called the 'therapeutic men's movement'. This 'therapeutic men's movement' seems to be what these psychiatrists are the latest manifestation of. In essense, it views any dissent towards feminism, even implicit dissent (ie. a negative reaction to one's new 'role') as some kind of disease that has to be treated. Much the same thing occurred in Communist Russia, where dissenters were sometimes subjected to psychiatric treatment - including brain surgery - on the grounds that anyone who disagreed with Communism must have something wrong with their brain!

What's especially worrying about these developments are the avenues they create for men. For example, in the area of domestic violence, feminists are seeing to it that the only avenues available to men are batterer intervention programmes, so even if you're a battered man you get steered in that direction (the Primary Aggressor Rule is perhaps the most direct expression of this tendency, since it transforms the male victim into the abuser). The kind of avenues these psychiatrists are likely to create will comform to a similar pattern. Any harm feminism does to men will be viewed as the man's fault; as a product of 'sexism' - his inability to accept that women are better than him, or better suited to the modern world. While women will be told from the earliest age that they can do anything and be anything, men will be endlessly prodded and prompted to accept an inferior quality of life right accross the board, with the ultimate justification (however the psychiatrists dress it up) being that that's just the way it is, and nobody can do anything about it.

Remember, feminism has its universal excuse for everything it does; namely that women are oppressed by men. Men are doing better than women at something? It's discriminiation! It's oppression! Men earn more money than women? Discrimination! Oppression! So ingrained has this perception of things become, that many men go along with it without realising, to the extent that they feel guilty and ashamed when men are fairing better than women at something, and they applaud when they hear that men are doing worse than women. The feminist man is ultimately a self-loathing creature, but he has found a temporary way of avoiding self-loathing, and it is by dumping that loathing onto other men.

The way these psychiatrists carry on is no different to any other bunch of 'pro-feminist' men. Check out the Achilles Heel site if you don't believe me.
Re:Don't get sucked in (Score:0)
by Anonymous User on 06:44 PM November 14th, 2005 EST (#10)
No argument here mate. I believe you've got the entire picture 100% correct. It's too bad for these Marxist brainwashers that we've woken up to their scheme. When it's revealed as well as you've put it, most men will get the picture. The difficult part is getting your message spread.

It certainly wouldn't get published in the lefty mainstream press and media. But we must spread the word further afield. It's a big job, but I do believe it is being done, slowly.

Many thanks for your post.
[an error occurred while processing this directive]