|
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
 |
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 05:09 PM October 24th, 2004 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
As I've said to the point of annoying others on this site, what we are seeing happening to men through modern feminism is NO DIFFERENT than what happened to my people. (Indians)
It is no different than what the Jewish people in Nazi Germany saw happen to them.
The key, here, is; IT IS NO DIFFERENT.
As the article states, at first one's "lesser" rights are revoked, then slowly one's "greater" rights are revoked. This is happening to men in Canada, Great Britan, Australia, America, EVERYWHERE in the Western world. Make no mistake about it this IS THE GOAL OF FEMINISM!
It is the same goal that the U.S. government had pretaining to us Indians. It is the same goal the Australian government had towards the Aborigioals, It is the same goal as the Nazis towards Jews. It is following the EXACT SAME pattern, and it will wind up to the same ENDS pretaining to men as a whole.
It will not matter if you are a White man, a Black man, Red, Yellow, Brown or Tan, you WILL lose your rights, your sovernty your very PERSONHOOD simply because you are a MAN!
This is no exageration. It is a REALITY. I don't know how many more times that I will have to show the parallels between what is happening to men and what happened to Indians, Aborigionals, Jews etc., before many will finaly understand, and begin fighting this threat.
My guess is that we will, indeed, see a "Anti-hate-speech" law passed to effectively quash the free speech of men, in Canada.
We will also see it here in America.
Our first amendment rights are in sirious and very real danger, guys.
The day WILL come that women will have ABSOLUTE rights to free speech, and men will have NONE. We are seeing that happen NOW.
First our right to free speech will be removed, because that is the way it ALWAYS starts. It starts this way so that you will have NO LEGAL MEANS to verbaly protect yourself. You will literaly be stripped of your right to say; "ouch" when you are being hurt. LITERALY.
How far will we let this go, Gentelmen?
I hope we don't come to civil war. That is also on this path. But if that's what it takes, then that is what we must be willing to do, if it comes to that.
I for one am not going to be stuck on a God-forsaken land called a reservation again. Only this time I will be forced there not because I am indian, but because I am a MAN.
Because I have seen this dark spector before as an Indian, I recognize it again as a man.
Just to be certain, I am makeing my point...;
When we Indians heard we were going to be removed from our lands, have our religion(s) outlawed, or rights to free speech revoked, etc.
MANY of us said: "It can't possibly happen." "No way would a group of people do such a thing to their fellow human being...!"
Then, soon after we said that, we were slaughtered, removed, dis-placed. We had NO rights, no re-course and NO voice. NO VOICE!
It is comeing, my brothers. I tell you with my ancestors as my witnesses, it is COMEING...,
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 05:26 PM October 24th, 2004 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
We have learned from these bitter lessons not to trust them when they come up with plans to take care of their "inferiors". We will live and die as men, real men. Never again!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 05:34 PM October 24th, 2004 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
Slow down there, buddy. While Jews, Indians, Aborigines all had their own cultures, the societies of men and women are inextricably tied together. We will not be denied free speech or sent to camps because the majority of women would realize that this would hurt them as well. Besides, in America we take free speech very seriously, and hate speech legislation has not been successful (if any has been passed by government), especially on the internet. Remember, this is about Canada.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 08:26 PM October 24th, 2004 EST (#5)
|
|
|
|
|
"Besides, in America we take free speech very seriously, and hate speech legislation has not been successful (if any has been passed by government), especially on the internet. Remember, this is about Canada"
Guess again, hate speech law in the form of SB 1234 has now been passed in California (the 6th largest economy in the world) by none other than radical/gedner feminist Sheila Kuehl. We are not so far behind Canada at all.
Ray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 06:57 PM October 24th, 2004 EST (#4)
|
|
|
|
|
This report is 18 months old - deja-vu, indeed.
So is the article posted - 2003 - old hat.
Read the disclaimer: opinions do not necessarily reflect....etc" It caused a bit of a stir, some fireworks in the Canadian Parliasment and then it sank into oblivion - down into the cesspool of all the other feminist research, reports, papers etc.
Although perhaps tempting, the analogy with Australian Aborigines, Jews and Indians just doesn't work. These were clearly identifiable "other" groups - and small in numbers and clearly egionally defined. They were "small targets" and when compared to the major and dominant groups, they were easy targets. Much of the "damage" done to, e.g. Australian Aborigines and Indians was unintentional - when judged by the terms of the time. They just stood in the way - and had to go somewhere. The Jews in Germany, too, were urged to "move away" - and many did. The threat to them was also limited geographically. There was no whole-sale attack on Jews, globally.
Men are not an "other" group and are not a "small" group - they are half the world's population and need no protection. Men can look after themselves. They do not need to be portayed as "victims", except perhaps as of their own indecision, their own timidity versus women, their reluctance to resist or to act politically in their own interests, but, above all, they are the victims of their monumental disunity. There is, in addition to all the above, a lamentable lack of "texts" which identify the "Men's Movememnt". Lots of scriblings, blogs, whingeings and whinings, over-the-top comments and repeat-runs of the same old material - but no "plan de campagne" - no strategy, no goals. Just complaints. No Friedan, no Greer, no "scholarship" of any kind which has clout, which demands respect, which cannot be ignored. Men don't raise any dust - like the Women's Libbers did in the '60s and 70s of last Century.
Men are easy targets for any one with a loud voice, agressive attitude, flashing eyes and over-active tear ducts. Just refuse. Leave, walk away, whatever - but, above all: band together.
Until that happens, no-one is going to listen to us, because we pose no threat.
As they say: United we stand, divided we fall - wich is the exact opposite of the feminist attitude vis-a-vis men: there they "divide and conquer". But, for - and among - themselves they practice the "united we stand". To "all" women, "all" men are a threat - or so the mantra goes.
Once men decide to band - and stand - together - nothing will - or can - stand in their way.
We have been falling for a long time, it's time to reverse the direction!
As the other hero once said - "let's roll!"
Neale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 09:15 AM October 26th, 2004 EST (#20)
|
|
|
|
|
I don't think the analogy between men and Indian/Jew/Aborigine is entirely invalid. However, I thought your post made some excellent points. The absence of true scholarship in the mens movement is , I think, related to:
1/ Absence of Mens Studies ( the formation of Womens studies was central to the development of feminaziism )
2/ Exclusion of activists from mainstream media ( feminists had control of the media from the late 60's).
Hotspur
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The idea that new anti-free-speech laws would have to be enacted in order to silence men may underestimate the realities already in place in our courts, universities, and workplaces.
Anyone with even passing familiarity of what goes on routinely in the Family Courts would acknowledge that there is a vicious bias against men in matters of divorce, custody, and child support. Often, a man's testimony is dismissed out of hand or given far less weight than that of a woman's.
The domestic violence arena is pathogically anti-male in both theory and in practice. Men are pre-judged as guilty and there is virtually no means to "prove" innocence if you were born with the politically incorrect set of chromosomes.
The majority of colleges and universities have "Speech Codes" that feminists have used against men, based on the idea that women are a vulnerable "minority" like gays and people of color. (I guess you can comprise 57% of total college enrollments and still be a "minority" if you're female... go figure.)
Workplace policies on "sexual harassment" have poisoned interactions between women and men on-the-job, leaving men terrified of having any speech or behavior criminalized by the merest false accusation.
So, new laws are not necessary to formalize what is already well-entrenched in our social practices based on existing law.
Way back in the late 60's, Brazilian educator Paulo Freire wrote about the imposed "culture of silence" that muted the voices of millions of Third World peoples and in fact made them nearly invisible.
Men today are facing a similar situation, where attempts to bring men's voices into the public's consciousness are typically met with ridicule, disbelief, dismissal, and resistance.
The gender tyranny that has resulted from forty years of modern radical feminism is already evident in our laws; but it has also infiltrated ordinary daily life at work and at home... where it becomes invisible and accepted as "natural."
Whenever men's rights activists challenge the "natural feminist order," the culture of silence is overcome to some degree.
"It's a terrible thing ... living in fear."
- Roy: hunted replicant, Blade Runner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:29 PM October 26th, 2004 EST (#22)
|
|
|
|
|
This is a bit off the subject, but just to show ALL is not lost, I have a work place expirience that might be of interest.
A few years ago while I was on break at my place of employment I was the only man sitting near a small group of women, who were doing what alot of women do when they get in groups, and that of course is 'bash men'.
I sat quietly while they went on about how "awful men are" and how the world would be SOOOO much better if there were no men.
At one point I noticed one woman who kept looking over at me. At first I thought she was trying to see if I'd snap and say something. But actually she was looking at me some what apologeticaly. The other women seemed to be trying to change the subject, but this one loud mouth woman just kept going on and on about how much she just HATED men. Finaly, I'd had my fill of it, and I got up and as i walked past these women to leave I cussed them in Cherokee.
None of them being Indian, themselves (that I know of) they had no idea what I said to them and just looked SHOCKED.
Later, however, a few of the women found me in the building and actually APOLOGIZED. I thanked them, but then I told them that if it had been ME sitting there talking about women that way I would have likely been in alot of trouble.
Beleive it or not (Ripley), they said they KNEW that. I actually made freinds with a few of those ladies, but they NEVER sat around bashing men again. at least not when I was around.
And no, I never DID tell them what I said in Cherokee. Let's just say it was out of character for me to use such language.
My point is, I guess, is I wonder how many men in the work place just sit there and take it, like I was trying to do.
I just wonder if maybe more men speak up, like I finaly did, would we see less of this anti-male garbage from women in the work place?
I don't know. Maybe.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There comes a time in the cycle of opression when those being oppressed become willing victims of the process.
We accept the restrictions listed by Roy and adopt the strategy of silence pointed to by TC not only out of fear of social or legal reprisal, but also because we, as members of society, have accepted the logic and the moral definitons promoted by that society.
And these are all female pc definitions, that when accepted, justify the restrictions placed on us.
We as a group need to challenge not only the outcomes of these definitons, in terms of laws, legislation, etc, but the logic and the definitions themselves.
Do we accept and promote the female definition of equality?
Do we accept and promote the female definitons of gender?
Do we accept and promote the female interpretation of history?
Most of us here would not, but most people within society do. At first because its dangerous not to and then because its become the standard "wisdom". And its upon this standard "wisdom" that all these restrictions have been built.
We take away their definitions and we take away everything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thank you Cain for saying in much better language what I tried to express.
The fundamental P-O-W-E-R lies in "defining the terms of the contest."
Feminists have been masterful (indeed, we men have been in their schoolyard for the past forty years and our boys still struggle there...) at defining away male experiencies and voices.
You cannot recognize what language (and media) make invisible.
T-Cloud, I'd pay a lot of money to learn the exact meaning of the Cherokee slang curse you uttered to that table of vile women!
As for me, my old Trenchtown JA. patois will have to do --- "Dem gals fe Bumba Clats!"
"It's a terrible thing ... living in fear."
- Roy: hunted replicant, Blade Runner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 09:19 PM October 26th, 2004 EST (#29)
|
|
|
|
|
Roy.
Okay, I'll tell you what I said to them (in Cherokee) I said to them; "Agihutsa ani osda tla!"
Roughly translated that means 'You women are no good bitches'.
Sorry for the language, but that's what I said to them. It is probably better that I never told them what what I said meant.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thats a phrase that works in any language. Its too bad we have to use it so often.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Um hate to be a party-pooper but this is old news. Does anyone have any news re the current state of the movement in Canada to silence criticism of feminism? People in the US need to watch Canada closely because this kind of Canadian policy is often used as a defense for applying similar policy in the US, and vice versa. So what happens in other, esp. nearby countries, at this level, does affect us here in the US, like how when one state adopts a certain kind of law it may encourage other states to do the same.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 07:28 AM October 25th, 2004 EST (#9)
|
|
|
|
|
mcc is right. This is old news and what came out of this report was the government of Canada pulling the funding of the National Action Comittee on the Satus of Women. They are a non-enity now. They have no offices, no contact numbers, a website that is a shell. They are laughed at and scorned.
Check out my website where I reported this
http://gfmis.blogspot.com/2004/10/nac-is-non-entit y-womens-movement.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 07:44 AM October 25th, 2004 EST (#10)
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry the wbsite is http://gfmis.blogspot.com/2004/10/nac-is-non-entit y-womens-movement.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 07:48 AM October 25th, 2004 EST (#11)
|
|
|
|
|
http://gfmis.blogspot.com/2004/10/nac-is-non-entit y-womens-movement.html. FOR SOME REASON THERE IS A SPACE BETWEEN THE T AND THE Y IN THE WORD ENTITY. I can't get it to work. Please manually in your address bar close the space between the T and the Y.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Readin about their debt:
Let this be a lesson to those organising men's groups. Move slowly and steadily. Better to slowly build a base than to lash out and hurt yourself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:53 PM October 25th, 2004 EST (#13)
|
|
|
|
|
...now I feel like an idiot...,
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 01:15 PM October 25th, 2004 EST (#14)
|
|
|
|
|
No, you're not an idiot.
Your people went through some brutal atrosities. And you're right it DID start out this way. So I don't think anyone can blame you for being a bit skittish when you see something similar happening.
Don't be so hard on yourself.
Jinx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is news to me. I work for the government of Canada and there was a local office of SOW in one of the buildings I work at not that many days ago. Also I was sent an e-mail by our resident feminazi to visit the SOW website to see the ongoing ax grinding for "Women's History Month" The funding crisis that you speak of is as perennial as the funding crisis that most symphony orchestras face...somehow they always get rescued.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yep...there they are alive and well
http://www.swc-cfc.gc.ca/about/about_e.html
One thing that could be good though is that Paul Martin did manage (personage?) to get SOW's primary champion Sheila Copps dumped from the Liberal Party and her recent book which took many cheap shots at him has been dismissed by critics (even former supporters of Copps ) as a "drive by shooting"unsubstatiated allegations that Martin's team responded to well.
In the wake of the backlash and lawsuit that came from this report Martin read SOW the riot act and told them that all future budgets will be "results oriented".
You are right about one thing...it has degenerated to a mutual admiration society of Women's Studies professors who few people take as seriously as they take themselves anymore.
My response to the posting of the blacklist was this:
Having read the results of this "research" I have the following comments:- first and foremost in response to the call to intimidate those who would criticize or oppose feminists, just type in the words "All men must die" in the Google search engine and you will find 3,900,000 hits. Not only does this phrase meet the criteria of inciting to hatred, it meets the criteria of uttering death threat. This report and it's recommendations was one of the worst examples of the pot calling the kettle black that I have ever read on a government sponsored site. The Internet is absolutely saturated with culture of mysandry content but it is apparent from this response that feminists really don't like the taste of their own medicine.
Here is a definition...BIGOT....someone who has a lot to say about a group of people and not one word of it good.....
No doubt by now the Status of Women advisory council has acquired a considerable library of resource material from feminist contributors. ....I will make you a wager....if in all of this material....enough to fill a library no doubt....you are able to find one page, even so much as one paragraph that has anything good to say about men.....I will kiss your ass...upon failure to do so....you can kiss mine...FEMINISTS ARE BIGOTS...and I am certainly not the first person to have noticed.
The next point I would like to raise is the legitimate concern of these people you have labelled " masculinists" about the future of males attending the public schools of Canada. I am an alumnus of Mount Saint Vincent University....Canada's foremost bastion of Feminazi loonytoons. Having a first hand experience in the culture of mysandry political indoctrination that teachers must submit to and subscribe to gives me serious concerns for the future of my two grandsons who will have a horrible culture of mysandry gauntlet of bullying to face when they are put in the charge of women who have a chronic bug up their ass against anything and everything male...but like all other bullies will only take it out on those who are in no position to fight back.
Which raises a question in my mind about the lawful mandate of the "National Advisory Council on the Status of Women" in terms of efforts made by males for males. Why would this qualify as a "women's issue?"
Were you aware that there is a Roman Catholic monastic order called "The Sisters of Your Having Sex Business"? .....in other words it's nun of your fucking business sisters. Please stick to the knitting of your lawful mandate.
To the observation that "masculinists"are merely maladaptive failures in social Darwinism I say...the unfortunate individuals who were vanquished Bourgeoisie in Communist re-education camps frequently did not adapt to their new political situation...how terribly inept of them...however political power is a very fickle thing...often not much more permanent than a calendar. And no system of enforced egalitarianism has ever lasted very long. My advice to all people who hold positions of power is this...be very careful of how you treat those you have power over, because whether or not you will have power over them tomorrow remains to be seen...I'm sure you have been on Parliament Hill long enough to know what I am on about.
I must, however, compliment those who prepared this "report" for their scholarly language. You know it is very interesting how universities are willing to pervert scholarship with various things called "studies"...the infamous Dr Mengele had a medical degree in "Racial Studies" just about every bushwacker in the IRA has a degree in "Celtic Studies" the willingness of universities to commit the travesty of clothing bigotry in the cap and gown of scholarship disgusts me...but their command of language is indeed impressive...perhaps one of them could tell a maladaptive "masculinist" (in a social Darwinism sense) such as myself whether or not "pedant" is the pluperfect of "pissant".
But to return to the title line of "Please add my name to your McCarthy list" please do....if this was an attempt to silence dissent it has failed miserably and no doubt backfired. To make matters perfectly clear in my own personal case...it would in all honesty be an understatement to say that I dislike feminists...I hate them rancourously...I celebrate the thwarting of their efforts to achieve their political goals ...I dance when one of them is fed large helpings of crow and humble pie after they have so foolishly abused the power they were given...making feminist abusers of power long in the face has become my passion...my favourite hobby... and I am proud to say I have succeeded many times when many have thought I would fail. Now before you label me a mysogynist please consider this... the jewel of my life is my beautiful dynamic daughter who's every success fills me with joy.. I simply have a problem with the notion that the only way to achieve a better deal for women is by orchestrating a culture of mysandry. I did not aquire that attitude from visiting sites on the internet...I had aquired it much more honestly than that long before the internet was even created.
Please do add me to the RCMP shit list...Feminazis have nothing good to say about men and I have nothing good to say about feminazis...if this was an attempt to intimidate or silence dissent it failed miserably and in fact will probably backfire big time. The era of the sexual sicophant is over. The era of " you better not say anything critical about feminists"is over. The high water mark of the feminazi movement is in the past.
Just by the way...I studied and taught martial arts for 25 years and I have no intention of going quietly. So please instruct the RCMP swat team to prepare for stubborn resistance and get their sniper to blow out my medula....after carefull consideration I would rather die than be ruled by the likes of you or any of your feminazi friends.
I WAITED A LONG TIME...GUESS WHAT....THE RCMP NEVER CAME
I also sent this directly to Paul Martin:
For many years I was a distant and non-involved "masculinist" who had some tangles with feminists in the past, but things seemed to be on a more leveling keel and I was settled into a pattern of letting it slide and letting feminism die a natural death of no-victim-trip-to-feed-it. What I encountered on the Status of Women Website regarding the blacklisting of opponents to feminism and a McCarthy style witch hunt outraged me more than anything I have ever seen eminating from Parliament Hill in all my 53 years and that is saying something. I have come out of my cocoon and I have becaome an activist a "masculinist" so says SOW. Today at one of the blacklisted sites I posted the following message
The Government of Canada is unique among the nations of the democratic world in that it has legislated as a "permanent" attachment to itself a special interest lobby group that has a policy influence that is far beyond it's actual popular support. The National Advisory Council on the Status of Women is what created and is sustaining this nightmare. Get this straight...SOW IS THE ENEMY. They are exempt of the usual requirements of registering as a political party, running in election, suffering the consequences of pissing off voters, and all of the normal things that one would associate with a democratic system. We have in fact created a public service bureaucracy who's members are by patronage appointment and who have a career investment in perpetuating a culture of mysandry. Get rid of SOW or at least achieve a carrot and stick control of hurting their funding when they go too far and your other problems will have a chance to be rectified. The best way do do this is to create as much public embarrassment for them as possible when they go too far. The SOW blacklist may be the best thing that has ever happened to us. Do not loose the momentum of the counterattack. Make them fully accountable for every piece of "policy research" they ever post and DO NOT LET THEM GET AWAY WITH ANOTHER DAMN THING. The closest they came to having their funding cut off altogher was during the Mulrooney era when they were so bored that they could find nothing better to do that go through Hansard with a pink highlighter looking for comments that they deemed "hetero-sexist". I think Paul Martin's ouster of Sheila Copps might be a golden opportunity. Instead of trying to get an MP to fight our cause...make it project number one to put as much effort as possible into the defeat of anyone and everyone appointed to the cabinet post of Secretary of State for Status of Women and keep up THAT pressure until IT becomes the kiss of death on anybody's political career.
I also posted this
I am also new to this site but by no means new to this cause. In fact it was the SOW McCarthy list that got me out of my lair, in fact I may be arrested for the declaration of war that I sent in with my request to be added to this distinguished black list. I do have a history of scoring victories against feminazis who abused their power or went beyond their legal mandate...often it was lonely because people fear offending feminazis. I wanted to particpate in the blacklist forum but I see it is restricted and I can understand why if their is a law suit pending. For what it is worth I have a personal history of feminists trying to get me under the " hate law " thing but it did not even get off the ground. Here is why....Racism is not a race....sexism is not a gender....Naziism is not a religion....these things are political ideologies and as such are not subject to protection under Canada's "hate laws". The same is true of "feminism" it is not a race, it is not a religion, and IT IS NOT A GENDER...IT IS A POLITICAL IDEOLOGY AND NOTHING MORE...feminazis just can't get beyond the arrogance and egotism that they do not speak for women collectively. How pray tell are feminists an "identifyable group"? Visible minorities have colored skin...Jews have a sort of family resemblence you might say...but does anyone recognize a feminist on sight by the fact that she has three tits and two cleavages? Does anybody ever say "funny you don't look Feminist"? Now I suppose you could say " the marine sargeant haircut, little round Leon Trotski glasses and that well practiced hatefull sneer that could boil water are a dead giveaway" but I have even encountered women who fit THAT description who would never dream of inflicting some of the betrayals on men that I have seen come from women that you would never think to look at them harboured great hatred of men...I ONLY WISH FEMININAZIS WERE AN " IDENTIFYABLE GROUP" SO THAT I COULD AVOID HAVING ANYTHING TO DO WITH THEM WHEN I SAW THEM AT A DISTANCE....usually you have no idea until some of their typical spit spray comes out of their mouths like "fish need bicycles".
What I have found to be the best approach for taking down feminazis is to dry up the funding that these noxious weeds grow in and to create as much public embarrassment as possible for any institution that harbours and protects them. Also refusal to lend financial contribution to ANYTHING that even in the slightest degree harbours or helps the culture of mysandry and telling the canvasser in no uncertain terms why has done wonders in the past. These noxious weeds grow in the hydrponics of public funding and charitable donation. Let's face it there is no private sector market for their skills. So we can all do little things like ...do not contribute to your alumni association....your contribution helps free up funds for "women's studies" parasites to go shop the world for evidence that men are villians...do no give to your United Way...I was an employee of a United Way and the funding of battered women's shelters was providing employment for the most biggoted examples of the movement in town (when the funding dried up they couldn't find employment anywhere except in a pool hall breaking balls) And eventually..,,if we work together we can dry up the funding of SOW and the other nightmares will soon end after that. TAKE NO PRISONNERS!!. These witches have made a firm commitment to devote their lifetimes to grinding that ax and have a vested interest in perpetuating the culture of mysandry. Now just as a little incentive, you should all be made aware that their next project in "law reform" will be a set of regulations governing who a man can and can not have a relationship with...based on some feminazi notion of "balanced power". Men in their forties for instance would not be permitted to have a relationship with a woman who is twenty-five...informed consent or not.....you think I'm kidding don't you.
Sir I hope you get the idea, we are not THAT well organized YET but we have become motivated. And just by the way sir, Why would what men do in support of men be a "women's issue"? I think there is a legitamit question of lawful mandate oops .....persondate....wouldn't want a feminazi to sick her doberperson on me...I stand politically corrected.
-------------------------------------------------
Being a Government of Canada employee in this post 9/11 paranoia i did become a "person of interest" to the head of security where I work. He started having coffee with me and talking to me with entusiastic interest (actually we have known each oter for some time, he has actually been a chauffer body guard to prime ministers and other VIPs) after about a two week assesment of me as a risk threat his official report was "You can fuckin well shoot me too...it's high time somebody told those arrogant bitches off"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is indeed old news, The witches of Laval and Status of Women Canada are looking at a BIG lawsuit for slander from those on the blacklist and the backlash to this was the biggest ever in the history of Canadian feminism. But just to take the opportunity to post my own best counter punch to this and put in a plug for my own pet project:
Notice: Four feminazi "women's studies" professors from the University of Laval used a grant from Status of Women Canada to insult and slander all right minded men's activists and advocated to the government of Canada to monitor mensactivism sites as hate groups. In response to this outrage I am offering a reward of $1000.00 Canadian for information in written transcript form of anything uttered by or published by any women's studies professor in Canada which could be construed as a violation of the "hate laws"in Canada's Criminal Code, which leads to charges being laid against such person. A bonus of $1000.00 Canadian will be paid if that charge leads to a conviction. An additional bonus of $1000.00 will be paid if the accused is or ever has been a participant in the National Advisory Council for Status of Women.
In order that my e-mail not be attacked by hackers please send responses by snail mail to : G Craig
5356 Trans Canada Highway
Eldon, Prince Edward Island, Canada
C0A 1A0
If any of you are currently in university see if you can get this posted in your campus paper.
The die is cast....the Rubicon has been crossed.
Just by the way, Canada's "Hate Law" has only ever been invoked on four occassions ...all four were complaints subbmitted by lawyers representing B'nai Brith...all four went to the Supreme Court and all four were really over the top asking for trouble anti-Semitism.
The witches of Laval made this suggestion without ever having read the actual Criminal Code Statute.
The legal stopper is that just as Communists cannot legitamately claim to speak for the working class...feminists cannot legitamitly claim to speak for women.Political ideologies are not protected against expressions of hate.
There has been interesting fallout from this just the same and it is far from over. For one thing the feminazis set up a hatewatch for father's rights sites and the administrator of that web server shut them down as a hate site. The current Minister of Justice has vowed to take action against hate sites on the internet but apparently has done no research into the matter in preparatin for his proposed legislation. His party The Liberal Party of Canada is currently in a one vote minority Parliment and it only takes a collusion of any two of the other three parties to defeat them so it is not likely they will push it.
In any serious examination of the phenomina of gender hatred on the internet it is the feminazis who stand the most to loose. I have encountered some real hard core mysogynists but the meanest thing I have ever heard of being advocated against women collectively is repeal of the 19 ammendment.
We on MANN have routinely attacked things advocated against men that greatly exceed the guidlines of incitement to hatred.
What would be of greater concern to you folks in America is Sheila Chuen's proposal to make those who "advocate for"protected groups subject to protection under your hate laws.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 08:13 AM October 26th, 2004 EST (#19)
|
|
|
|
|
"What would be of greater concern to you folks in America is Sheila Chuen's proposal to make those who "advocate for"protected groups subject to protection under your hate laws."
It's not a proposal anymore, it's now law. SB 1234, originated by State Senator Sheila Kuehl was signed into law by dimwitted Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Ray
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's a blessing in disguise....you are advocating for men.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 06:14 PM October 26th, 2004 EST (#28)
|
|
|
|
|
"It's a blessing in disguise....you are advocating for men."
Yea, that's all they left us. If we get critical of the radical/gender feminists, they can always allege now that they felt "intimidated" which is one of the parameters of the hate crime law.
Of course men, it appears, not being in a protected class of human beings can continue to be maligned, bashed and bad mouthed in all the man-hating women's studies classes on college campuses across California.
Click now more than ever
Ray
Please do not scroll up the page of the linked item(s). All the info I'm trying to convey is as the page initially comes up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ray, For a while I was really worried about the consequences of loosing the ability to speak out against them. I think it is now safe to say that there are more closet masculinists in North America than there are "outed"lesbians.
When the time comes that men would suffer worse consequences for what they might say than for what they might do....you know as well as me what is bound to happen. One way or another the Feminazi Reich is in collapse and their defeat is inevitable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 05:02 PM October 25th, 2004 EST (#16)
|
|
|
|
|
Even though this is old news, its still a valuable reminder of just how self serving hyterical and fundamentality dangerous feminism is. And i do mean "ALL" feminism.
This is also something i missed the first time around so im glad its been reposted.
Maybe we should make a point of reposting this article every 6 months just to make sure every one is clear on exactly why we are all here, and what it is we are fighting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:05 PM October 25th, 2004 EST (#17)
|
|
|
|
|
Just so everybody can realize how amazingly true this is, I went to Barnes and Noble and tried to look up a book on men, and all the books somehow had to do with women. Mind Boggling isn't it? I looked up a book on women and it found women books, women cassettes and just about everything women. I looked up a book on the founding fathers and got a bunch of books by comedians and a few text books. I looked up founding mothers just as a joke and I actually found a book called founding mothers...talk about silence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:49 AM October 26th, 2004 EST (#18)
|
|
|
|
|
That's like when I use the key-words "Male bashing", I get alot of "male bashing jokes" pages in return.
If I try "female bashing".... not so much.
In fact alot of the pages that come back talk about the damageing effects of "female bashing" on women and girls.
Thundercloud.
"Hoka hey!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 05:38 AM October 27th, 2004 EST (#31)
|
|
|
|
|
We should add this too. I guess this story has legs. Check out this offer of a reward for misandric womyn "professors".
THE STORY CONTINUES
Notice: Four feminazi "women's studies" professors from the University of Laval used a grant from Status of Women Canada to insult and slander all right minded men's activists and advocated to the government of Canada to monitor mensactivism sites as hate groups. In response to this outrage I am offering a reward of $1000.00 Canadian for information in written transcript form of anything uttered by or published by any women's studies professor in Canada which could be construed as a violation of the "hate laws"in Canada's Criminal Code, which leads to charges being laid against such person. A bonus of $1000.00 Canadian will be paid if that charge leads to a conviction. An additional bonus of $1000.00 will be paid if the accused is or ever has been a participant in the National Advisory Council for Status of Women.
In order that my e-mail not be attacked by hackers please send responses by snail mail to :
G Craig
5356 Trans Canada Highway
Eldon, Prince Edward Island,
Canada C0A 1A0
If any of you are currently in university see if you can get this posted in your campus paper.
The die is cast....the Rubicon has been crossed.
It's up to you university students. Don't let the Witches of Laval get away with their misandric propoganda.
Courtesy http://gfmis.blogspot.com
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|
