This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If one Knows this, no surprise, women have reproductive rights, men are the slaves that must work to support the children they decide to have, plus work to make women lifes as better as possible at their expense. Sperm usage,children, sexual harrasment, date rape, whatever, just excuses to exploite men while avoiding saying openly that men are just slaves.
Once it will be said openly, that men are just slaves, no one should be surprised, slaves has no right to have children, or rise them, or chose to have or not to have them, (abortion, custody, single parenthood), no way, we are taking about slaves, get paid for working or hold properties, please, give me a break!!.
Till know it has been disguised, trying to justify the plundering of men properties and salaries, among other niceties, just to make men think they are not slaves, so they will not revolt, and keep working, so there is more to plunder.
The faster this is acknowledge by men, the better, things will start to change, but if men still think they are not slaves, they still believe in Santa Claus, everything will remain the same and get worst, i hope it will get worst, till enough men awake.
who will be surprise by a Nazi judge saying that jews has no souls? , no one. knowing that for feminist and their minions men are just slaves without reproductive rights, who will be surprised by this ruling?, none, you are surprised becouse you still donīt acknowledge the fact that you are an slave, men that don`t get it are surprised, they still have the ilusion of having the same staus than females.
People that treat men like shit will be treated like trash, people that steal men children, their houeses, exploite them as slave labor, denies them the right to have children, makes them having unwanted children, are criminals.
They must receive exaclty the same treatment, along with all the people that supports them, and make it possible that to happen, "i was following oders" was not an excuse for the nazis at the Nurenber trials, and will not be for feminits in the future.
This judge, and the women awarded "to profit from the slave labor of a man" should have his/her properties taken, children taken, (criminals can not rise children, "in the best interes of the child"), should work for food, the remaining taken to compansate males, and jailed, make his/her life so miserable as to consider suicide seriously.
Those crimes can not, and should not be forgotten, impunity must not be tolerated.
But yet, while most of men keep on living the ilusion of having the same staus than women, this will not happen. While most men think that they are safe, that if they "behave" that wont happen to them, no solution, no change.
Thats why, the worst things become to men, the better, the more men burned by divorce the better, (no "you see if you are good wont happen to you"), till achieving the critical mass necessary to make men react.
So i feel sorry for the guy, but not for the ruling, it just exposes them a litle bit more, that helps to open the eyes of more men, bad news?, no, good news.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 03:09 PM July 26th, 2004 EST (#2)
|
|
|
|
|
What does this mean for sperm donation in general? In this case, the sperm donation was done directly, presumably through intercourse, rather than through a third party sperm bank.
According to CNN, "Despite an agreement that appeared to be a binding contract, the father is obligated to provide financial support, the court decided."
Is this the end of sperm banks and sperm donor programs in Pennsylvania? I certainly wouldn't donate any sperm there (or anywhere else for that matter). Could this be the end of sperm banks and sperm donor programs across the country as men become fearful that they might have to pay child support?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What about egg donations? Shouldn't a woman who donates eggs be held just as "liable" as a man who donates sperm?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I would LOVE to see it, but I doubt it'll happen.
Steven Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shooting themselves in the foot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shooting themselves in the foot. (for some reason the computer sent this before I finished it, sorry)
Anyways, First they made getting married so toxic men are running for their lives. Then they made casual sex so scary more and more men are passing. Now they take sperm donation and make it a hazard. What's going to happen is they'll finally wake up and realize there is no way they can reproduce. Maybe Darwin really did know what he was talking about;-)
The Biscuit Queen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, but see we men are gonna see women like YOU around. Italian hotties who can cook (bisquits), like dogs, and treat men well. Then we'll have hope, get married, get robbed, and perpetuate it ...
(totally tongue in cheek .. sometimes we need a shot of humor around here!)
Steven Guerilla Gender Warfare is just Hate Speech in polite text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah yeah. When we sit in our huts around the fire after the collapse of civilization, you can all point to me and say..."It's all your fault...you and those damn biscuits!" Your wife and I will have to be thrown out into the wilderness, since I am sure she is as bad as I am.
So we should start heating up frozen dinners, sleep in another room and start slapping you guys around? hmm...
;-)
The Biscuit Queen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 12:14 PM July 27th, 2004 EST (#9)
|
|
|
|
|
Edit and correct this article to include missing viewpoints. It has a wide audience and will be perminant testimate to what this site, and others like it, are about:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men's_rights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"This guy thought he could have his cake and eat it too."
Yep, only women can get away with that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 07:36 PM July 28th, 2004 EST (#13)
|
|
|
|
|
but what would be the point of having a cake and not eating it???
p. george
|
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]
|