This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 11:59 PM July 9th, 2004 EST (#1)
|
|
|
|
|
Exactly what were the charges - the article is vague. I didn't know it was against the law to be an asshole, but apprently it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair enough that this sort of harrassment should attract a penalty, but the judge in this case has no sense of proportion!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by Anonymous User on 10:38 AM July 10th, 2004 EST (#3)
|
|
|
|
|
In Canada the only *criminal* charge involving harrassment is called 'criminal harrassment' and the person must be in credible fear and apprehension for their life, *and* being physically followed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It seems to be a trend in Western nations, especially in the USA to put as many citizens as possible (mostly still men of course, but there are a growing number of women like Martha Stewart who are getting the shaft by the system too!) into a Stalinist era type Gulag prison system for the slightest of provocation and technicalities.
I think the US recently passed Red China in the proportion of its population behind bars or under supervised probation, house arrest and so on.
I thought the West was a community that loved freedom and liberty for the individual? But as Charles Dickens said, "the first order of business of the law is to make more business for itself."
|
|
|
|
|
[an error occurred while processing this directive]